Alabama St.9-22

SWACCoach: Chris Wright

9-22NET#325

Poss2,165

Net Rtg-7.434

ORtg100.426

DRtg107.848

Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,165	988	-7.434	100.426	107.848	47.0%26	31.8%58	18.2%32	34.8%54	51.9%46	68.7%44	18.9%70	42.6%24
PalesseC. PalesseAndersonA. AndersonSimpsonM. SimpsonStanbackJ. StanbackKingR. King	259	128	-13.026	96.720	109.744	48.4%32	28.9%46	20.0%20	27.8%36	51.8%46	62.5%20	20.0%76	32.0%50
PalesseC. PalesseWalkerJ. WalkerSimpsonM. SimpsonStanbackJ. StanbackByrdT. Byrd	147	75	-5.636	90.912	96.576	44.3%18	33.8%66	21.7%14	18.3%12	47.4%66	74.6%68	19.4%74	33.0%46
PalesseC. PalesseSimpsonM. SimpsonStanbackJ. StanbackByrdT. ByrdMasonT. Mason	59	25	-16.022	87.910	103.958	42.3%14	26.5%36	15.2%54	28.8%38	45.5%74	75.8%74	12.8%26	56.8%8
PalesseC. PalesseAndrewsM. AndrewsSimpsonM. SimpsonStanbackJ. StanbackByrdT. Byrd	54	27	11.566	120.072	108.548	58.3%76	40.0%84	18.5%30	27.1%34	57.0%24	73.1%64	22.0%84	48.8%14
PalesseC. PalesseAndersonA. AndersonSimpsonM. SimpsonStanbackJ. StanbackMasonT. Mason	52	27	-15.722	108.344	124.116	52.1%50	46.7%96	23.2%8	25.0%26	59.6%16	60.7%16	15.9%48	48.1%16
PalesseC. PalesseAndersonA. AndersonWalkerJ. WalkerSimpsonM. SimpsonStanbackJ. Stanback	44	21	39.394	132.992	93.580	60.5%84	23.5%24	6.9%94	36.8%58	40.9%88	65.0%28	24.0%90	36.4%38
AndersonA. AndersonSimpsonM. SimpsonStanbackJ. StanbackByrdT. ByrdMasonT. Mason	42	19	3.852	118.168	114.434	52.4%50	34.8%68	11.8%78	16.7%10	63.3%8	62.5%20	27.3%96	36.7%38
AndersonA. AndersonSimpsonM. SimpsonStanbackJ. StanbackByrdT. ByrdKingR. King	41	18	-5.536	103.634	109.146	38.9%8	40.0%84	14.5%60	55.6%88	45.8%72	60.9%16	18.6%68	47.2%18
PalesseC. PalesseYatesD. YatesSimpsonM. SimpsonByrdT. ByrdMasonT. Mason	39	20	19.276	125.682	106.452	59.7%80	26.3%34	10.3%86	61.3%92	45.0%76	70.0%48	15.6%46	60.0%6
AndersonA. AndersonYatesD. YatesSimpsonM. SimpsonStanbackJ. StanbackByrdT. Byrd	37	15	22.180	124.180	102.064	51.6%46	45.5%94	18.9%28	53.1%86	53.7%38	73.3%66	24.8%92	33.3%44
PalesseC. PalesseAndersonA. AndersonYatesD. YatesSimpsonM. SimpsonKingR. King	36	17	24.082	145.998	121.918	69.1%96	21.4%20	5.5%96	20.6%18	66.1%4	61.5%18	26.5%96	35.7%40
PalesseC. PalesseYatesD. YatesSimpsonM. SimpsonStanbackJ. StanbackByrdT. Byrd	36	19	11.164	95.518	84.590	48.0%30	35.3%70	25.3%4	64.0%94	34.4%96	70.8%54	16.3%52	37.5%36
AndersonA. AndersonYatesD. YatesAndrewsM. AndrewsSimpsonM. SimpsonByrdT. Byrd	35	18	-39.46	82.06	121.420	42.2%12	30.4%52	22.6%10	15.6%8	51.5%48	55.6%8	12.6%26	52.9%12
AndersonA. AndersonYatesD. YatesSimpsonM. SimpsonByrdT. ByrdMasonT. Mason	35	15	-8.832	105.236	114.034	48.3%32	38.9%82	19.9%22	44.8%74	50.0%58	65.2%30	15.0%42	21.2%80
PalesseC. PalesseAndersonA. AndersonYatesD. YatesSimpsonM. SimpsonMasonT. Mason	34	14	20.078	108.344	88.388	50.0%36	25.0%28	11.7%78	44.8%74	35.0%96	58.3%12	18.9%70	40.0%30
AndersonA. AndersonYatesD. YatesSimpsonM. SimpsonByrdT. ByrdKingR. King	34	15	3.252	105.336	102.264	40.0%8	40.0%84	17.6%36	43.3%72	48.1%64	68.8%44	21.0%80	33.3%44
PalesseC. PalesseYatesD. YatesAndrewsM. AndrewsSimpsonM. SimpsonByrdT. Byrd	34	16	5.956	130.790	124.814	53.3%54	26.3%34	5.9%96	46.7%78	52.9%40	57.9%12	13.3%28	41.2%28
PalesseC. PalesseAndersonA. AndersonAndrewsM. AndrewsSimpsonM. SimpsonStanbackJ. Stanback	33	15	-45.04	88.310	133.36	50.0%36	25.0%28	27.4%2	24.0%24	60.7%14	66.7%32	9.8%12	35.7%40
PalesseC. PalesseYatesD. YatesAndrewsM. AndrewsSimpsonM. SimpsonMackT. Mack	32	15	35.092	117.566	82.692	57.4%74	40.0%84	24.7%6	25.9%30	38.0%92	73.7%66	21.4%82	48.0%16
WalkerJ. WalkerSimpsonM. SimpsonMackT. MackStanbackJ. StanbackByrdT. Byrd	31	13	-0.146	113.356	113.436	51.6%46	33.3%66	12.9%70	12.9%6	56.0%28	81.8%90	12.6%24	40.0%30

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.