Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
American
Cincinnati logo

Cincy

20-10NET#49Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #55Coach: John Brannen
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
LOhio St. logoWDrake logoWAlabama A&M logoWIllinois St. logoLBowling Green logoWValparaiso logoWUNLV logoWVermont logoLXavier logoLColgate logoWTennessee logoLIowa logoWConnecticut logoLTulane logoWTulsa logoWUCF logoLMemphis logoWEast Carolina logoWTemple logoWSMU logoWHouston logoWWichita St. logoLConnecticut logoWMemphis logoWEast Carolina logoLUCF logoWWichita St. logoLHouston logoWSouth Florida logoWTemple logo

Team Stats

30 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating8.175
  • Offensive Rating105.231
  • Defensive Rating97.186
  • Pace69.184
  • Effective FG%50.3%55
  • Off Rebound Pct32.0%85
  • Turnover Pct20.8%37
  • FT Attempt Rate39.6%93

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct66.7%81
  • Point Margin / Game5.677
  • Points / Game72.764
  • Points Allowed / Game67.167
  • 1st Half Margin2.265
  • 2nd Half Margin3.482
  • Avg Largest Lead12.662
  • Avg Largest Deficit7.976

Box Score

  • Points / Game72.764
  • Rebounds / Game37.780
  • Assists / Game14.684
  • ORebs / Game11.075
  • DRebs / Game26.774
  • Steals / Game6.555
  • Blocks / Game4.994
  • Turnovers / Game14.417
  • PFs / Game18.039

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game25.453
  • FGAs / Game57.142
  • Field Goal Pct44.5%62
  • 2PMs / Game18.967
  • 2PAs / Game36.554
  • 2-Point Pct51.7%71
  • 3PMs / Game6.632
  • 3PAs / Game20.637
  • 3-Point Pct31.9%26
  • FTMs / Game15.384
  • FTAs / Game22.692
  • Free Throw Pct67.7%21

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s51.9%60
  • % Pts from 3s27.1%24
  • % Pts from FTs21.0%83
  • Paint Pts / Game20.352
  • % Pts in Paint27.9%45
  • Fast Break Pts / Game7.269
  • % Pts on Fast Break9.9%68
  • Points off TOVs / Game11.132
  • % Pts off TOVs15.3%29
  • 1st Half Pts / Game32.435
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game37.555

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %54.2%58
  • Points / Shot1.2771
  • 3-Point Att Rate36.1%38
  • Assist Pct57.3%88
  • Assists / 100 Poss21.163
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.01x54
  • PF Drawn / Game19.183

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%45.7%93
  • Opp True Shooting %49.9%91
  • Opp Field Goal Pct39.8%93
  • Opp 2-Point Pct43.1%98
  • Opp 3-Point Pct33.7%41
  • Opp 3PA Rate34.7%75
  • Opp FT Att Rate29.2%73
  • Opp Points / Shot1.1390

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game67.167
  • Paint Pts Allowed14.980
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed5.163
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed10.867
  • Opp Assist Pct50.7%55
  • TOVs Forced / Game14.074

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct71.2%39
  • Turnovers Forced Pct20.3%54
  • Steal Pct9.5%43
  • Block Pct7.0%90
  • Hakeem Pct16.5%74
  • PF Efficiency0.94x79
  • Steals / PF0.36x47
  • Blocks / PF0.27x90

