Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
American
Cincinnati logo

Cincy

28-7NET#22Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #55Coach: Mick Cronin
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
LOhio St. logoWNorth Carolina Central logoWMilwaukee logoWWestern Michigan logoWGeorge Mason logoWMississippi logoWArkansas Pine Bluff logoWUNLV logoWNorthern Kentucky logoWXavier logoLMississippi St. logoWUCLA logoWSouth Carolina St. logoWTulane logoLEast Carolina logoWTulsa logoWConnecticut logoWSouth Florida logoWWichita St. logoWTulsa logoWTemple logoWSMU logoWMemphis logoLHouston logoWWichita St. logoWUCF logoWConnecticut logoWSMU logoWMemphis logoLUCF logoLHouston logoWSMU logoWWichita St. logoWHouston logoR1LIowa logo

Team Stats

35 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating15.792
  • Offensive Rating124.485
  • Defensive Rating108.856
  • Pace57.613
  • Effective FG%49.0%23
  • Off Rebound Pct37.4%99
  • Turnover Pct18.1%77
  • FT Attempt Rate37.6%85

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct80.0%94
  • Point Margin / Game9.091
  • Points / Game71.744
  • Points Allowed / Game62.796
  • 1st Half Margin5.291
  • 2nd Half Margin3.886
  • Avg Largest Lead14.784
  • Avg Largest Deficit6.094

Box Score

  • Points / Game71.744
  • Rebounds / Game36.161
  • Assists / Game13.348
  • ORebs / Game12.894
  • DRebs / Game23.313
  • Steals / Game6.146
  • Blocks / Game4.487
  • Turnovers / Game10.496
  • PFs / Game16.284

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game24.935
  • FGAs / Game57.746
  • Field Goal Pct43.2%32
  • 2PMs / Game18.360
  • 2PAs / Game38.480
  • 2-Point Pct47.6%20
  • 3PMs / Game6.619
  • 3PAs / Game19.214
  • 3-Point Pct34.5%52
  • FTMs / Game15.382
  • FTAs / Game21.784
  • Free Throw Pct70.4%49

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s51.0%65
  • % Pts from 3s27.7%20
  • % Pts from FTs21.3%87
  • Paint Pts / Game13.511
  • % Pts in Paint18.9%12
  • Fast Break Pts / Game4.337
  • % Pts on Fast Break6.1%38
  • Points off TOVs / Game10.032
  • % Pts off TOVs13.9%32
  • 1st Half Pts / Game34.254
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game36.835

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %53.4%29
  • Points / Shot1.2443
  • 3-Point Att Rate33.3%13
  • Assist Pct53.4%61
  • Assists / 100 Poss23.177
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.28x86
  • PF Drawn / Game18.975

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%48.6%79
  • Opp True Shooting %51.8%87
  • Opp Field Goal Pct41.0%91
  • Opp 2-Point Pct45.1%95
  • Opp 3-Point Pct35.5%31
  • Opp 3PA Rate42.8%15
  • Opp FT Att Rate30.5%68
  • Opp Points / Shot1.1788

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game62.796
  • Paint Pts Allowed9.695
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed3.382
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed6.887
  • Opp Assist Pct50.7%63
  • TOVs Forced / Game13.670

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct70.7%36
  • Turnovers Forced Pct23.6%85
  • Steal Pct10.6%66
  • Block Pct7.7%93
  • Hakeem Pct18.3%86
  • PF Efficiency0.85x98
  • Steals / PF0.38x66
  • Blocks / PF0.27x90

