UTSA10-19

AmericanCoach: Austin Claunch

10-19NET#193

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Primo Spears	1,804	201	90.0%	+1.054	+0.554	−0.452	+6.096	−7.34	+2.714	−0.848	−3.784	+0.758	−3.96	+7.712
Marcus Millender	1,774	230	88.5%	+11.788	+3.268	−8.588	+3.584	+0.354	+0.836	−3.432	−5.092	−4.016	+3.996	+20.60
Raekwon Horton	1,430	574	71.3%	−14.410	−7.218	+7.214	−4.314	−3.918	+0.148	+0.656	+3.318	+1.162	−1.034	+0.348
Damari Monsanto	1,311	693	65.4%	−1.944	+2.062	+3.928	+4.490	−1.836	+0.738	−7.514	+1.632	−4.216	+0.152	−1.356
Jonnivius Smith	1,158	846	57.8%	+12.990	+7.386	−5.578	+4.390	+4.688	+2.616	+4.678	−1.364	+5.494	+0.152	+4.028
Tai'Reon Joseph	785	1,219	39.2%	−3.836	−4.130	−0.250	−2.624	−8.62	−5.296	−2.140	+3.814	+0.658	+2.184	−5.176
Baboucarr Njie	538	1,466	26.9%	+14.994	+9.592	−5.578	+3.080	+7.998	+0.344	+6.886	−6.696	−3.022	−0.838	+3.132
David Hermes	481	1,523	24.0%	+0.152	+4.072	+3.928	+3.282	−5.510	−3.492	−5.920	+2.622	−0.942	−0.936	−9.792
Mo Njie	224	1,780	11.2%	−14.810	−11.98	+2.932	−7.84	+4.588	+3.110	+2.466	−1.162	−1.734	−1.132	−4.976
Nazar Mahmoud	187	1,817	9.3%	−13.112	−3.732	+9.48	−3.518	+8.398	+3.76	−5.322	+4.98	+5.292	−2.416	+1.144
Skylar Wicks	144	1,860	7.2%	−9.620	−3.234	+6.318	−5.210	+4.688	+1.526	+12.798	+6.54	+2.778	−0.542	−13.596
Jaquan Scott	140	1,864	7.0%	−9.420	−19.02	−9.690	−14.62	+5.090	−0.252	+0.958	−6.596	−0.942	+1.778	+8.510

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Primo Spears	1,804	201	90.0%	-5.138	107.746	112.934	50.3%46	28.2%40	16.2%52	29.0%46	52.9%38	61.7%22	20.7%74	44.7%16
Marcus Millender	1,774	230	88.5%	-3.940	108.046	111.936	50.1%46	29.2%44	16.0%54	28.7%46	52.7%40	61.2%20	21.5%78	46.4%14
Raekwon Horton	1,430	574	71.3%	-9.432	105.640	115.030	48.4%34	28.0%38	15.9%56	29.2%48	54.2%32	61.9%22	20.8%74	44.0%18
Damari Monsanto	1,311	693	65.4%	-5.936	108.448	114.332	51.2%48	28.5%40	16.2%54	26.5%40	53.8%34	60.1%18	21.1%76	43.5%18
Jonnivius Smith	1,158	846	57.8%	0.246	110.854	110.640	51.5%50	31.1%52	17.0%46	31.0%52	52.7%40	64.0%30	21.1%76	45.6%16
Tai'Reon Joseph	785	1,219	39.2%	-7.634	105.240	112.834	48.1%34	24.0%24	12.7%78	27.8%44	55.6%26	62.0%24	22.4%82	40.8%22
Baboucarr Njie	538	1,466	26.9%	5.656	114.662	109.044	51.9%52	34.9%66	16.2%54	34.0%60	48.6%60	59.5%16	20.5%72	46.1%14
David Hermes	481	1,523	24.0%	-5.138	110.754	115.928	52.1%54	24.9%26	13.3%74	24.6%34	55.3%28	60.9%20	20.4%72	36.7%30
Mo Njie	224	1,780	11.2%	-18.320	97.122	115.528	42.7%16	33.1%58	18.7%34	31.2%54	52.3%42	60.2%18	20.1%70	39.6%24
Nazar Mahmoud	187	1,817	9.3%	-17.122	104.338	121.418	46.5%28	36.5%72	19.3%30	24.3%32	57.7%20	66.3%38	19.0%64	44.9%16
Skylar Wicks	144	1,860	7.2%	-14.124	104.738	118.822	44.8%22	33.3%62	17.3%44	40.8%76	59.3%14	64.2%30	20.6%74	31.4%44
Jaquan Scott	140	1,864	7.0%	-14.026	90.012	104.058	36.2%6	33.7%62	15.7%56	29.9%50	47.2%66	60.8%20	22.7%84	51.9%10

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Primo Spears	1,804	201	90.0%	-6.136	107.244	113.334	44.4%20	35.5%68	13.5%72	29.7%50	56.6%24	61.0%20	24.6%90	37.0%30
Marcus Millender	1,774	230	88.5%	-15.622	104.840	120.420	46.6%28	28.9%42	15.2%60	32.0%56	57.7%20	65.2%34	17.6%54	25.9%60
Raekwon Horton	1,430	574	71.3%	5.056	112.858	107.848	52.7%56	31.9%54	15.8%56	28.6%46	51.0%48	60.8%20	21.8%80	43.7%18
Damari Monsanto	1,311	693	65.4%	-4.040	106.442	110.440	46.8%28	30.3%48	15.4%58	33.9%60	52.3%42	64.3%30	21.1%76	44.7%16
Jonnivius Smith	1,158	846	57.8%	-12.726	103.436	116.128	47.2%30	26.6%32	14.4%66	26.4%38	54.0%34	58.5%14	21.1%76	41.6%20
Tai'Reon Joseph	785	1,219	39.2%	-3.740	109.350	113.034	50.7%46	32.5%56	18.0%40	29.9%50	51.8%44	61.4%20	20.3%72	45.9%16
Baboucarr Njie	538	1,466	26.9%	-9.332	105.140	114.432	48.8%38	27.0%34	15.8%56	27.2%42	55.2%28	62.5%24	21.3%78	43.0%18
David Hermes	481	1,523	24.0%	-5.338	106.744	112.036	48.9%38	30.4%48	16.7%48	30.5%52	52.6%40	61.8%22	21.3%78	46.3%14
Mo Njie	224	1,780	11.2%	-3.640	109.050	112.636	50.5%46	28.6%40	15.6%58	28.8%46	53.4%36	61.8%22	21.2%76	44.5%16
Nazar Mahmoud	187	1,817	9.3%	-4.040	108.046	112.036	50.0%40	28.3%40	15.6%58	29.6%48	52.8%40	61.1%20	21.3%78	43.8%18
Skylar Wicks	144	1,860	7.2%	-4.640	107.946	112.536	50.0%46	28.8%42	15.8%56	28.1%44	52.8%40	61.4%22	21.1%76	44.9%16
Jaquan Scott	140	1,864	7.0%	-4.640	109.050	113.634	50.8%46	28.7%42	15.9%56	29.0%46	53.7%34	61.7%22	21.0%76	43.3%18

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.