Utah Valley22-9

WACCoach: Todd Phillips

22-9NET#89

Poss2,114

Net Rtg10.764

ORtg110.650

DRtg99.968

Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,114	979	10.764	110.650	99.968	54.9%62	35.1%70	20.2%20	37.9%62	49.2%58	68.7%44	21.7%84	38.3%32
HendricksT. HendricksLeonhardtT. LeonhardtHolcombeJ. HolcombeTaitzN. TaitzDavisI. Davis	261	123	10.864	105.036	94.278	51.7%48	33.1%62	21.1%16	39.6%64	50.3%52	72.3%60	23.7%90	32.1%48
HendricksT. HendricksLeonhardtT. LeonhardtHolcombeJ. HolcombeDavisI. DavisHousleyB. Housley	229	112	30.488	120.474	89.986	62.2%88	38.1%80	20.1%20	36.2%58	47.6%66	64.0%26	29.4%100	29.0%58
LeonhardtT. LeonhardtHolcombeJ. HolcombeDavisI. DavisHousleyB. HousleyWeatherspoon IVS. Weatherspoon IV	110	58	8.160	112.856	104.656	54.5%60	45.5%94	23.6%8	47.2%78	61.3%12	78.6%82	24.6%92	38.8%32
HendricksT. HendricksLeonhardtT. LeonhardtWellingH. WellingHolcombeJ. HolcombeTaitzN. Taitz	94	41	23.282	110.950	87.788	57.6%74	23.8%26	20.3%20	37.5%60	44.0%80	87.2%96	14.4%36	22.7%76
HendricksT. HendricksLeonhardtT. LeonhardtWellingH. WellingHolcombeJ. HolcombeHousleyB. Housley	68	34	-17.920	103.532	121.420	43.1%16	42.5%90	14.8%58	60.3%92	55.2%32	65.6%32	16.9%56	43.1%24
HendricksT. HendricksLeonhardtT. LeonhardtHolcombeJ. HolcombeHousleyB. HousleyHawkinsI. Hawkins	67	31	11.164	107.342	96.376	53.6%56	41.2%88	26.8%2	30.9%44	41.2%88	56.8%10	21.4%82	38.6%32
HendricksT. HendricksLeonhardtT. LeonhardtWellingH. WellingWeatherspoon IVS. Weatherspoon IVHawkinsI. Hawkins	53	27	19.176	121.276	102.164	57.0%72	32.1%60	15.2%54	16.0%10	52.0%46	79.3%84	17.0%56	20.0%84
HendricksT. HendricksLeonhardtT. LeonhardtWellingH. WellingTaitzN. TaitzHawkinsI. Hawkins	50	27	35.892	132.792	96.874	59.4%80	40.9%86	12.1%76	20.8%18	51.2%50	68.2%42	26.1%96	29.3%58
LeonhardtT. LeonhardtHolcombeJ. HolcombeHousleyB. HousleyWeatherspoon IVS. Weatherspoon IVHawkinsI. Hawkins	48	24	45.798	126.984	81.294	62.2%88	33.3%66	12.5%74	41.5%68	43.9%80	74.1%68	25.1%94	24.4%70
HendricksT. HendricksLeonhardtT. LeonhardtWellingH. WellingHolcombeJ. HolcombeWeatherspoon IVS. Weatherspoon IV	48	22	-37.56	94.516	132.16	37.2%6	29.0%46	12.6%72	37.2%60	65.9%4	68.4%42	15.1%42	51.2%14
LeonhardtT. LeonhardtHolcombeJ. HolcombeTaitzN. TaitzHousleyB. HousleyHawkinsI. Hawkins	45	20	26.586	121.074	94.578	64.7%92	27.8%40	20.2%20	41.2%68	55.0%32	52.6%4	38.8%100	30.0%56
HendricksT. HendricksLeonhardtT. LeonhardtWellingH. WellingHousleyB. HousleyHawkinsI. Hawkins	43	17	5.054	99.424	94.378	57.8%74	50.0%98	34.7%0	28.1%36	43.8%80	82.6%92	12.6%24	30.0%56
LeonhardtT. LeonhardtHolcombeJ. HolcombeTaitzN. TaitzDavisI. DavisHousleyB. Housley	39	18	-5.336	94.016	99.270	50.0%36	35.0%68	22.9%10	14.3%8	56.3%28	73.3%66	27.7%98	21.9%78
LeonhardtT. LeonhardtWellingH. WellingTaitzN. TaitzHousleyB. HousleyHawkinsI. Hawkins	36	17	-22.416	85.88	108.248	35.7%4	19.0%14	13.8%64	53.6%86	53.8%38	70.6%52	19.9%76	57.7%8
HendricksT. HendricksLeonhardtT. LeonhardtHolcombeJ. HolcombeTaitzN. TaitzHawkinsI. Hawkins	33	16	6.858	110.950	104.158	63.0%90	53.8%100	33.0%0	18.5%14	44.8%78	40.0%2	28.4%98	41.4%26
HendricksT. HendricksLeonhardtT. LeonhardtHolcombeJ. HolcombeWeatherspoon IVS. Weatherspoon IVHawkinsI. Hawkins	33	14	4.252	122.076	117.726	58.6%78	35.7%72	15.2%54	27.6%34	41.9%86	47.6%2	11.8%20	67.7%4
HendricksT. HendricksLeonhardtT. LeonhardtWellingH. WellingDavisI. DavisHousleyB. Housley	32	15	-2.042	116.766	118.724	58.0%76	26.7%36	15.8%50	48.0%80	44.6%78	50.0%2	17.4%60	64.3%4
HendricksT. HendricksLeonhardtT. LeonhardtHolcombeJ. HolcombeDavisI. DavisWeatherspoon IVS. Weatherspoon IV	30	13	31.090	132.190	101.266	62.5%88	45.5%94	9.9%86	32.1%48	34.0%96	60.0%14	11.7%20	48.0%16

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.