USC17-14

Big 10Coach: Eric Musselman

17-14NET#91

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jacob Cofie	1,585	538	74.6%	+16.596	+7.588	−9.090	+2.980	+6.094	+0.638	+7.286	−4.388	+5.694	−1.034	+2.236
Ezra Ausar	1,547	576	72.9%	−5.730	−0.150	+5.520	+0.252	+1.264	−0.048	−6.618	+4.88	+4.390	−0.934	−6.380
Chad Baker-Mazara	1,249	875	58.8%	+15.494	+6.784	−8.790	+5.092	+1.566	+1.328	−2.836	−5.292	+0.254	+0.764	−1.056
Kam Woods	1,036	1,087	48.8%	−14.110	−6.618	+7.412	−4.016	+5.090	+1.328	−9.98	+6.04	+2.476	−1.920	−7.586
Jordan Marsh	851	1,272	40.1%	+1.658	+0.956	−0.754	+1.566	−3.718	−0.150	+3.270	−1.162	−0.842	+0.660	+8.410
Jerry Easter II	833	1,290	39.2%	−4.036	−0.746	+3.330	−0.544	−4.316	+0.934	+11.896	−0.050	−2.426	−1.328	+5.520
Alijah Arenas	685	1,439	32.2%	−7.026	−2.536	+4.524	−2.526	+2.272	−0.354	−2.636	+1.432	−0.544	−2.414	−9.590
Terrance Williams II	626	1,498	29.5%	−10.216	−2.636	+7.612	−2.128	−0.546	−0.558	−8.112	+5.08	−3.320	+1.778	+1.044
Jaden Brownell	610	1,513	28.7%	+1.256	+1.258	−0.050	+2.172	−6.48	−1.370	−2.238	−3.280	−4.016	−0.738	+7.114
Gabe Dynes	563	1,560	26.5%	−3.638	−9.112	−5.578	−6.06	+1.364	+0.836	+2.062	+0.246	+6.596	−0.150	−6.382
Ryan Cornish	444	1,680	20.9%	−6.428	−2.040	+4.324	−1.038	+1.568	+0.442	−3.034	+2.424	−3.518	+2.790	+11.26
Rodney Rice	307	1,816	14.5%	+19.998	+9.892	−10.192	+3.484	−3.322	−5.498	+12.096	−4.890	−4.812	+4.298	−10.692
Amarion Dickerson	246	1,878	11.6%	+16.696	+8.190	−8.588	+7.798	−3.024	+0.146	+11.896	−6.394	−3.320	+2.688	+3.628

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jacob Cofie	1,585	538	74.6%	2.550	108.844	106.252	50.9%44	33.3%62	17.2%38	45.4%76	48.4%62	68.7%44	16.0%50	34.4%42
Ezra Ausar	1,547	576	72.9%	-3.240	106.840	110.044	50.2%42	32.0%58	17.0%40	41.8%70	50.9%50	68.5%42	16.0%50	32.1%48
Chad Baker-Mazara	1,249	875	58.8%	4.754	109.648	104.956	52.2%50	32.3%60	17.5%36	42.4%70	47.4%66	67.4%38	16.6%54	33.4%44
Kam Woods	1,036	1,087	48.8%	-8.832	103.532	112.338	48.2%32	34.1%66	17.7%34	38.6%62	52.6%42	68.6%44	15.3%44	30.1%54
Jordan Marsh	851	1,272	40.1%	-0.744	107.442	108.148	51.0%44	29.4%48	16.9%40	45.5%76	48.9%60	66.8%38	16.6%54	39.0%32
Jerry Easter II	833	1,290	39.2%	-4.038	106.440	110.542	49.8%36	29.0%46	17.5%36	50.9%84	49.5%58	65.8%32	15.5%44	37.1%36
Alijah Arenas	685	1,439	32.2%	-6.434	105.236	111.640	48.5%32	33.1%62	16.8%42	41.8%70	50.5%52	67.0%38	14.6%38	27.4%62
Terrance Williams II	626	1,498	29.5%	-8.832	105.036	113.834	48.7%34	31.3%56	16.6%42	37.9%62	53.0%40	64.9%28	17.5%60	34.5%42
Jaden Brownell	610	1,513	28.7%	-0.844	107.742	108.548	51.6%46	27.1%38	16.1%48	42.0%70	47.2%68	64.5%28	15.8%48	38.9%32
Gabe Dynes	563	1,560	26.5%	-4.338	100.226	104.556	45.7%22	32.6%60	17.6%36	45.0%76	49.7%58	72.0%60	16.2%50	29.2%58
Ryan Cornish	444	1,680	20.9%	-6.734	105.236	111.940	49.3%36	32.9%62	17.4%36	41.1%68	51.5%48	64.5%28	18.4%66	42.7%24
Rodney Rice	307	1,816	14.5%	15.472	115.262	99.968	53.0%54	28.9%46	12.4%74	53.8%86	45.4%74	63.3%24	19.9%76	24.8%70
Amarion Dickerson	246	1,878	11.6%	13.168	114.058	101.066	57.0%72	29.0%46	17.1%38	54.1%86	44.0%80	64.4%28	18.5%68	37.0%36

