Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley12-15

Southland

12-15NET#240

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
DK Thorn+7.076−1.146−8.086+0.758−6.38−0.658−1.940−2.978−2.924+3.594−3.668
Cliff Davis−14.210−2.538+11.64+2.576−8.62−0.556−8.710+4.310−6.56+0.458−5.378
Trey Miller+17.396+8.490−8.988+6.196−2.430−0.964+3.170−5.994−0.348−0.050−2.464
Howie Fleming Jr.+12.690+8.088−4.674+1.164+5.390−0.760+7.186−4.288+3.280−3.48−3.870
Kwo Agwa−14.710−3.532+11.26+0.354−7.26+0.442+1.158+4.310−2.030−4.34−14.696
K.T. Raimey+1.758+0.554−1.256−1.832+6.796+0.836−0.350+0.246−0.744+1.576+6.118
Marshal Destremau+2.560+0.454−2.160−2.228+5.090−0.760+0.354−1.364+1.264+0.256+2.834
Hasan Abdul Hakim+6.174+12.598+6.418+2.172+7.998−2.786+2.164+3.316+3.582−1.724+7.414
Jaylen Washington−17.86−17.34+0.546−8.14−4.118+1.626−0.946+1.830−1.140+2.486+4.326
Tommy Gankhuyag+18.598+4.574−14.096+5.194+0.456+1.232−6.816−1.162+5.994+5.9100−0.754
RJ Nance−49.30−28.42+20.80−10.92−0.150+7.30−6.716+7.22+1.868−5.72+19.70

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
DK Thorn-2.244106.844109.04452.5%5631.6%5219.4%3021.8%2650.9%5063.4%2819.0%6428.6%52
Cliff Davis-6.736106.542113.33453.0%5831.0%5019.5%3020.3%2252.5%4062.6%2618.3%6028.2%52
Trey Miller0.748109.250108.54654.0%6232.3%5619.3%3023.1%2850.1%5063.9%3018.2%5828.8%52
Howie Fleming Jr.0.348109.650109.24452.8%5634.7%6619.3%3024.5%3250.3%5065.0%3417.1%5028.2%54
Kwo Agwa-12.328105.040117.32652.6%5628.6%4219.8%2622.9%2854.0%3462.9%2615.7%4021.2%74
K.T. Raimey-2.642107.446110.04251.4%5036.8%7220.0%2622.1%2651.7%4463.6%2819.1%6433.1%38
Marshal Destremau-2.144107.446109.44451.0%4836.1%7019.1%3222.5%2850.7%5064.8%3418.4%6031.2%44
Hasan Abdul Hakim0.848116.066115.33053.9%6238.4%7617.6%4223.8%3054.0%3466.5%3817.0%5034.7%34
Jaylen Washington-17.52093.618111.13846.1%2629.9%4620.8%2221.6%2453.0%3863.2%2820.1%7032.7%40
Tommy Gankhuyag11.866110.85499.07056.6%7433.3%6220.5%2216.6%1250.6%5069.1%5023.2%8628.8%52
RJ Nance-48.9481.06129.8842.3%1632.9%5826.3%416.1%1258.2%1865.7%3613.1%2247.5%14

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
DK Thorn-9.132107.946117.02651.9%5237.9%7620.1%2623.8%3053.9%3466.3%3815.5%3832.1%42
Cliff Davis7.460109.150101.66450.4%4639.5%8020.0%2629.1%4648.2%6269.0%5017.9%5633.5%38
Trey Miller-16.722100.830117.42647.9%3234.7%6620.2%2420.0%2056.0%2664.3%3018.2%5831.2%44
Howie Fleming Jr.-12.328101.632113.93251.6%5029.4%4420.1%2617.4%1454.4%3261.8%2220.5%7232.0%42
Kwo Agwa2.452108.548106.15252.3%5435.8%7019.4%3021.8%2649.7%5664.8%3420.0%7035.7%32
K.T. Raimey-4.440106.944111.23853.1%5830.1%4819.3%3022.4%2651.5%4664.3%3217.6%5426.9%56
Marshal Destremau-4.640106.944111.53853.2%5831.2%5219.8%2622.1%2652.0%4463.6%2818.2%5828.4%52
Hasan Abdul Hakim-5.438103.636108.94451.8%5230.5%4820.3%2421.6%2450.7%5063.1%2618.7%6227.3%56
Jaylen Washington0.348110.954110.64054.2%6233.9%6219.2%3022.5%2851.2%4864.3%3017.7%5428.4%52
Tommy Gankhuyag-6.736106.342113.13451.5%5032.9%5819.4%3023.4%3051.7%4463.1%2617.3%5229.5%50
RJ Nance0.448109.450109.04453.3%6033.0%5819.0%3222.8%2851.0%4863.9%3018.7%6227.8%54
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.