UNC Greensboro19-11

SouthernCoach: Mike Jones

19-11NET#141

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Keyshaun Langley	1,411	440	76.2%	+10.684	+7.384	−3.366	+2.576	−0.350	−3.186	+0.756	−1.564	−1.636	+3.390	+7.812
Donovan Atwell	1,380	471	74.5%	+17.596	+10.794	−6.882	+1.870	+4.486	−3.790	+2.766	−2.876	−0.348	+1.978	−2.262
Kobe Langley	1,356	495	73.3%	+4.970	+2.764	−2.260	−5.48	+4.786	−4.796	+2.466	+1.830	−3.124	+4.596	−5.878
Mikeal Brown-Jones	1,204	647	65.0%	+15.594	+16.7100	+1.242	+5.494	−0.448	−3.992	+9.492	−0.858	−4.912	+0.762	+0.048
Jalen Breath	1,014	837	54.8%	+8.980	+8.288	−0.752	+4.490	+7.696	+0.048	−2.438	+0.446	+1.768	−0.740	−10.090
Joryam Saizonou	916	936	49.5%	−12.014	−2.538	+9.68	+1.970	−2.430	+3.68	+4.878	+1.434	−0.446	−5.34	+3.728
Tim Ceaser	651	1,200	35.2%	+2.460	−7.218	−9.590	−2.228	−1.836	+1.428	−8.114	−1.262	+3.480	+2.584	−9.188
Akrum Ahemed	475	1,377	25.6%	−10.418	−13.06	−2.662	−2.128	−7.94	+2.714	−4.128	−0.858	+2.474	−0.642	+4.924
Miles Jones	419	1,433	22.6%	−31.02	−16.74	+14.32	−9.82	−0.250	+1.822	−3.334	+5.48	−2.726	−1.824	+11.56
Domas Kauzonas	225	1,627	12.1%	−4.334	−13.06	−8.686	−2.030	−8.34	+1.724	−8.312	−7.096	+2.876	−4.26	+1.242
Muon Reath	147	1,704	7.9%	−20.36	−15.84	+4.526	−0.942	−5.014	+9.20	+11.396	+3.020	+7.898	−1.036	+7.812

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Keyshaun Langley	1,411	440	76.2%	6.258	114.364	108.146	53.7%62	31.8%56	16.0%52	27.4%42	49.1%56	64.7%32	19.3%66	37.2%26
Donovan Atwell	1,380	471	74.5%	8.160	115.266	107.148	53.5%62	33.0%58	15.8%54	27.9%44	48.8%56	65.0%34	19.0%64	34.7%32
Kobe Langley	1,356	495	73.3%	4.956	113.260	108.346	51.7%54	33.0%58	15.5%56	27.9%44	50.0%54	64.2%30	19.7%68	33.6%34
Mikeal Brown-Jones	1,204	647	65.0%	9.162	118.472	109.342	55.0%68	31.8%54	15.4%58	30.6%52	49.2%54	63.4%28	18.7%62	35.2%32
Jalen Breath	1,014	837	54.8%	7.660	116.268	108.644	55.0%68	35.3%70	16.8%48	26.2%38	49.7%54	65.9%36	18.2%60	30.9%44
Joryam Saizonou	916	936	49.5%	-2.542	111.356	113.832	54.1%64	30.6%50	18.6%36	29.8%50	50.2%48	64.9%34	15.8%42	37.1%26
Tim Ceaser	651	1,200	35.2%	5.256	107.948	102.760	51.7%54	30.8%50	17.7%42	22.0%28	48.7%58	67.3%42	20.1%70	29.2%48
Akrum Ahemed	475	1,377	25.6%	-4.240	102.836	107.048	51.5%52	26.0%30	18.8%34	24.1%34	48.9%56	66.9%42	18.1%58	38.8%24
Miles Jones	419	1,433	22.6%	-20.418	99.628	120.020	45.5%26	31.8%54	18.2%38	24.7%34	53.7%34	62.9%26	17.1%52	44.2%16
Domas Kauzonas	225	1,627	12.1%	-0.246	101.132	101.364	51.3%50	24.6%26	18.3%38	19.9%22	43.4%80	67.5%44	14.9%36	36.3%28
Muon Reath	147	1,704	7.9%	-15.024	98.026	113.034	52.3%56	27.3%36	25.2%8	37.8%70	52.3%40	72.3%66	17.6%54	42.4%18

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Keyshaun Langley	1,411	440	76.2%	-4.440	106.946	111.438	51.2%50	32.2%56	19.1%32	26.7%40	50.6%48	66.3%38	16.0%44	29.4%48
Donovan Atwell	1,380	471	74.5%	-9.432	104.640	113.932	51.7%54	28.6%42	19.5%28	25.2%36	51.6%44	65.3%34	17.1%52	36.8%28
Kobe Langley	1,356	495	73.3%	0.046	110.554	110.540	57.1%76	28.3%40	20.2%24	25.4%36	48.2%60	67.3%42	15.2%38	39.5%22
Mikeal Brown-Jones	1,204	647	65.0%	-6.536	101.632	108.146	49.6%42	32.1%56	19.3%30	21.2%24	50.0%54	68.3%48	18.1%58	35.2%32
Jalen Breath	1,014	837	54.8%	-1.344	108.048	109.344	50.6%48	27.7%38	16.7%48	28.6%46	49.3%54	64.1%30	18.9%64	40.9%20
Joryam Saizonou	916	936	49.5%	9.564	113.762	104.256	52.2%56	33.0%58	15.0%60	25.0%36	48.8%56	65.3%34	21.1%76	33.3%34
Tim Ceaser	651	1,200	35.2%	2.852	115.064	112.236	53.8%64	32.6%58	16.2%52	30.1%50	49.9%54	63.9%30	17.7%56	38.4%24
Akrum Ahemed	475	1,377	25.6%	6.358	115.968	109.642	53.6%62	33.9%64	16.1%52	28.3%46	49.7%54	64.5%32	18.7%62	34.0%34
Miles Jones	419	1,433	22.6%	10.664	116.368	105.752	55.3%70	31.9%56	16.3%50	28.0%44	48.3%60	65.7%36	18.9%64	32.7%38
Domas Kauzonas	225	1,627	12.1%	4.254	114.162	109.940	53.3%60	32.9%58	16.5%50	28.2%46	50.4%48	64.7%32	19.0%64	35.1%32
Muon Reath	147	1,704	7.9%	5.356	113.862	108.546	53.1%60	32.3%56	16.0%52	26.5%40	49.3%54	64.5%32	18.6%62	34.6%32

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

UNC GreensboroUNCG19-11

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

UNC Greensboro19-11