Tennessee Tech13-17

OVCCoach: John Pelphrey

13-17NET#288

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jaylon Johnson	1,801	238	88.3%	−0.150	+2.062	+2.138	−4.314	+1.262	−4.696	+7.688	+3.218	−2.032	+4.096	+2.934
Kyle Layton	1,624	415	79.6%	−2.042	−4.528	−2.564	−2.030	−3.720	−1.166	−0.450	−3.784	−3.916	+1.372	+4.126
Daniel Egbuniwe	1,328	711	65.1%	+12.890	−3.034	−15.898	−0.940	−3.322	−0.050	+4.778	−4.388	+3.382	+3.896	−4.474
Rodney Johnson Jr.	999	1,040	49.0%	−7.326	−2.140	+5.222	+1.668	−3.026	+0.048	−2.438	+2.126	−3.022	−0.248	−1.156
Matthew Sells	973	1,066	47.7%	+4.568	+4.576	+0.148	+4.188	+1.262	+2.714	+3.070	−0.556	+0.354	+0.358	+2.436
Ola Ajiboye	840	1,199	41.2%	+3.564	−0.946	−4.372	−1.336	+3.682	+1.132	−3.630	−1.666	−1.834	+1.778	−3.468
Grant Slatten	739	1,300	36.3%	−4.634	+7.184	+11.74	+5.092	−3.124	+0.048	+3.772	+4.88	−0.942	−2.020	+3.928
JaJuan Nicholls	687	1,352	33.7%	+1.054	−0.946	−1.960	+1.568	−2.926	−0.354	−3.432	+1.730	+5.894	−0.542	−2.262
Ray Glasgow	638	1,401	31.3%	+14.494	+10.994	−3.668	+0.860	+9.8100	−1.674	+2.668	−3.886	+3.582	−2.218	+6.916
Mekhi Cameron	307	1,732	15.1%	−12.214	−5.224	+7.016	−1.436	−1.042	+1.034	−7.814	+2.028	−2.328	−3.012	−5.980
Grant Strong	132	1,907	6.5%	−37.82	−19.72	+18.20	−12.62	+2.474	+2.220	−6.318	+5.18	−9.22	−1.724	+0.646
David Craig	112	1,927	5.5%	−13.512	−18.82	−5.276	−14.92	−0.150	−3.792	−1.444	−2.272	+8.8100	−7.12	−10.292

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jaylon Johnson	1,801	238	88.3%	-4.540	104.438	108.944	50.3%46	27.3%36	17.2%46	29.6%48	50.1%50	66.0%38	15.9%40	22.4%72
Kyle Layton	1,624	415	79.6%	-4.938	103.234	108.146	50.4%46	26.5%32	17.5%44	28.7%46	48.9%58	65.5%36	15.6%40	22.8%70
Daniel Egbuniwe	1,328	711	65.1%	-0.246	103.134	103.358	50.4%46	26.1%30	17.7%42	30.4%52	48.2%62	67.4%42	16.7%46	20.5%76
Rodney Johnson Jr.	999	1,040	49.0%	-8.232	103.034	111.338	51.6%50	25.7%30	17.7%42	27.5%42	50.7%50	64.7%34	15.3%36	21.5%74
Matthew Sells	973	1,066	47.7%	-2.244	106.542	108.746	53.0%58	27.9%38	19.1%32	30.4%52	49.4%56	66.4%38	15.6%38	23.3%68
Ola Ajiboye	840	1,199	41.2%	-2.542	103.636	106.152	50.0%40	29.3%44	18.3%36	26.7%40	48.7%58	65.3%36	16.4%44	20.1%76
Grant Slatten	739	1,300	36.3%	-7.434	108.648	116.128	54.0%62	25.1%28	17.7%42	31.2%54	52.7%40	65.7%36	14.1%28	24.5%64
JaJuan Nicholls	687	1,352	33.7%	-3.940	103.536	107.448	51.8%52	25.3%28	17.5%44	26.5%40	50.8%50	70.2%56	15.1%36	20.5%76
Ray Glasgow	638	1,401	31.3%	5.456	111.656	106.252	51.3%50	33.8%62	16.6%50	30.5%52	47.0%66	68.6%48	13.8%28	26.8%58
Mekhi Cameron	307	1,732	15.1%	-14.924	99.728	114.630	49.6%40	26.3%32	18.6%36	22.2%26	51.3%48	64.3%30	12.8%22	17.0%86
Grant Strong	132	1,907	6.5%	-39.96	85.710	125.612	39.0%8	29.4%44	19.7%28	22.9%28	54.4%32	57.7%12	13.8%26	22.6%70
David Craig	112	1,927	5.5%	-17.320	86.410	103.758	36.8%6	27.1%36	14.2%68	27.5%42	47.6%64	74.6%74	8.6%6	12.4%92

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jaylon Johnson	1,801	238	88.3%	-4.540	102.334	106.850	54.6%64	26.1%30	21.8%16	22.1%26	46.8%68	68.0%46	11.8%16	19.5%78
Kyle Layton	1,624	415	79.6%	-2.942	107.746	110.740	52.4%54	30.2%48	18.6%36	29.1%46	52.6%40	69.4%52	14.4%30	18.8%80
Daniel Egbuniwe	1,328	711	65.1%	-13.026	106.042	119.122	51.4%50	29.4%44	17.7%42	25.8%36	52.5%40	64.1%30	12.9%22	24.9%64
Rodney Johnson Jr.	999	1,040	49.0%	-0.946	105.240	106.152	50.0%40	28.6%42	17.7%42	29.9%50	48.6%60	67.7%44	15.5%38	22.6%70
Matthew Sells	973	1,066	47.7%	-6.736	102.032	108.646	48.9%38	26.7%34	16.4%52	27.4%42	49.9%54	66.1%38	15.2%36	20.9%74
Ola Ajiboye	840	1,199	41.2%	-6.036	104.538	110.440	51.3%50	25.7%30	17.3%44	30.3%50	50.3%50	67.0%42	14.7%32	23.4%68
Grant Slatten	739	1,300	36.3%	-2.842	101.632	104.456	49.0%38	28.2%40	17.7%42	27.5%42	47.9%62	66.6%38	16.1%42	20.6%76
JaJuan Nicholls	687	1,352	33.7%	-4.940	104.438	109.344	50.3%46	28.2%40	17.8%40	29.9%50	49.1%56	64.4%32	15.6%38	22.7%70
Ray Glasgow	638	1,401	31.3%	-9.032	100.730	109.742	50.5%46	24.0%24	18.2%38	27.9%44	50.8%50	65.1%34	16.1%42	20.0%78
Mekhi Cameron	307	1,732	15.1%	-2.742	104.940	107.648	51.0%48	27.4%36	17.6%42	30.0%50	49.3%56	66.6%38	15.8%40	23.0%70
Grant Strong	132	1,907	6.5%	-2.044	105.440	107.448	51.6%50	27.0%34	17.6%42	29.2%48	49.3%56	66.9%42	15.5%38	22.0%72
David Craig	112	1,927	5.5%	-3.840	105.240	108.944	51.6%50	27.2%36	17.9%40	28.9%46	49.8%54	65.8%36	15.8%40	22.6%70

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Tennessee TechTenn. Tech13-17

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Tennessee Tech13-17