Team Stats
29 games- Net Rating-0.548
- Offensive Rating110.858
- Defensive Rating111.335
- Pace67.654
- Effective FG%48.8%32
- Off Rebound Pct33.6%87
- Turnover Pct17.9%78
- FT Attempt Rate35.3%51
Team Stats
29 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating-0.548
- Offensive Rating110.858
- Defensive Rating111.335
- Pace67.654
- Effective FG%48.8%32
- Off Rebound Pct33.6%87
- Turnover Pct17.9%78
- FT Attempt Rate35.3%51
Results & Margin
- Win Pct41.4%34
- Point Margin / Game-0.349
- Points / Game74.967
- Points Allowed / Game75.331
- 1st Half Margin-0.349
- 2nd Half Margin-0.153
- Avg Largest Lead11.160
- Avg Largest Deficit12.136
Box Score
- Points / Game74.967
- Rebounds / Game35.249
- Assists / Game12.943
- ORebs / Game12.692
- DRebs / Game22.710
- Steals / Game8.999
- Blocks / Game4.179
- Turnovers / Game12.175
- PFs / Game22.24
Shooting
- FGMs / Game26.676
- FGAs / Game60.989
- Field Goal Pct43.6%41
- 2PMs / Game20.289
- 2PAs / Game42.295
- 2-Point Pct48.0%35
- 3PMs / Game6.322
- 3PAs / Game18.826
- 3-Point Pct33.6%34
- FTMs / Game15.573
- FTAs / Game21.564
- Free Throw Pct72.1%69
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s54.0%83
- % Pts from 3s25.3%16
- % Pts from FTs20.7%64
- Paint Pts / Game20.552
- % Pts in Paint27.3%47
- Fast Break Pts / Game5.786
- % Pts on Fast Break7.5%84
- Points off TOVs / Game15.092
- % Pts off TOVs20.0%89
- 1st Half Pts / Game33.950
- 2nd Half Pts / Game40.481
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %53.2%35
- Points / Shot1.2335
- 3-Point Att Rate30.8%15
- Assist Pct48.6%26
- Assists / 100 Poss19.136
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.07x62
- PF Drawn / Game19.155
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%50.4%53
- Opp True Shooting %56.1%33
- Opp Field Goal Pct43.8%55
- Opp 2-Point Pct50.2%40
- Opp 3-Point Pct33.9%70
- Opp 3PA Rate39.3%22
- Opp FT Att Rate50.8%1
- Opp Points / Shot1.377
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game75.331
- Paint Pts Allowed17.466
- Fast Break Pts Allowed3.749
- Pts off TOVs Allowed11.552
- Opp Assist Pct64.5%1
- TOVs Forced / Game15.293
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct65.0%3
- Turnovers Forced Pct22.5%83
- Steal Pct13.2%94
- Block Pct6.0%73
- Hakeem Pct19.2%94
- PF Efficiency1.16x6
- Steals / PF0.40x89
- Blocks / PF0.18x56
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 269 D-I teams- #19FB Pts %12.3%
- #25Opp TOV%21.7%
- #43Paint Pts %44.7%
- #48OREB%33.6%
- #72TOV%17.2%
- #106Opp 3P%33.9%
- #125SOS1.3
- #141Adj ORtg105.7
- #19FB Pts %12.3%
- #25Opp TOV%21.7%
- #43Paint Pts %44.7%
- #48OREB%33.6%
- #72TOV%17.2%
- #106Opp 3P%33.9%
- #125SOS1.3
- #141Adj ORtg105.7
- #338Opp OREB%35.0%
- #2583PM Diff-29
- #258AST%48.6%
- #239REB Diff-51
- #237eFG%48.8%
- #2303P%33.6%
- #230TS%52.7%
- #185Adj DRtg104.8
Most Similar Seasons
to 2016-17- 1

Cleveland St. 2023-2420-15HorizonMost alike in Tempo, OREB%, Opp OREB%95 - 2

Tarleton St.Tarleton 2023-2422-10WACMost alike in Opp eFG%, Opp TOV%, Adj D86 - 3

Florida St.FSU 2021-2217-14ACCMost alike in FT rate, Adj O, OREB%85 - 4

Georgia St. 2021-2215-11Sun BeltMost alike in Opp eFG%, FT rate, OREB%82 - 5

Illinois ChicagoUIC 2025-2617-16MVCMost alike in Opp TOV%, eFG%, 3PA rate81 - 6

Austin Peay 2018-1920-11OVCMost alike in OREB%, Adj D, 3PA rate81 - 7

Texas A&M Corpus ChrisTAMUCC 2015-1623-8SouthlandMost alike in Tempo, FT rate, eFG%80 - 8

