Wyoming13-17

MWCCoach: Jeff Linder

13-17NET#172

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Brendan Wenzel	1,639	190	89.6%	−4.634	+1.760	+6.318	+2.476	−5.710	−2.482	+4.576	+4.810	+10.4100	−5.72	−0.550
Sam Griffin	1,588	241	86.8%	−16.38	+2.866	+19.10	−2.922	−0.350	−4.594	−7.814	+9.60	+7.798	−6.22	+13.14
Akuel Kot	1,554	275	85.0%	+5.772	+1.558	−4.270	+5.694	−5.910	−1.774	−10.28	+4.212	+10.1100	+1.876	−5.276
Mason Walters	1,107	723	60.5%	−3.338	+2.162	+5.422	+0.658	−7.76	−6.998	−10.96	+3.318	+6.294	−4.56	−2.966
Cam Manyawu	983	847	53.7%	+6.574	+1.960	−4.774	+1.768	+10.6100	+6.02	+3.974	−0.252	+0.656	+4.096	+7.114
Caden Powell	917	912	50.1%	−5.032	−2.936	+2.138	−1.140	−1.340	+0.342	−6.518	+1.434	−1.934	−1.332	−7.484
Kobe Newton	545	1,284	29.8%	+0.552	−3.632	−4.170	−3.816	+3.178	+2.912	+8.890	−3.784	−8.44	+5.098	+5.820
Kael Combs	358	1,471	19.6%	+11.086	+4.874	−6.280	+3.986	−1.538	+0.540	+11.094	−6.194	−7.64	+2.282	−3.166
Oleg Kojenets	345	1,484	18.9%	−3.438	−8.116	−4.774	−2.724	+2.068	+4.26	+1.460	−6.494	−3.520	−1.922	−4.572

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Brendan Wenzel	1,639	190	89.6%	-4.538	108.448	112.934	50.9%48	32.2%56	18.7%34	37.7%70	52.9%38	69.2%50	15.4%40	27.3%54
Sam Griffin	1,588	241	86.8%	-6.136	108.650	114.730	50.3%46	32.8%58	18.3%38	36.2%66	53.7%34	69.2%50	15.2%38	29.2%48
Akuel Kot	1,554	275	85.0%	-3.240	108.548	111.636	51.5%52	31.9%56	18.7%34	35.7%66	53.1%36	69.9%54	16.3%46	26.5%56
Mason Walters	1,107	723	60.5%	-5.438	109.150	114.530	50.9%48	29.8%46	16.2%52	33.1%58	53.7%34	70.6%56	14.2%32	26.2%58
Cam Manyawu	983	847	53.7%	-1.044	109.150	110.140	51.5%52	37.8%78	21.7%18	39.0%72	52.3%40	68.3%48	17.9%56	30.8%44
Caden Powell	917	912	50.1%	-6.536	106.844	113.334	50.1%46	32.2%56	19.1%32	34.0%60	53.1%36	67.1%42	15.4%40	23.8%66
Kobe Newton	545	1,284	29.8%	-3.740	105.742	109.442	48.0%36	35.0%68	20.9%22	43.5%80	49.8%54	62.2%24	19.6%68	31.4%42
Kael Combs	358	1,471	19.6%	4.856	112.158	107.348	53.8%64	31.6%54	19.3%30	46.2%84	47.5%64	62.0%24	17.8%56	24.9%62
Oleg Kojenets	345	1,484	18.9%	-6.836	101.632	108.546	48.4%38	34.4%64	22.3%16	38.3%70	47.3%64	65.4%34	14.5%32	23.8%66

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Brendan Wenzel	1,639	190	89.6%	0.146	106.844	106.750	48.5%38	37.8%78	21.0%20	33.1%58	48.1%60	58.8%14	21.1%76	27.8%52
Sam Griffin	1,588	241	86.8%	10.264	105.842	95.676	53.2%60	33.1%58	22.8%14	44.1%80	44.1%76	61.5%22	21.4%78	16.1%86
Akuel Kot	1,554	275	85.0%	-8.932	107.046	115.828	45.9%28	37.7%78	20.4%24	45.9%84	48.9%56	59.8%16	14.5%32	31.8%40
Mason Walters	1,107	723	60.5%	-2.042	107.046	109.044	50.3%46	37.5%76	23.1%12	44.0%80	50.4%48	64.3%32	18.7%62	29.1%48
Cam Manyawu	983	847	53.7%	-7.534	107.246	114.830	49.7%42	27.3%36	15.7%56	35.1%64	52.5%40	67.8%44	13.9%30	23.7%66
Caden Powell	917	912	50.1%	-1.544	109.752	111.238	51.2%50	33.5%62	18.7%34	40.5%74	51.7%44	69.0%50	16.7%48	31.2%42
Kobe Newton	545	1,284	29.8%	-4.240	109.350	113.532	51.7%54	31.9%56	18.1%38	34.6%62	53.5%34	70.6%58	14.5%32	25.7%60
Kael Combs	358	1,471	19.6%	-6.236	107.346	113.532	49.9%42	33.1%58	18.8%34	35.1%64	53.6%34	69.7%54	15.6%40	28.0%52
Oleg Kojenets	345	1,484	18.9%	-3.440	109.852	113.234	51.2%50	32.4%58	18.1%38	36.9%68	53.7%34	68.8%50	16.4%46	28.3%50

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.