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 291 D-I teams
  • #24Paint Pts %46.7%
  • #27FTAR39.6%
  • #29Opp eFG%45.7%
  • #43FB Pts %16.5%
  • #44AST%57.3%
  • #53Adj ORtg109.0
  • #59OREB%32.0%
  • #64Adj DRtg96.6
Where they rank worstof 291 D-I teams
  • #291TOV%20.8%
  • #2603P%31.9%
  • #228Opp OREB%28.8%
  • #219Opp 3P%33.7%
  • #2163PM Diff-12
  • #159eFG%50.3%
  • #155TS%53.6%
  • #109Opp TOV%20.3%
Game Log
Loading game log…
T. ScottSr6'8"+1.79454.3%5419.5%6111.410.52.228.8%61.3%
J. CumberlandSr6'5"+1.38654.2%5429.0%9615.53.84.931.3%75.3%
K. WilliamsJr6'5"+1.28453.0%4822.8%8012.64.61.634.2%79.2%
C. VogtSo7'1"+1.28364.8%8918.2%5211.05.90.80.0%57.4%
M. Adams-WoodsFr6'3"+0.65957.4%7012.9%175.02.21.637.3%76.9%
J. CumberlandSr6'3"+0.45152.4%4519.7%628.81.41.335.2%68.8%
C. McNealSr6'1"-0.12535.1%815.6%332.61.61.415.7%42.5%
J. KozSr6'1"0.0%10.00.30.00.0%0.0%
J. SorollaSr7'0"59.9%7815.1%293.32.40.60.0%61.5%
S. MartinJr5'10"0.0%10.00.00.00.0%0.0%
T. MooreJr6'5"37.5%918.2%521.01.50.528.6%0.0%
M. DiarraSo6'9"61.8%8316.3%383.02.80.371.4%62.1%
R. BanksFr6'5"0.0%10.00.00.00.0%0.0%
J. DavenportFr6'7"46.7%2120.0%651.91.00.114.3%76.5%
Z. HarveyFr6'5"47.5%2314.9%281.80.70.731.3%54.2%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Cincinnati logo25-2618-15#4814.787111.06196.39710.086+7667+588330.6%45-286650.5%3233.9%4868.1%12
Cincinnati logo24-2519-16#4714.887112.37597.5949.285+4256+357032.2%69-969051.1%4632.4%2566.5%9
Cincinnati logo23-2422-15#2816.393113.28297.0959.391+26896+296536.3%9604550.3%3833.0%3468.8%17
Cincinnati logo22-2323-13#5112.786113.190100.4814.777+9272+1059730.9%67-547651.7%6135.1%6570.6%38
Cincinnati logo21-2218-15#1026.472104.35097.9853.773-1141+879530.0%65-658247.0%1231.5%2066.9%10
Cincinnati logo19-2020-10#4912.386109.08696.6826.481+10779-123832.0%83+113850.3%5431.9%2667.7%20
Cincinnati logo18-19728-7#2217.794115.39497.7885.981+17691-521737.4%99-1119449.0%2234.5%5170.4%49
Cincinnati logo17-18231-5#626.199114.68888.51003.977+24897+316838.0%100-1129451.0%4835.4%5569.8%30
Cincinnati logo16-17630-6#1722.595115.59293.0976.080+16387+135835.5%93-1159552.0%6634.5%4268.6%34
Cincinnati logo15-16922-11#2717.993111.98694.0965.678+15487+125936.7%94-879149.3%3734.8%5370.5%59
Cincinnati logo14-15823-11#4113.289106.77493.4944.978+15388-253037.3%95+233349.5%5432.9%3267.0%28
Cincinnati logo13-14527-7#2518.493110.67792.2985.778+14688+145939.1%97-1089547.7%2433.5%3870.8%57

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
53.6%#154
Effective FG %
50.3%#158
3-Point %
31.9%#259
3PAR
36.1%#219
FTAR
39.6%#27
Assist %
57.3%#44

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
41.9%#38
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
21.1%#60
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

22 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 45.3% of shots at 0.85 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0945.3%0.85Middle (11–20s): 32.5% of shots at 1.16 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0432.5%1.16Late (21s+): 22.2% of shots at 1.23 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9722.2%1.23SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 43.5% of shots at 0.81 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0743.5%0.81Middle (11–20s): 28.2% of shots at 1.09 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0228.2%1.09Late (21s+): 28.2% of shots at 0.92 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9528.2%0.92SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

22 games
Created byFinished by
Jarron Cumberland → Chris Vogt: 19 assisted baskets (18 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Jarron Cumberland → Keith Williams: 17 assisted baskets (12 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 4 from three)Jarron Cumberland → Jaevin Cumberland: 13 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 12 from three)Jarron Cumberland → Mika Adams-Woods: 5 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Jarron Cumberland → Mamoudou Diarra: 5 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 1 from three)Mika Adams-Woods → Chris Vogt: 6 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)Mika Adams-Woods → Jaevin Cumberland: 5 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Mika Adams-Woods → Jarron Cumberland: 8 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)Chris McNeal → Keith Williams: 6 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)Chris McNeal → Jaevin Cumberland: 7 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 7 from three)Keith Williams → Chris Vogt: 11 assisted baskets (10 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Jaevin Cumberland → Chris Vogt: 5 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)Jaevin Cumberland → Keith Williams: 5 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 1 from three)Chris Vogt → Keith Williams: 4 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 1 from three)Jar. Cumberland59 astAdams-Woods19 astMcNeal13 astWilliams11 astJae. Cumberland10 astVogtVogt41 madeWilliams32 madeJae. Cumberland25 madeJar. Cumberland8 madeAdams-WoodsDiarra
Jar. Cumberland is the least-assisted finisher — 89% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 19-20. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 19-20. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.