Texas St.14-16

Sun BeltCoach: Terrence Johnson

14-16NET#193

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joshua O'Garro	1,469	464	76.0%	+10.686	−0.050	−10.692	−2.624	+7.798	+1.922	+7.286	−3.784	+3.382	+1.372	−7.386
Kaden Gumbs	1,266	668	65.5%	−5.532	+3.268	+8.610	+0.758	−1.636	−1.064	−3.630	+4.98	−4.812	+2.788	−4.774
Tylan Pope	1,260	674	65.2%	+9.984	+7.586	−2.462	−0.546	+5.692	−1.470	+4.878	−4.186	−2.230	+0.662	+5.720
Tyrel Morgan	1,062	871	54.9%	+16.296	+14.498	−1.860	+2.476	+11.2100	−2.078	−4.626	−6.896	−2.824	−2.514	−2.564
Christian Turner	1,028	905	53.2%	+0.252	−8.514	−8.788	+0.354	−2.330	+1.922	−4.826	+1.236	−0.942	+4.196	−8.790
Drue Drinnon	847	1,087	43.8%	−2.242	−0.648	+1.740	+2.980	−3.620	+0.442	−6.020	+2.820	+4.288	−2.912	+2.038
Dylan Dawson	807	1,126	41.8%	−0.848	−1.742	−0.954	−0.544	−7.06	−1.268	−5.124	+1.928	+2.878	+2.588	−0.250
Coleton Benson	634	1,299	32.8%	−15.08	−1.544	+13.62	+0.454	−8.24	−1.370	+9.192	+3.318	−0.744	−2.812	+19.12
Austin Green	478	1,455	24.7%	−5.232	−11.68	−6.482	−5.48	+0.354	+3.58	+5.178	−1.162	+1.062	+1.676	+3.032
Mark Drone	339	1,594	17.6%	+13.292	+9.492	−3.970	+0.758	+3.380	−4.896	+14.298	−7.196	−7.44	+0.154	+3.828
Nate Deer	227	1,706	11.8%	−4.932	−0.250	+4.724	+4.188	+1.968	+2.814	−3.930	+4.510	+9.2100	−4.44	−16.098
Bessanty Saragba	209	1,724	10.8%	−28.32	−18.02	+10.46	−4.314	−5.510	+2.120	−16.42	+6.14	+2.776	−4.54	−3.066

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joshua O'Garro	1,469	464	76.0%	1.850	111.054	109.244	49.7%40	37.9%76	19.1%32	38.7%72	48.7%58	67.4%42	16.8%48	40.6%22
Kaden Gumbs	1,266	668	65.5%	-2.742	112.156	114.830	50.6%46	35.6%68	18.3%36	35.7%66	51.3%48	64.9%34	17.4%52	40.8%22
Tylan Pope	1,260	674	65.2%	2.752	113.660	110.940	50.1%46	38.1%76	18.2%38	38.6%72	48.1%62	65.9%38	16.7%46	44.4%18
Tyrel Morgan	1,062	871	54.9%	6.658	117.570	110.940	51.3%50	41.0%84	17.8%40	35.0%64	46.7%68	65.5%36	15.3%38	41.3%22
Christian Turner	1,028	905	53.2%	-0.646	107.044	107.748	50.5%46	35.1%66	19.6%28	34.7%64	50.2%50	66.2%38	18.4%60	38.3%26
Drue Drinnon	847	1,087	43.8%	-2.044	110.754	112.636	51.9%52	34.1%64	18.9%32	33.6%60	51.2%48	69.0%50	14.9%34	43.5%18
Dylan Dawson	807	1,126	41.8%	-1.246	110.052	111.238	50.0%40	32.0%56	18.0%40	34.0%60	50.8%50	68.4%48	18.0%56	42.3%20
Coleton Benson	634	1,299	32.8%	-10.930	110.052	120.920	50.6%46	30.6%50	17.8%40	43.2%80	51.8%44	66.2%38	14.6%32	55.4%8
Austin Green	478	1,455	24.7%	-4.640	102.334	106.950	46.2%26	36.4%72	21.3%20	40.8%76	48.7%58	67.4%42	17.6%54	44.6%16
Mark Drone	339	1,594	17.6%	10.264	118.772	108.546	50.9%46	38.9%78	14.7%64	48.6%86	43.8%78	60.6%20	16.6%46	45.5%16
Nate Deer	227	1,706	11.8%	-5.138	110.854	115.928	53.9%62	37.8%76	21.1%20	33.5%60	53.5%36	74.8%76	12.6%20	28.3%52
Bessanty Saragba	209	1,724	10.8%	-25.912	95.020	120.920	46.4%28	31.3%52	20.5%24	22.4%26	55.0%30	69.0%50	12.5%18	39.7%24

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joshua O'Garro	1,469	464	76.0%	-8.832	111.054	119.820	52.3%54	30.3%48	17.2%44	31.5%54	52.4%40	64.1%30	15.5%38	47.9%14
Kaden Gumbs	1,266	668	65.5%	2.852	108.950	106.152	49.8%40	37.2%74	19.3%30	39.4%72	46.4%70	69.7%54	14.8%34	45.4%16
Tylan Pope	1,260	674	65.2%	-7.134	106.142	113.334	50.6%46	32.6%58	19.6%28	33.8%60	52.2%42	68.1%46	16.1%42	38.7%26
Tyrel Morgan	1,062	871	54.9%	-9.630	103.134	112.734	48.9%38	29.9%46	19.7%28	39.6%74	53.5%36	68.3%46	17.9%56	43.8%18
Christian Turner	1,028	905	53.2%	-0.946	115.566	116.428	50.1%46	37.4%74	17.7%42	39.5%74	49.0%58	67.1%42	14.3%30	47.0%14
Drue Drinnon	847	1,087	43.8%	0.246	111.254	111.040	49.0%38	37.7%76	18.5%36	39.6%74	48.3%60	64.8%34	17.8%56	41.5%20
Dylan Dawson	807	1,126	41.8%	-0.446	111.756	112.136	50.5%46	39.1%78	19.2%32	39.1%72	48.8%58	65.5%36	15.4%38	42.4%20
Coleton Benson	634	1,299	32.8%	4.254	111.556	107.350	50.2%46	38.8%78	19.1%32	34.1%62	48.6%60	66.9%42	17.4%52	36.4%30
Austin Green	478	1,455	24.7%	0.548	113.962	113.334	51.6%50	36.1%70	17.8%40	35.8%66	49.9%54	66.4%38	16.1%42	41.7%20
Mark Drone	339	1,594	17.6%	-3.042	109.450	112.436	50.2%46	35.6%68	19.5%28	34.4%62	50.9%50	68.0%46	16.5%44	41.7%20
Nate Deer	227	1,706	11.8%	-0.246	111.054	111.238	49.8%40	35.9%70	18.3%36	37.4%68	49.1%56	65.6%36	17.0%48	44.3%18
Bessanty Saragba	209	1,724	10.8%	2.452	112.960	110.640	50.8%46	36.8%72	18.4%36	38.8%72	48.9%58	66.3%38	17.0%48	42.7%20

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.