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
  • #5OREB%37.4%
  • #22Adj ORtg115.3
  • #31REB Diff+176
  • #31Pts Diff+316
  • #43Adj DRtg97.7
  • #43TOV%16.5%
  • #43Opp TOV%21.5%
  • #53FTAR37.6%
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
  • #3013PM Diff-52
  • #273eFG%49.0%
  • #256TS%52.8%
  • #250Opp 3P%35.5%
  • #232Opp OREB%29.3%
  • #1673P%34.5%
  • #138AST%53.4%
  • #90Opp eFG%48.6%
Game Log
Loading game log…
J. JeniferSr5'10"+2.09660.8%7915.1%298.61.72.944.4%76.1%
J. CumberlandJr6'5"+1.89354.3%5131.3%9818.84.43.638.8%77.3%
T. ScottJr6'8"+1.38353.1%4417.0%429.36.91.530.8%66.7%
N. BrooksJr6'11"+1.28157.9%6818.7%558.16.30.40.0%63.2%
K. WilliamsSo6'5"+1.07252.7%4220.9%709.93.21.127.6%70.7%
C. BroomeSr6'0"+0.86450.5%3322.3%788.31.72.228.7%75.0%
J. KozJr6'1"50.0%3116.2%360.40.40.00.0%0.0%
S. MartinSo5'10"102.5%9912.9%160.70.00.40.0%100.0%
E. NsosemeSo6'9"41.3%1210.4%81.33.20.10.0%40.6%
T. MooreSo6'5"44.4%1611.9%122.31.30.526.5%77.8%
M. DiarraFr6'9"46.7%2019.2%582.31.90.350.0%71.4%
L. JohnsonFr6'2"54.5%5219.4%602.01.20.725.0%70.0%
R. FredericksJr6'5"45.1%1714.5%252.32.20.223.5%75.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Cincinnati logo25-2618-15#4814.787111.06196.39710.086+7667+588330.6%45-286650.5%3233.9%4868.1%12
Cincinnati logo24-2519-16#4714.887112.37597.5949.285+4256+357032.2%69-969051.1%4632.4%2566.5%9
Cincinnati logo23-2422-15#2816.393113.28297.0959.391+26896+296536.3%9604550.3%3833.0%3468.8%17
Cincinnati logo22-2323-13#5112.786113.190100.4814.777+9272+1059730.9%67-547651.7%6135.1%6570.6%38
Cincinnati logo21-2218-15#1026.472104.35097.9853.773-1141+879530.0%65-658247.0%1231.5%2066.9%10
Cincinnati logo19-2020-10#4912.386109.08696.6826.481+10779-123832.0%83+113850.3%5431.9%2667.7%20
Cincinnati logo18-19728-7#2217.794115.39497.7885.981+17691-521737.4%99-1119449.0%2234.5%5170.4%49
Cincinnati logo17-18231-5#626.199114.68888.51003.977+24897+316838.0%100-1129451.0%4835.4%5569.8%30
Cincinnati logo16-17630-6#1722.595115.59293.0976.080+16387+135835.5%93-1159552.0%6634.5%4268.6%34
Cincinnati logo15-16922-11#2717.993111.98694.0965.678+15487+125936.7%94-879149.3%3734.8%5370.5%59
Cincinnati logo14-15823-11#4113.289106.77493.4944.978+15388-253037.3%95+233349.5%5432.9%3267.0%28
Cincinnati logo13-14527-7#2518.493110.67792.2985.778+14688+145939.1%97-1089547.7%2433.5%3870.8%57

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
52.8%#256
Effective FG %
49.0%#273
3-Point %
34.5%#167
3PAR
33.3%#306
FTAR
37.6%#53
Assist %
53.4%#138

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
29.3%#316
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
37.3%#346
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

25 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 44.5% of shots at 0.82 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0944.5%0.82Middle (11–20s): 28.6% of shots at 1.17 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0428.6%1.17Late (21s+): 26.8% of shots at 1.13 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9726.8%1.13SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 44.1% of shots at 0.75 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0744.1%0.75Middle (11–20s): 28.3% of shots at 1.17 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0228.3%1.17Late (21s+): 27.6% of shots at 1.14 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9527.6%1.14SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

25 games
Created byFinished by
Jarron Cumberland → Keith Williams: 9 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 2 from three)Jarron Cumberland → Justin Jenifer: 21 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 19 from three)Jarron Cumberland → Nysier Brooks: 18 assisted baskets (18 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)Jarron Cumberland → Cane Broome: 8 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 4 from three)Jarron Cumberland → Trevor Moore: 5 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 2 from three)Justin Jenifer → Jarron Cumberland: 30 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 6 mid-range · 21 from three)Justin Jenifer → Keith Williams: 13 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 4 mid-range · 4 from three)Justin Jenifer → Nysier Brooks: 6 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 0 from three)Cane Broome → Jarron Cumberland: 18 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 5 mid-range · 12 from three)Cane Broome → Keith Williams: 7 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 2 from three)Cane Broome → Justin Jenifer: 5 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)Cane Broome → Nysier Brooks: 5 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 0 from three)Keith Williams → Justin Jenifer: 6 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 5 from three)Trevor Moore → Keith Williams: 5 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 1 from three)Cumberland61 astJenifer49 astBroome35 astWilliamsMooreCumberland48 madeWilliams34 madeJenifer32 madeBrooks29 madeBroomeMoore
Jenifer is the least-assisted finisher — 93% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.