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jacob Cofie	1,585	538	74.6%	-14.024	101.228	115.232	48.0%30	27.3%40	16.5%44	38.1%62	52.7%42	63.1%22	17.0%56	32.1%48
Ezra Ausar	1,547	576	72.9%	2.450	106.940	104.556	50.0%36	30.8%52	17.0%40	48.4%80	46.0%72	64.2%26	17.0%56	38.4%32
Chad Baker-Mazara	1,249	875	58.8%	-10.728	102.932	113.634	47.2%28	30.8%54	16.2%46	45.1%76	52.6%42	67.1%38	15.9%48	34.4%42
Kam Woods	1,036	1,087	48.8%	5.254	110.148	104.956	52.2%50	29.1%46	16.4%44	48.5%80	46.5%70	66.1%32	17.2%58	37.5%34
Jordan Marsh	851	1,272	40.1%	-2.342	106.540	108.846	49.6%36	33.1%62	17.1%40	42.3%70	50.0%58	67.6%38	16.1%50	30.6%54
Jerry Easter II	833	1,290	39.2%	-0.146	107.140	107.250	50.3%42	33.3%62	16.7%42	39.1%64	49.5%58	68.3%42	16.8%56	31.6%50
Alijah Arenas	685	1,439	32.2%	0.646	107.742	107.150	51.0%44	30.9%54	17.1%38	44.4%74	49.1%58	67.4%38	17.1%58	37.0%36
Terrance Williams II	626	1,498	29.5%	1.448	107.642	106.252	50.8%42	31.8%58	17.2%38	46.0%76	48.1%64	68.2%42	15.8%48	33.5%44
Jaden Brownell	610	1,513	28.7%	-2.042	106.540	108.548	49.6%36	33.5%66	17.4%36	44.2%74	50.5%52	68.5%42	16.5%52	31.8%50
Gabe Dynes	563	1,560	26.5%	-0.744	109.346	110.044	51.7%48	31.3%56	16.8%42	43.0%72	49.5%58	65.6%32	16.3%50	35.5%40
Ryan Cornish	444	1,680	20.9%	-0.344	107.342	107.650	50.4%42	31.3%56	16.9%40	44.2%74	49.0%60	68.0%40	15.7%46	31.5%50
Rodney Rice	307	1,816	14.5%	-4.538	105.436	110.044	49.7%36	32.1%60	17.8%34	41.8%70	50.3%52	68.0%40	15.7%46	35.4%40
Amarion Dickerson	246	1,878	11.6%	-3.640	105.938	109.544	49.3%36	32.0%58	17.0%40	42.3%70	50.2%52	67.7%38	16.0%48	33.4%44

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.