Utah St.25-8

MWCCoach: Jerrod Calhoun

25-8NET#47

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Mason Falslev	1,747	382	82.0%	−11.416	+2.564	+13.92	+3.584	−1.438	+1.922	+9.092	+5.74	−2.030	−1.724	+8.012
Ian Martinez	1,626	504	76.4%	−1.246	+2.364	+3.530	−0.644	+3.480	−0.354	+7.888	+1.532	+3.582	−1.724	+7.812
Dexter Akanno	1,345	785	63.2%	+9.284	+2.666	−6.682	+2.476	−2.726	+0.442	+7.588	−1.666	+2.978	+1.982	+0.248
Drake Allen	1,015	1,115	47.6%	+7.278	+7.686	+0.448	+1.364	+1.566	−2.886	+9.192	+1.334	+0.454	−0.936	−6.280
Deyton Albury	1,012	1,118	47.5%	−7.524	−9.810	−2.362	−7.24	+1.566	+0.344	+0.454	−3.382	+0.860	−1.920	−2.564
Aubin Gateretse	940	1,190	44.1%	+1.456	−0.648	−1.960	+4.188	−1.042	+3.96	−3.234	−0.960	−0.150	−1.132	−12.496
Karson Templin	886	1,243	41.6%	+0.352	−2.140	−2.462	−5.110	−0.448	−3.692	+1.964	+0.938	+2.978	+1.678	+0.646
Tucker Anderson	855	1,275	40.1%	+1.356	+0.454	−0.954	−0.148	−1.240	−2.686	−14.22	−1.566	−0.248	−2.020	−5.980
Jordy Barnes	576	1,553	27.1%	−6.028	−2.438	+3.730	+3.584	−3.124	+3.48	−9.110	+2.820	−3.818	+4.598	+14.34
Isaac Johnson	414	1,716	19.4%	+0.452	−6.022	−6.582	−2.228	+2.574	+1.824	−13.44	−5.192	−3.122	+0.460	−8.688
Isaac Davis	175	1,955	8.2%	−2.840	+10.094	+12.84	+5.294	+2.474	+0.246	+10.994	+8.50	−4.514	+1.270	+36.00

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Mason Falslev	1,747	382	82.0%	12.068	121.778	109.842	56.1%72	37.8%76	16.8%48	38.9%72	52.9%38	66.3%38	20.2%72	37.3%28
Ian Martinez	1,626	504	76.4%	13.770	121.878	108.146	55.3%68	38.8%78	16.4%52	39.0%72	52.2%42	67.6%44	20.1%70	37.8%28
Dexter Akanno	1,345	785	63.2%	17.476	122.280	104.954	56.4%72	37.0%74	16.6%50	40.1%74	51.3%48	67.8%44	21.3%76	36.0%32
Drake Allen	1,015	1,115	47.6%	17.876	125.384	107.548	56.1%72	38.8%78	15.0%62	41.9%78	52.5%40	66.9%42	20.1%70	32.7%40
Deyton Albury	1,012	1,118	47.5%	10.064	116.266	106.152	51.7%52	38.8%78	16.6%50	37.4%68	50.2%50	67.1%42	19.5%66	34.6%36
Aubin Gateretse	940	1,190	44.1%	14.872	121.076	106.252	57.8%78	37.4%74	18.6%36	35.4%64	51.4%46	66.7%38	19.9%70	29.1%50
Karson Templin	886	1,243	41.6%	14.170	120.176	105.952	52.6%56	37.8%76	14.3%68	38.3%70	52.4%42	68.4%48	21.5%78	36.2%30
Tucker Anderson	855	1,275	40.1%	14.872	121.678	106.850	55.4%68	37.3%74	14.9%64	29.0%46	50.9%50	66.6%38	19.4%66	32.4%40
Jordy Barnes	576	1,553	27.1%	9.664	119.674	110.042	58.0%78	35.7%70	18.9%32	30.5%52	54.0%34	63.9%30	23.8%88	46.6%14
Isaac Johnson	414	1,716	19.4%	14.370	116.468	102.162	53.7%62	40.1%82	17.9%40	26.5%40	47.8%64	64.3%32	20.9%76	29.0%50
Isaac Davis	175	1,955	8.2%	11.366	130.590	119.222	60.3%86	40.2%82	16.6%50	47.3%84	59.7%14	62.5%24	21.6%78	69.5%2

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Mason Falslev	1,747	382	82.0%	23.484	119.374	95.976	52.6%56	39.2%80	14.9%64	29.9%50	47.2%66	68.3%46	21.9%80	29.3%50
Ian Martinez	1,626	504	76.4%	14.972	119.674	104.656	55.9%70	35.4%68	16.7%48	31.3%54	50.7%50	64.1%30	21.9%80	30.0%48
Dexter Akanno	1,345	785	63.2%	8.262	119.774	111.538	53.9%62	39.7%80	16.2%52	32.5%58	52.8%40	64.9%34	19.3%66	35.7%32
Drake Allen	1,015	1,115	47.6%	10.564	117.770	107.150	54.8%66	37.3%74	17.8%42	32.8%58	51.2%48	66.6%38	21.0%76	38.9%26
Deyton Albury	1,012	1,118	47.5%	17.676	125.984	108.446	58.9%82	37.3%74	16.3%52	37.0%68	53.4%36	66.3%38	21.5%78	37.1%28
Aubin Gateretse	940	1,190	44.1%	13.470	121.678	108.246	53.7%62	38.4%76	14.7%64	38.5%72	52.3%42	66.8%42	21.0%76	41.5%20
Karson Templin	886	1,243	41.6%	13.870	122.280	108.346	57.6%78	38.2%76	17.9%40	36.3%66	51.5%46	65.5%36	19.8%68	35.6%32
Tucker Anderson	855	1,275	40.1%	13.570	121.178	107.748	55.5%68	38.5%78	17.5%42	43.1%78	52.5%40	66.8%42	21.3%78	38.3%26
Jordy Barnes	576	1,553	27.1%	15.672	121.978	106.352	54.5%64	38.8%78	15.5%58	39.6%74	51.2%48	67.7%44	19.4%66	32.3%40
Isaac Johnson	414	1,716	19.4%	13.970	122.580	108.646	55.9%70	37.6%76	16.1%54	39.9%74	52.9%38	67.4%42	20.5%72	37.6%28
Isaac Davis	175	1,955	8.2%	14.170	120.576	106.352	55.1%66	37.9%76	16.4%52	36.3%66	51.3%48	67.0%42	20.5%72	33.5%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.