Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
SWAC
Texas Southern logo

Texas Southern

24-14NET#209Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #274Coach: Johnny Jones
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
WBaylor logoLGonzaga logoLIowa St. logoLSan Diego St. logoLEvansville logoWOregon logoWHTLArizona St. logoLGeorgia logoWCTLTulane logoLLamar logoWTexas A&M logoWAlcorn St. logoWSouthern logoLPrairie View A&M logoLGrambling St. logoWJackson St. logoLArkansas Pine Bluff logoWMississippi Valley St. logoWAlabama St. logoWAlabama A&M logoWPrairie View A&M logoWGrambling St. logoWJackson St. logoWArkansas Pine Bluff logoWMississippi Valley St. logoWAlabama St. logoWAlabama A&M logoWAlcorn St. logoLSouthern logoWSouthern logoWAlabama St. logoLPrairie View A&M logoWNew Orleans logoWUT Rio Grande Valley logoWLouisiana Monroe logoLGreen Bay logo

Team Stats

38 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating5.567
  • Offensive Rating182.098
  • Defensive Rating176.53
  • Pace44.84
  • Effective FG%51.3%57
  • Off Rebound Pct32.5%86
  • Turnover Pct34.6%3
  • FT Attempt Rate41.5%95

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct63.2%76
  • Point Margin / Game2.561
  • Points / Game81.694
  • Points Allowed / Game79.26
  • 1st Half Margin-2.319
  • 2nd Half Margin4.893
  • Avg Largest Lead7.613
  • Avg Largest Deficit15.111

Box Score

  • Points / Game81.694
  • Rebounds / Game39.695
  • Assists / Game15.691
  • ORebs / Game12.592
  • DRebs / Game27.185
  • Steals / Game8.193
  • Blocks / Game3.041
  • Turnovers / Game15.57
  • PFs / Game17.945

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game28.593
  • FGAs / Game62.693
  • Field Goal Pct45.5%71
  • 2PMs / Game21.296
  • 2PAs / Game40.293
  • 2-Point Pct52.8%79
  • 3PMs / Game7.338
  • 3PAs / Game22.451
  • 3-Point Pct32.4%21
  • FTMs / Game17.498
  • FTAs / Game26.099
  • Free Throw Pct66.8%13

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s52.0%72
  • % Pts from 3s26.7%14
  • % Pts from FTs21.3%87
  • Paint Pts / Game17.428
  • % Pts in Paint21.3%17
  • Fast Break Pts / Game3.321
  • % Pts on Fast Break4.1%16
  • Points off TOVs / Game8.618
  • % Pts off TOVs10.6%13
  • 1st Half Pts / Game36.178
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game43.798

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %55.1%56
  • Points / Shot1.3075
  • 3-Point Att Rate35.8%29
  • Assist Pct54.6%71
  • Assists / 100 Poss34.798
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.00x44
  • PF Drawn / Game20.996

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%51.6%40
  • Opp True Shooting %54.4%54
  • Opp Field Goal Pct45.4%31
  • Opp 2-Point Pct51.1%40
  • Opp 3-Point Pct35.0%40
  • Opp 3PA Rate35.4%82
  • Opp FT Att Rate32.6%51
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2457

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game79.26
  • Paint Pts Allowed16.179
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed3.874
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed9.471
  • Opp Assist Pct55.7%20
  • TOVs Forced / Game15.393

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct68.3%15
  • Turnovers Forced Pct32.4%98
  • Steal Pct18.1%99
  • Block Pct6.7%82
  • Hakeem Pct24.8%98
  • PF Efficiency0.90x92
  • Steals / PF0.46x92
  • Blocks / PF0.17x40

