Towson19-14

CAACoach: Pat Skerry

19-14NET#145

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Christian May	1,393	426	76.6%	−9.820	−7.716	+2.038	−2.624	−4.516	+0.934	+9.192	+3.220	+2.876	−1.726	−5.678
Charles Thompson	1,309	509	72.0%	+4.166	+4.976	+0.844	+0.556	−1.638	−3.388	+3.068	−1.766	−3.024	−1.430	−4.674
Dylan Williamson	1,225	593	67.4%	−7.326	−3.532	+3.830	+0.152	−3.126	−0.862	−6.420	−0.454	−2.528	+1.674	+12.54
Tyler Tejada	1,052	766	57.9%	+0.752	+5.778	+5.024	+3.484	+3.882	−0.150	−6.618	+2.028	+1.768	−3.88	−2.362
Nendah Tarke	902	917	49.6%	+12.890	+8.990	−4.070	+1.364	−3.224	−5.396	+8.190	−3.078	+0.354	−1.036	+1.440
Tomiwa Sulaiman	842	977	46.3%	+15.794	+7.284	−8.586	+1.768	−2.032	−3.186	−0.848	−2.776	+0.354	+3.090	−1.858
Messiah Jones	766	1,053	42.1%	−14.610	−7.616	+7.016	−1.436	+1.766	+3.310	−3.432	+4.412	+1.262	−3.012	−13.896
Mekhi Lowery	744	1,074	40.9%	−1.146	−4.726	−3.668	−2.824	+4.586	+4.06	+2.164	−1.968	−2.628	+2.988	+5.522
Chase Paar	479	1,339	26.3%	−5.730	−5.224	+0.546	−0.148	+1.160	+3.510	−4.826	+2.426	+2.272	+1.270	+3.032
Tyler Coleman	192	1,627	10.6%	−4.734	−6.720	−2.060	−2.030	−1.934	+2.516	+1.962	−2.070	+0.960	+0.864	+11.56
Rahdir Hicks	120	1,699	6.6%	−2.740	−0.050	+2.634	+0.658	+1.766	+2.516	+2.868	−0.758	−3.620	+2.182	+3.332

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Christian May	1,393	426	76.6%	0.848	105.742	104.954	46.4%30	41.4%86	20.4%24	36.7%68	50.0%50	69.4%52	17.6%54	29.3%48
Charles Thompson	1,309	509	72.0%	4.354	108.950	104.654	47.2%32	42.1%88	19.2%30	35.2%64	48.8%56	68.0%46	17.6%54	29.3%48
Dylan Williamson	1,225	593	67.4%	0.748	106.444	105.752	47.1%32	41.5%86	19.9%26	32.3%58	49.2%56	67.9%44	18.5%62	34.9%32
Tyler Tejada	1,052	766	57.9%	3.452	110.052	106.650	48.5%38	44.1%92	20.1%24	31.7%56	50.2%50	69.5%52	16.4%46	29.6%46
Nendah Tarke	902	917	49.6%	9.664	112.058	102.460	47.8%34	40.9%86	17.5%42	38.5%70	47.8%62	68.9%50	17.5%54	31.3%42
Tomiwa Sulaiman	842	977	46.3%	11.466	111.456	100.066	48.0%36	41.4%86	18.5%36	34.0%60	47.9%62	68.9%50	19.6%68	29.6%46
Messiah Jones	766	1,053	42.1%	-5.538	103.236	108.644	46.3%28	43.5%90	22.1%16	32.4%58	51.9%42	69.5%52	16.2%46	22.6%70
Mekhi Lowery	744	1,074	40.9%	2.450	104.840	102.360	45.5%26	45.1%94	22.6%14	35.6%66	48.2%60	67.3%42	19.7%68	33.8%34
Chase Paar	479	1,339	26.3%	-1.144	103.738	104.854	47.0%32	43.4%90	22.7%14	30.9%52	51.1%46	70.4%56	18.9%64	32.8%38
Tyler Coleman	192	1,627	10.6%	-1.044	101.632	102.660	45.3%24	40.8%86	22.4%16	36.1%66	47.6%64	69.6%52	18.7%62	40.9%20
Rahdir Hicks	120	1,699	6.6%	0.648	107.546	106.948	47.7%34	44.2%92	22.5%14	37.0%68	48.7%58	65.4%36	20.0%70	33.6%34

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Christian May	1,393	426	76.6%	10.664	113.562	102.960	49.0%40	45.9%94	19.5%30	27.6%44	46.9%66	66.7%38	19.3%66	34.9%32
Charles Thompson	1,309	509	72.0%	0.246	104.138	103.956	46.7%30	43.7%90	22.6%14	32.2%56	50.6%48	70.9%58	19.0%64	33.9%34
Dylan Williamson	1,225	593	67.4%	8.060	109.952	101.962	47.0%32	44.6%92	20.7%22	38.7%72	49.6%54	70.5%56	17.0%50	22.4%70
Tyler Tejada	1,052	766	57.9%	2.752	104.238	101.662	45.1%24	40.4%84	20.2%24	38.3%70	48.1%60	67.8%44	20.2%72	31.9%40
Nendah Tarke	902	917	49.6%	-3.240	103.236	106.450	46.4%30	44.1%92	22.8%14	30.4%52	50.8%48	68.6%48	18.5%60	29.9%46
Tomiwa Sulaiman	842	977	46.3%	-4.340	104.238	108.544	46.3%28	43.5%90	21.6%18	34.8%62	50.6%48	68.6%48	16.6%48	31.4%42
Messiah Jones	766	1,053	42.1%	9.162	110.754	101.662	47.7%34	41.8%88	18.8%34	35.8%66	47.5%64	68.3%48	19.2%66	36.4%28
Mekhi Lowery	744	1,074	40.9%	3.552	109.552	105.950	48.2%36	40.6%84	18.5%36	33.5%60	50.1%50	69.9%54	16.8%48	28.3%50
Chase Paar	479	1,339	26.3%	4.654	108.950	104.356	47.1%32	42.3%88	19.3%30	35.6%66	48.7%58	68.2%46	17.7%56	29.8%46
Tyler Coleman	192	1,627	10.6%	3.652	108.348	104.654	47.3%32	42.7%88	19.9%26	34.2%62	49.5%54	68.7%48	17.9%56	29.4%48
Rahdir Hicks	120	1,699	6.6%	3.352	107.646	104.256	47.1%32	42.4%88	20.0%26	34.2%62	49.4%54	69.0%50	17.9%56	30.3%44

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.