Schedule
L
L
W
W
W
L
WW
W
WW
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
WWWWWWWLWLL
LWWWLWWWWWLLLWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWLWLLTeam Stats
31 games- Net Rating16.195
- Offensive Rating189.898
- Defensive Rating173.73
- Pace40.13
- Effective FG%54.6%91
- Off Rebound Pct24.4%11
- Turnover Pct27.1%5
- FT Attempt Rate34.4%43
Team Stats
31 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating16.195
- Offensive Rating189.898
- Defensive Rating173.73
- Pace40.13
- Effective FG%54.6%91
- Off Rebound Pct24.4%11
- Turnover Pct27.1%5
- FT Attempt Rate34.4%43
Results & Margin
- Win Pct67.7%84
- Point Margin / Game6.585
- Points / Game76.175
- Points Allowed / Game69.673
- 1st Half Margin3.181
- 2nd Half Margin3.487
- Avg Largest Lead10.957
- Avg Largest Deficit10.353
Box Score
- Points / Game76.175
- Rebounds / Game31.46
- Assists / Game14.879
- ORebs / Game8.07
- DRebs / Game23.419
- Steals / Game8.296
- Blocks / Game1.95
- Turnovers / Game10.994
- PFs / Game16.292
Shooting
- FGMs / Game26.676
- FGAs / Game55.928
- Field Goal Pct47.6%92
- 2PMs / Game18.967
- 2PAs / Game36.144
- 2-Point Pct52.2%85
- 3PMs / Game7.761
- 3PAs / Game19.735
- 3-Point Pct39.2%95
- FTMs / Game13.129
- FTAs / Game19.233
- Free Throw Pct68.0%27
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s49.6%46
- % Pts from 3s30.5%50
- % Pts from FTs17.2%14
- Paint Pts / Game14.624
- % Pts in Paint19.2%20
- Fast Break Pts / Game2.628
- % Pts on Fast Break3.5%26
- Points off TOVs / Game8.521
- % Pts off TOVs11.1%18
- 1st Half Pts / Game34.660
- 2nd Half Pts / Game39.672
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %59.1%95
- Points / Shot1.3692
- 3-Point Att Rate35.3%42
- Assist Pct55.6%72
- Assists / 100 Poss36.999
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.36x94
- PF Drawn / Game17.113
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%52.6%24
- Opp True Shooting %57.0%17
- Opp Field Goal Pct45.7%29
- Opp 2-Point Pct51.6%28
- Opp 3-Point Pct36.2%30
- Opp 3PA Rate38.0%33
- Opp FT Att Rate31.4%77
- Opp Points / Shot1.3032
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game69.673
- Paint Pts Allowed13.780
- Fast Break Pts Allowed2.380
- Pts off TOVs Allowed5.690
- Opp Assist Pct55.2%27
- TOVs Forced / Game15.293
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct72.6%74
- Turnovers Forced Pct38.0%99
- Steal Pct20.4%99
- Block Pct4.7%44
- Hakeem Pct25.0%99
- PF Efficiency0.95x72
- Steals / PF0.50x99
- Blocks / PF0.12x15
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 350 D-I teams- #17TOV%15.6%
- #183P%39.2%
- #19TS%58.5%
- #24Opp TOV%21.7%
- #33eFG%54.6%
- #55Pts Diff+200
- #92Opp OREB%27.4%
- #98AST%55.6%
Where they rank bestof 350 D-I teams
- #17TOV%15.6%
- #183P%39.2%
- #19TS%58.5%
- #24Opp TOV%21.7%
- #33eFG%54.6%
- #55Pts Diff+200
- #92Opp OREB%27.4%
- #98AST%55.6%
Where they rank worstof 350 D-I teams
- #309OREB%24.4%
- #300SOS-5.0
- #262Opp eFG%52.6%
- #256REB Diff-69
- #242Opp 3P%36.2%
- #200FTAR34.4%
- #1393PM Diff+11
- #115Adj DRtg101.9
Most Similar Seasons
to 2016-17- 1
Bradley 2025-2620-13MVCMost alike in Tempo, Adj D, Adj O91 - 2
Richmond 2020-2113-9A10Most alike in Opp eFG%, 3PA rate, TOV%87 - 3
East Tennessee St.ETSU 2025-2621-11SouthernMost alike in eFG%, 3PA rate, Adj D86 - 4
Temple 2018-1923-10AmericanMost alike in 3PA rate, FT rate, TOV%83 - 5Richmond 2025-2614-17A10Most alike in Tempo, Adj O, OREB%79
- 6
Penn St. 2025-2612-20Big 10Most alike in OREB%, Tempo, 3PA rate79 - 7
Charleston 2018-1923-9CAAMost alike in eFG%, TOV%, Adj D79 - 8
Montana 2018-1924-9Big SkyMost alike in Adj D, FT rate, 3PA rate78 - 9
UMKC 2021-2215-12SummitMost alike in Opp eFG%, Opp OREB%, Opp TOV%78 - 10
Albany 2020-217-9America EastMost alike in Tempo, OREB%, Opp eFG%78
Schedule
Loading the schedule
MaCioTeagueFrATAhmadThomasJrDRDavidRobertsonSrWWWillWeeksSrKVKevinVannattaJrAWAlecWnukJrRMRaekwonMillerJrGZGiacomoZilliSr
MSMalikSmithFrDRDrewRackleyFr
JonathanBaehreFrJBJustinBrownFr
GTGrantTownsendFr
| M. TeagueMaCio Teague | Fr | 6'3" | +1.083 | – | – | 60.0%78 | 19.8%62 | 15.4 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 45.3% | 89.3% |
