Alabama St.9-22

SWACCoach: Chris Wright

9-22NET#325

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Micah Simpson	1,783	382	82.4%	+8.080	+14.198	+6.216	+6.396	+0.960	−4.294	−5.922	+0.544	−4.912	−0.640	−1.962
Cameron Palesse	1,505	659	69.5%	−7.624	−0.548	+7.114	+1.566	−2.826	−0.456	+0.354	+2.028	−4.612	−1.230	−0.150
Jerquarius Stanback	1,353	812	62.5%	+12.490	+5.780	−6.884	+3.484	+6.494	+2.018	+0.152	−4.286	+1.566	+1.982	+3.430
Asjon Anderson	1,287	878	59.4%	−9.220	−2.836	+6.316	−1.436	+0.658	+1.822	−2.636	+2.522	−5.510	+0.356	−1.660
Tyler Byrd	1,268	896	58.6%	+6.574	+3.370	−3.166	−0.940	+3.380	−0.964	+5.882	−1.060	+1.666	+0.762	+1.142
Damarien Yates	907	1,257	41.9%	−5.430	−2.836	+2.634	−3.220	−1.736	−1.166	+5.480	+2.424	+0.252	−0.248	+1.540
R'Chaun King	610	1,555	28.2%	−0.450	+1.158	+1.540	+2.778	−5.012	−0.354	−0.250	−0.858	−5.68	−0.346	−11.594
Tyler Mack	580	1,584	26.8%	+11.188	−4.826	−15.998	−2.228	+0.052	+1.426	+0.354	−5.392	+12.1100	+0.152	+5.420
Mario Andrews	464	1,700	21.5%	+4.066	+0.252	−3.870	−0.842	+3.784	+1.722	−6.618	−1.566	+1.566	+1.170	+8.112
JaSteven Walker	457	1,708	21.1%	−3.238	−6.618	−3.468	−1.732	−2.032	+1.820	−9.310	−0.252	+8.4100	−0.540	+4.026
Tyler Mason	426	1,738	19.7%	−1.046	+2.062	+3.132	+0.962	−2.230	−3.794	−1.046	+1.830	−1.932	−0.934	−3.972

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Micah Simpson	1,783	382	82.4%	-6.036	102.932	108.946	48.0%30	31.9%58	17.5%36	33.8%52	52.0%46	67.9%40	18.8%70	42.3%26
Cameron Palesse	1,505	659	69.5%	-9.730	100.226	109.944	47.4%28	30.9%54	18.1%32	34.9%54	52.5%42	67.4%38	18.6%68	42.6%24
Jerquarius Stanback	1,353	812	62.5%	-2.740	102.530	105.254	48.3%32	34.3%66	19.0%26	34.8%54	50.3%52	69.3%46	19.6%74	43.9%22
Asjon Anderson	1,287	878	59.4%	-11.128	99.224	110.442	46.4%24	32.0%58	19.0%26	33.8%52	52.9%40	66.4%32	19.1%70	41.9%26
Tyler Byrd	1,268	896	58.6%	-4.738	101.830	106.552	46.6%26	33.1%62	17.9%34	37.2%60	51.5%48	69.4%46	19.2%72	43.0%24
Damarien Yates	907	1,257	41.9%	-10.528	98.824	109.344	45.1%20	30.8%54	17.6%34	38.0%62	53.3%40	68.8%44	18.8%70	43.5%22
R'Chaun King	610	1,555	28.2%	-7.732	101.228	108.946	48.9%34	28.1%42	18.0%32	34.7%54	51.3%48	64.8%28	18.7%68	34.5%42
Tyler Mack	580	1,584	26.8%	0.846	96.920	96.176	45.4%22	31.8%58	19.3%24	35.0%54	47.9%64	77.7%80	19.0%70	46.6%18
Mario Andrews	464	1,700	21.5%	-4.338	100.526	104.856	46.3%24	34.6%68	19.6%22	29.7%40	50.7%52	69.9%48	19.8%74	49.0%14
JaSteven Walker	457	1,708	21.1%	-9.930	95.218	105.156	45.6%22	30.2%52	19.7%22	27.5%34	51.7%46	75.5%72	18.5%68	45.8%18
Tyler Mason	426	1,738	19.7%	-8.232	102.030	110.342	47.7%30	30.0%50	15.2%54	34.0%52	53.4%40	67.3%38	18.2%64	39.5%30

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Micah Simpson	1,783	382	82.4%	-13.924	88.810	102.762	41.7%12	31.0%54	21.7%14	39.7%66	51.5%48	72.8%62	19.4%74	44.2%22
Cameron Palesse	1,505	659	69.5%	-2.142	100.728	102.862	45.9%24	33.7%66	18.5%30	34.6%54	50.5%52	71.9%58	19.8%74	42.7%24
Jerquarius Stanback	1,353	812	62.5%	-15.222	96.920	112.038	44.8%20	27.9%42	17.0%40	34.8%54	54.5%34	67.8%40	17.7%62	40.5%28
Asjon Anderson	1,287	878	59.4%	-2.042	102.130	104.158	47.8%30	31.4%56	17.2%38	36.4%58	50.4%52	71.9%58	18.7%68	43.6%22
Tyler Byrd	1,268	896	58.6%	-11.228	98.422	109.644	47.5%28	29.8%50	18.7%28	31.4%46	52.5%44	67.8%40	18.5%68	42.0%26
Damarien Yates	907	1,257	41.9%	-5.136	101.628	106.752	48.3%32	32.5%60	18.7%28	32.6%48	50.9%50	68.7%44	19.0%70	42.0%26
R'Chaun King	610	1,555	28.2%	-7.334	100.126	107.350	46.2%24	33.1%62	18.3%30	34.9%54	52.2%44	70.4%50	19.0%70	46.1%18
Tyler Mack	580	1,584	26.8%	-10.328	101.730	112.038	47.6%28	31.8%58	17.9%34	34.7%54	53.3%40	65.5%32	18.9%70	41.3%26
Mario Andrews	464	1,700	21.5%	-8.232	100.326	108.646	47.2%28	30.9%54	17.9%34	36.3%58	52.2%44	68.4%42	18.7%68	41.0%28
JaSteven Walker	457	1,708	21.1%	-6.734	101.830	108.548	47.3%28	32.2%60	17.9%34	36.8%58	52.0%46	67.1%38	19.0%70	41.8%26
Tyler Mason	426	1,738	19.7%	-7.234	100.026	107.250	46.8%26	32.2%60	19.0%26	35.0%54	51.6%48	69.1%46	19.1%72	43.4%22

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.