Grambling St.18-15

SWACCoach: Donte Jackson

18-15NET#290

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tra'Michael Moton	1,174	413	74.0%	−5.532	−0.050	+5.522	+0.960	−3.026	−0.454	+4.576	+0.444	+0.052	−5.32	−3.870
Kintavious Dozier	1,084	503	68.3%	−3.936	−6.420	−2.562	−4.214	+0.152	+1.724	−1.344	−2.372	+2.170	−4.46	−9.990
Antwan Burnett	1,036	550	65.3%	+28.0100	+9.892	−18.198	+4.188	+0.658	−3.086	+1.358	−11.198	+3.280	+0.356	−6.682
Jourdan Smith	971	616	61.2%	+11.788	+6.080	−5.778	+2.274	−1.240	−1.570	+6.082	−2.978	+1.566	−0.248	−5.176
Jonathan Aku	909	677	57.3%	−5.532	−7.318	−1.858	−0.644	+0.254	+4.84	−1.146	+0.840	+0.556	−0.740	−15.696
Jalen Johnson	802	784	50.6%	−0.350	+0.452	+0.746	−1.932	−0.350	−4.092	−4.130	−0.858	+1.968	−0.838	+9.78
Mikale Stevenson	695	892	43.8%	−1.544	−3.036	−1.558	−2.724	+5.490	+2.020	−1.444	+1.236	−0.546	+5.098	+10.18
Terrence Lewis	353	1,234	22.2%	−18.06	−2.140	+15.92	+2.778	+0.152	+1.230	−22.52	+7.02	−7.06	−0.346	+4.426
Jimel Cofer	283	1,304	17.8%	+6.272	+16.8100	+10.76	+7.698	+3.480	−2.078	+4.376	+10.60	+3.480	+4.296	+20.50
Zahad Munford	272	1,315	17.2%	+14.892	+9.792	−5.176	+2.980	−1.836	−2.986	+10.994	−2.372	−4.614	+3.290	+1.838
Malik Lamin	173	1,414	10.9%	−38.62	−24.02	+14.52	−8.04	−6.110	+5.42	−4.228	+8.60	−2.230	+0.458	−2.162
Quintin Murrell	150	1,437	9.5%	−18.26	−15.54	+2.734	−11.72	+0.960	+1.428	+16.4100	+1.830	−3.918	+2.988	+12.64

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tra'Michael Moton	1,174	413	74.0%	-6.936	100.030	106.948	47.8%34	30.6%50	19.9%26	35.8%66	49.2%54	64.5%32	17.8%56	29.1%48
Kintavious Dozier	1,084	503	68.3%	-6.836	98.026	104.754	46.2%28	31.4%54	20.6%22	34.2%62	48.5%58	65.2%34	17.7%56	27.0%56
Antwan Burnett	1,036	550	65.3%	4.154	103.436	99.368	49.0%40	31.6%54	19.0%32	35.1%64	45.4%72	65.5%36	19.2%66	27.8%52
Jourdan Smith	971	616	61.2%	-1.044	102.434	103.358	48.4%38	30.9%52	19.5%30	37.0%68	48.0%60	65.1%34	19.0%64	28.0%52
Jonathan Aku	909	677	57.3%	-7.934	96.924	104.854	47.3%32	31.5%54	22.1%16	34.1%62	49.5%54	64.7%32	18.8%62	23.7%66
Jalen Johnson	802	784	50.6%	-5.738	100.230	105.952	46.7%30	31.3%52	18.1%38	32.7%58	48.7%58	65.5%36	18.7%62	35.0%32
Mikale Stevenson	695	892	43.8%	-6.336	98.326	104.754	46.1%28	34.4%64	21.2%20	33.8%60	49.8%54	64.3%30	21.9%80	35.9%30
Terrence Lewis	353	1,234	22.2%	-19.420	98.426	117.824	49.7%42	31.5%54	21.0%20	17.4%16	54.5%30	59.1%16	18.8%64	33.3%34
Jimel Cofer	283	1,304	17.8%	-0.446	113.962	114.330	53.8%64	34.3%64	18.4%36	38.1%70	58.1%18	67.5%44	22.6%84	47.4%12
Zahad Munford	272	1,315	17.2%	6.858	108.048	101.364	50.0%42	29.9%46	17.6%42	43.7%80	47.2%64	60.8%20	21.8%80	31.5%42
Malik Lamin	173	1,414	10.9%	-39.96	78.66	118.522	40.4%12	26.0%30	24.9%8	30.9%54	56.8%22	62.5%24	19.5%68	28.1%52
Quintin Murrell	150	1,437	9.5%	-22.016	86.010	108.046	37.0%6	32.2%56	21.3%20	49.6%86	50.8%48	61.0%20	21.7%80	41.5%20

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tra'Michael Moton	1,174	413	74.0%	-1.444	100.130	101.464	46.9%32	33.6%62	20.3%24	31.4%54	48.8%56	64.5%32	23.1%86	32.8%38
Kintavious Dozier	1,084	503	68.3%	-2.842	104.440	107.248	50.5%48	31.3%52	18.9%34	35.5%64	50.7%48	63.1%26	22.1%82	36.9%28
Antwan Burnett	1,036	550	65.3%	-23.816	93.618	117.424	44.9%24	31.0%52	22.0%18	33.8%60	56.5%22	62.4%24	18.9%64	34.3%34
Jourdan Smith	971	616	61.2%	-12.726	96.322	109.044	46.3%28	32.2%56	21.0%22	31.0%54	50.9%46	63.6%28	19.2%66	33.1%36
Jonathan Aku	909	677	57.3%	-2.342	104.238	106.650	47.9%36	31.3%52	17.3%44	35.2%64	48.7%58	64.3%30	19.5%68	39.3%22
Jalen Johnson	802	784	50.6%	-5.438	99.830	105.254	48.6%38	31.6%54	22.1%16	36.8%68	49.5%54	63.6%28	19.5%68	25.3%60
Mikale Stevenson	695	892	43.8%	-4.838	101.332	106.250	48.8%38	29.0%42	19.2%32	35.2%64	48.7%58	64.7%32	16.9%50	25.8%58
Terrence Lewis	353	1,234	22.2%	-1.444	100.530	101.962	46.9%32	31.4%52	19.8%28	39.9%74	47.5%64	66.0%36	19.2%66	29.0%48
Jimel Cofer	283	1,304	17.8%	-6.636	97.024	103.658	46.2%28	30.9%52	20.4%24	33.9%60	47.5%64	64.1%30	18.4%60	26.9%56
Zahad Munford	272	1,315	17.2%	-8.034	98.426	106.450	47.1%32	31.7%54	20.5%24	32.8%58	49.5%54	65.3%34	18.6%62	29.7%46
Malik Lamin	173	1,414	10.9%	-1.444	102.634	104.056	48.4%38	32.1%56	19.5%30	35.0%64	48.2%60	64.8%32	19.1%64	30.2%44
Quintin Murrell	150	1,437	9.5%	-3.840	101.532	105.354	48.6%38	31.3%52	19.9%26	33.1%58	49.0%56	64.9%34	18.8%64	28.9%50

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.