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
  • #18FTAR41.5%
  • #58OREB%32.4%
  • #90Opp TOV%20.3%
  • #101AST%54.6%
  • #133Pts Diff+94
  • #139REB Diff+46
  • #156eFG%51.3%
  • #159TS%54.5%
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
  • #322SOS-7.0
  • #294Opp OREB%31.1%
  • #2813P%32.4%
  • #279TOV%20.1%
  • #2503PM Diff-27
  • #246Adj DRtg108.2
  • #225Opp eFG%51.3%
  • #214Opp 3P%34.8%
Game Log
Loading game log…
T. ArmstrongJr5'10"+1.58851.7%3719.6%617.72.03.135.9%81.3%
J. CombsSr6'7"+1.58862.0%8224.5%8717.69.31.526.3%58.9%
T. ReedSr7'2"+1.17672.4%9420.5%6812.77.80.740.0%62.9%
J. PattersonSr6'1"+0.96849.6%2922.6%7911.83.53.831.0%77.7%
D. ButlerSr6'5"+0.86456.4%6215.7%339.44.31.941.3%72.7%
D. BruceSr6'3"+0.65350.7%3420.9%707.71.61.923.7%87.5%
J. JonesSo6'0"+0.12653.8%4818.9%567.71.41.535.2%85.4%
E. EwingSr6'8"-0.21753.5%4721.8%769.37.01.236.4%52.6%
J. HopkinsSo6'5"-0.21555.2%5618.4%526.34.00.616.7%66.3%
S. OldenSr6'3"44.8%1616.4%384.31.01.024.1%72.2%
D. LumpkinJr6'1"47.3%229.6%70.90.80.150.0%0.0%
K. Granger Jr.So6'5"0.0%10.00.00.00.0%0.0%
C. McClellandSo6'5"40.6%1110.7%91.41.20.819.2%50.0%
M. DobbinsFr6'6"69.4%9312.4%140.80.70.00.0%71.4%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Texas Southern logo25-2612-18#333-15.79101.713117.511-9.05-538-65929.2%33+342250.3%3032.9%3371.7%41
Texas Southern logo24-2515-17#267-7.72798.67106.363-9.22-4027-371830.7%53-24748.8%1733.4%4272.2%52
Texas Southern logo23-2416-17#274-7.424100.217107.646-6.911-3930+216230.1%59-44747.6%1431.6%1672.4%58
Texas Southern logo22-231614-21#310-10.91596.36107.240-5.814+7065-77731.0%69+352646.6%727.7%066.4%9
Texas Southern logo21-221619-13#187-1.54899.524101.070-6.313+15289-242833.0%87+92648.1%2231.4%1967.9%17
Texas Southern logo19-2016-16#280-8.62198.728107.318-4.826+3056-691031.5%80+262946.2%730.4%1270.6%47
Texas Southern logo18-1924-14#209-3.641104.649108.230-7.09+4660-273232.4%8404751.3%5732.4%2166.8%13
Texas Southern logo17-181616-20#223-4.537106.454110.921-5.413-6125+75428.4%44+223250.6%4135.8%6472.8%66
Texas Southern logo16-171623-12#208-3.041104.955107.931-7.57-9020+95631.5%70-628248.1%1729.6%373.5%80
Texas Southern logo15-1618-15#169-0.452107.064107.433-5.515+16889+95735.7%92+76951.7%7034.1%4263.2%3
Texas Southern logo14-151522-13#214-3.739103.757107.521-5.513-144-84333.8%73+253249.5%5432.2%2366.1%21
Texas Southern logo13-141618-15#243-5.831107.362113.18-10.01+10577-54533.8%72+80952.1%7836.0%7271.8%69

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
54.5%#154
Effective FG %
51.3%#154
3-Point %
32.4%#278
3PAR
35.8%#248
FTAR
41.5%#17
Assist %
54.6%#98

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
45.8%#8
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
21.5%#84
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

12 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 50.4% of shots at 0.90 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0950.4%0.90Middle (11–20s): 29.3% of shots at 1.31 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0429.3%1.31Late (21s+): 20.3% of shots at 1.22 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9720.3%1.22SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 50.9% of shots at 0.85 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0750.9%0.85Middle (11–20s): 30.6% of shots at 1.16 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0230.6%1.16Late (21s+): 18.4% of shots at 1.21 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9518.4%1.21SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

12 games
Created byFinished by
Jalyn Patterson → Jeremy Combs: 10 assisted baskets (7 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 0 from three)Jalyn Patterson → Devocio Butler: 8 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 7 from three)Jalyn Patterson → Eden Ewing: 5 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Jalyn Patterson → Trayvon Reed: 12 assisted baskets (9 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 2 from three)Jalyn Patterson → John Jones: 7 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 7 from three)Tyrik Armstrong → Jeremy Combs: 11 assisted baskets (9 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 1 from three)Tyrik Armstrong → Devocio Butler: 7 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 4 from three)Tyrik Armstrong → Eden Ewing: 5 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 1 from three)Devocio Butler → Jeremy Combs: 9 assisted baskets (8 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Devocio Butler → Eden Ewing: 5 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)Devocio Butler → John Jones: 4 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Devocio Butler → Jalyn Patterson: 5 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)John Jones → Jeremy Combs: 6 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)Eden Ewing → Jeremy Combs: 5 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Patterson42 astArmstrong23 astButler23 astJones6 astEwingCombs41 madeButler15 madeEwing15 madeReed12 madeJones11 madePatterson
Armstrong is the least-assisted finisher — 94% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.