| A. ThomasAhmad Thomas | Jr | 6'3" | +0.877 | – | – | 58.3%71 | 26.3%92 | 18.0 | 6.6 | 2.3 | 46.2% | 57.8% |
| D. RobertsonDavid Robertson | Sr | 6'3" | +0.153 | – | – | 66.1%91 | 15.7%33 | 7.7 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 45.3% | 81.3% |
| W. WeeksWill Weeks | Sr | 6'6" | +0.049 | – | – | 53.6%48 | 17.0%42 | 6.5 | 4.8 | 2.3 | 0.0% | 56.4% |
| K. VannattaKevin Vannatta | Jr | 6'2" | -0.338 | – | – | 53.3%46 | 16.7%40 | 9.1 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 30.0% | 71.6% |
| A. WnukAlec Wnuk | Jr | 6'6" | -0.721 | – | – | 55.9%60 | 22.3%78 | 7.3 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 30.0% | 59.3% |
| R. MillerRaekwon Miller | Jr | 6'3" | -0.721 | – | – | 52.2%41 | 20.0%64 | 6.6 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 29.3% | 78.0% |
| G. ZilliGiacomo Zilli | Sr | 6'9" | – | – | – | 60.7%81 | 23.2%82 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.0% | 69.2% |
| M. SmithMalik Smith | Fr | 6'6" | – | – | – | 50.4%33 | 16.1%36 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.0% | 60.0% |
| D. RackleyDrew Rackley | Fr | 6'2" | – | – | – | 64.8%90 | 16.9%42 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 41.4% | 63.6% |
| J. BaehreJonathan Baehre | Fr | 6'9" | – | – | – | 52.4%42 | 20.3%66 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 50.0% | 44.4% |
| J. BrownJustin Brown | Fr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 92.1%98 | 30.3%98 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 40.0% | 100.0% |
| G. TownsendGrant Townsend | Fr | 6'7" | – | – | – | 51.5%38 | 21.7%75 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 25.0% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 15-17 | #225 | -5.037 | 106.533 | 111.540 | -3.541 | +3855 | -442 | 31.3%53 | +3622 | 51.7%49 | 34.9%66 | 68.7%16 |
| 24-25 | 21-11 | #205 | -1.749 | 111.373 | 113.020 | -5.324 | -4027 | +954 | 31.3%58 | -10494 | 53.7%81 | 34.8%64 | 71.6%43 |
| 23-24 | 22-12 | #171 | 1.057 | 108.965 | 107.943 | -2.945 | -2036 | +3774 | 28.1%37 | -3064 | 53.6%84 | 36.5%89 | 74.2%76 |
| 22-2315 | 27-8 | #145 | 2.662 | 105.452 | 102.769 | -3.332 | +2351 | +5784 | 26.3%28 | +5018 | 54.7%94 | 38.8%98 | 69.4%26 |
| 21-22 | 17-15 | #203 | 0.656 | 106.163 | 105.443 | -5.125 | -6024 | +8494 | 27.8%45 | -3971 | 53.0%82 | 36.3%86 | 72.6%60 |
| 19-20 | 15-16 | #283 | -8.820 | 100.135 | 108.912 | -8.43 | -1774 | +4980 | 24.3%17 | -16199 | 52.5%83 | 34.6%70 | 66.0%11 |
| 18-19 | 4-27 | #349 | -23.11 | 92.74 | 115.82 | -2.045 | -1426 | -4816 | 29.1%55 | +905 | 47.1%9 | 32.5%23 | 74.1%82 |
| 17-18 | 21-13 | #184 | -0.849 | 106.253 | 107.144 | -2.048 | +3757 | +1758 | 25.6%19 | +2231 | 54.7%88 | 39.4%94 | 74.1%80 |
| 16-17 | 23-10 | #103 | 4.970 | 106.965 | 102.068 | -5.414 | -3631 | +1661 | 25.0%12 | -15499 | 54.9%91 | 39.6%95 | 67.9%25 |
| 15-1615 | 20-12 | #128 | 4.566 | 103.547 | 99.083 | -2.736 | +7569 | -1042 | 31.9%69 | -8690 | 50.5%55 | 32.3%19 | 69.4%46 |
| 14-15 | 12-16 | #241 | -5.133 | 101.141 | 106.230 | -5.315 | +2555 | +3377 | 32.5%64 | +2630 | 50.5%69 | 35.7%69 | 72.5%83 |
| 13-14 | 14-15 | #233 | -4.933 | 107.361 | 112.212 | -4.922 | +9676 | +855 | 35.5%87 | +5416 | 51.7%75 | 37.1%81 | 74.5%93 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
58.5%#18
Effective FG %
54.6%#31
3-Point %
39.2%#17
3PAR
35.3%#201
FTAR
34.4%#199
Assist %
55.6%#96
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
34.6%#189
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
30.2%#213
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
14 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0470D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.693547.2% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.346031.6% of shots
Late 21s+1.379221.2% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0623Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.619239.8% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.343630.6% of shots
Late 21s+1.37929.6% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 343 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 16-17. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 16-17. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.