Utah Valley22-9

WACCoach: Todd Phillips

22-9NET#89

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Trevan Leonhardt	1,837	278	86.9%	+1.858	+0.554	−1.356	+0.960	−3.222	+0.442	+6.684	+1.928	−0.150	+4.398	−3.770
Jackson Holcombe	1,614	501	76.3%	+16.096	+10.494	−5.680	+2.880	+5.492	−2.888	+5.278	−1.666	−0.742	+3.796	+2.734
Tyler Hendricks	1,311	804	62.0%	+11.088	+5.680	−5.478	+3.584	+2.576	+0.148	−9.410	−5.090	−3.320	−0.934	−6.984
Braden Housley	1,152	962	54.5%	+2.560	−0.150	−2.764	+0.152	+2.776	+0.148	+4.474	+0.148	+0.658	+2.688	−1.156
Isaac Davis	1,036	1,078	49.0%	+9.886	+5.480	−4.574	+5.294	+1.264	+0.540	+2.264	+0.840	−0.644	+4.398	+0.844
Noah Taitz	920	1,195	43.5%	−0.648	−3.034	−2.464	−0.348	−4.912	+0.638	−1.146	+1.532	+4.188	−0.540	−6.280
Hayden Welling	869	1,246	41.1%	−18.76	−7.616	+11.14	−4.414	−4.814	+0.146	+2.164	+3.914	+6.796	−6.42	−1.056
Sherman Weatherspoon IV	758	1,356	35.9%	−8.222	−0.946	+7.214	−2.822	+1.162	−1.370	+0.254	+2.028	−0.150	−2.514	+9.38
Isaac Hawkins	703	1,411	33.2%	−0.250	−3.334	−3.166	−2.228	+1.062	+0.934	−8.712	−3.280	−2.626	−0.836	−7.686
Tyler Weaver	223	1,892	10.5%	−7.524	+3.470	+10.86	−0.346	−4.216	−4.094	+3.772	+2.226	−8.24	+0.358	+24.40

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Trevan Leonhardt	1,837	278	86.9%	11.064	110.750	99.768	55.1%62	34.7%68	20.3%20	38.9%64	49.4%58	68.7%44	22.3%86	37.9%34
Jackson Holcombe	1,614	501	76.3%	14.670	113.156	98.570	55.6%66	36.4%74	19.5%24	39.1%64	48.8%60	68.5%42	22.6%86	39.0%32
Tyler Hendricks	1,311	804	62.0%	14.970	112.856	97.972	56.2%68	36.1%74	20.2%20	34.5%54	47.4%68	67.5%38	21.4%82	35.8%40
Braden Housley	1,152	962	54.5%	11.966	110.650	98.770	55.0%62	36.3%74	20.2%20	39.9%66	49.2%58	69.0%44	22.9%88	37.8%34
Isaac Davis	1,036	1,078	49.0%	15.872	113.456	97.672	57.6%74	35.8%72	20.5%18	39.1%64	49.6%58	68.3%42	24.0%90	38.8%32
Noah Taitz	920	1,195	43.5%	10.464	108.946	98.570	54.8%62	32.3%60	20.5%18	37.3%60	50.1%52	71.0%54	21.4%82	34.8%42
Hayden Welling	869	1,246	41.1%	-0.246	106.138	106.352	52.3%50	32.4%60	20.3%20	39.2%64	51.4%48	72.6%62	18.0%64	37.8%34
Sherman Weatherspoon IV	758	1,356	35.9%	5.554	110.048	104.556	53.2%54	35.8%72	19.4%24	38.1%62	50.5%52	68.6%44	20.1%76	44.3%22
Isaac Hawkins	703	1,411	33.2%	10.664	108.444	97.872	53.5%56	35.8%72	20.8%16	32.2%48	47.1%68	67.0%38	21.2%82	33.4%44
Tyler Weaver	223	1,892	10.5%	4.052	113.658	109.644	54.7%60	31.4%56	16.6%42	41.2%68	51.2%50	61.3%18	22.0%84	60.4%6

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Trevan Leonhardt	1,837	278	86.9%	9.262	110.248	101.066	54.2%58	37.9%80	19.8%22	32.2%48	47.5%66	68.8%44	18.0%64	41.5%26
Jackson Holcombe	1,614	501	76.3%	-1.442	102.732	104.158	52.8%52	31.0%54	22.4%10	33.9%52	50.3%52	69.2%46	18.9%70	36.3%38
Tyler Hendricks	1,311	804	62.0%	3.952	107.140	103.360	52.8%52	33.6%66	20.2%20	43.9%74	52.4%44	70.8%52	22.3%86	42.7%24
Braden Housley	1,152	962	54.5%	9.362	110.750	101.466	54.9%62	33.6%66	20.2%20	35.5%56	49.2%58	68.3%42	20.3%78	38.9%32
Isaac Davis	1,036	1,078	49.0%	5.956	108.042	102.064	52.4%50	34.6%68	19.9%20	36.9%60	48.8%60	69.0%44	19.6%74	38.0%34
Noah Taitz	920	1,195	43.5%	11.064	111.952	100.966	55.1%62	37.2%76	19.9%20	38.4%62	48.5%62	66.9%38	21.9%84	41.0%28
Hayden Welling	869	1,246	41.1%	18.576	113.858	95.278	56.7%70	37.2%76	20.2%20	37.1%60	47.5%66	65.9%32	24.4%92	38.8%32
Sherman Weatherspoon IV	758	1,356	35.9%	13.768	111.050	97.374	56.0%66	34.7%68	20.6%18	37.9%62	48.4%62	68.7%44	22.6%86	35.0%42
Isaac Hawkins	703	1,411	33.2%	10.864	111.752	101.066	55.7%66	34.8%68	19.9%22	40.9%68	50.3%52	69.6%48	22.0%84	41.1%28
Tyler Weaver	223	1,892	10.5%	11.566	110.350	98.870	55.0%62	35.6%72	20.6%18	37.6%60	49.0%60	69.5%48	21.7%84	35.9%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.