PittsburghPitt 2019-2016-17ACCMost alike in 3PA rate, Adj O, OREB%80 - 9

Lamar 2023-2417-14SouthlandMost alike in OREB%, FT rate, Adj D80 - 10

Cleveland St. 2022-2320-13HorizonMost alike in Adj D, eFG%, TOV%80
| T. BondTim Bond | Jr | 6'7" | +1.184 | – | – | 52.1%41 | 17.7%47 | 9.4 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 30.6% | 73.3% |
| J. Thompson IVJames Thompson IV | So | 6'10" | +1.083 | – | – | 63.9%88 | 22.8%80 | 14.9 | 11.4 | 1.0 | 0.0% | 69.3% |
| W. Mangum IVWillie Mangum IV | Sr | 6'1" | +0.877 | – | – | 55.5%57 | 28.4%96 | 15.9 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 36.9% | 68.0% |
| B. SteeleBaylee Steele | So | 6'11" | +0.360 | – | – | 53.9%49 | 11.8%12 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 85.0% |
| R. LeeRay Lee | Sr | 6'3" | +0.360 | – | – | 55.7%59 | 30.8%98 | 15.9 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 34.6% | 88.4% |
| J. NoblesJordan Nobles | So | 6'9" | +0.360 | – | – | 58.8%74 | 10.9%9 | 4.6 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 38.5% | 65.0% |
| T. ToneyTy Toney | Sr | 6'2" | +0.255 | – | – | 47.8%23 | 21.4%73 | 10.2 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 30.2% | 62.0% |
| N. MadrayNick Madray | Jr | 6'9" | – | – | – | 51.4%37 | 10.9%9 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 63.6% |
| B. BrownBlake Brown | So | 6'7" | – | – | – | 113.8%99 | 5.1%3 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 71.4% |
| Q. JonesQuaran Jones | Jr | 6'7" | – | – | – | 92.2%98 | 21.2%72 | 4.1 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.0% | 70.0% |
| J. BrownJalen Brown | Fr | 5'9" | – | – | – | 55.2%56 | 13.3%19 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| L. Wofford-HumphreyLamar Wofford-Humphrey | Jr | 6'9" | – | – | – | 65.0%90 | 12.2%13 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 14.3% | 66.7% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-21 | #239 | -5.833 | 103.119 | 108.957 | -1.360 | 041 | -2329 | 28.4%24 | +2927 | 49.7%23 | 32.2%22 | 72.8%51 | |
| 16-16 | #280 | -9.321 | 105.037 | 114.413 | -5.028 | -3429 | -2229 | 30.1%47 | +2131 | 52.6%71 | 34.9%66 | 73.7%67 | |
| 13-18 | #327 | -16.16 | 96.87 | 112.911 | -5.916 | -6023 | -4714 | 28.7%45 | +3028 | 47.8%16 | 30.4%8 | 66.7%9 | |
| 8-23 | #321 | -13.39 | 101.527 | 114.84 | -2.047 | -1754 | -707 | 25.0%17 | -1760 | 49.2%25 | 31.6%14 | 76.7%94 | |
| 10-21 | #314 | -12.613 | 95.18 | 107.728 | -3.144 | -10613 | -4914 | 23.4%11 | +4420 | 48.5%25 | 30.8%13 | 69.5%29 | |
| 16-16 | #209 | -2.244 | 94.710 | 96.881 | -0.859 | -6324 | -1012 | 27.8%44 | -7989 | 47.9%22 | 28.0%1 | 62.7%2 | |
| 15-17 | #167 | -0.153 | 103.340 | 103.460 | 2.674 | +4964 | -784 | 36.0%97 | -451 | 50.0%35 | 29.5%2 | 62.9%2 | |
| 22-13 | #154 | 0.353 | 101.928 | 101.678 | -3.925 | -1439 | -4422 | 30.1%60 | -5982 | 52.2%64 | 33.5%27 | 68.3%18 | |
| 16-17 | #152 | 1.056 | 106.160 | 105.147 | -0.956 | -841 | -3126 | 34.3%89 | -13398 | 50.0%39 | 34.3%41 | 72.5%71 | |
| 14-15 | #156 | -0.651 | 104.954 | 105.645 | 0.562 | -6628 | -893 | 32.1%70 | -10496 | 49.4%39 | 31.1%11 | 72.1%73 | |
| 17-14 | #130 | 2.961 | 100.436 | 97.580 | -1.450 | -3134 | -1141 | 31.7%57 | -11697 | 46.9%21 | 31.0%13 | 71.8%76 | |
| 19-15 | #132 | 3.564 | 99.619 | 96.194 | 0.762 | -14411 | -5616 | 31.2%45 | -12896 | 45.1%3 | 31.1%10 | 67.7%28 | |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-IShot Profile
vs D-IShot Clock
20 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 343 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 16-17. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 16-17. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.




