Hampton11-19

CAACoach: Ivan Thomas

11-19NET#267

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Xzavier Long	1,689	283	85.7%	+4.568	−1.840	−6.382	−1.634	−0.546	+0.836	+13.798	−1.162	+5.894	+0.966	+18.00
Daniel Johnson	1,250	721	63.4%	+4.166	+1.458	−2.764	−1.336	+1.366	−2.282	−6.220	+0.346	+2.778	+1.980	+1.540
Jalyke Gaines-Wyatt	1,192	780	60.5%	−5.730	+1.660	+7.312	+0.860	−5.012	−1.066	+10.194	+4.112	−1.832	−0.936	+3.330
Etienne Strothers	942	1,029	47.8%	+9.986	+7.988	−2.060	+4.490	+4.286	+2.514	+9.792	+2.126	−1.336	+5.1100	+3.430
Josh Ogundele	737	1,235	37.4%	+7.980	+7.086	−0.854	+5.594	+0.758	+0.048	+1.460	−0.454	+1.262	−0.542	−13.296
Kody Williams	732	1,239	37.2%	−9.120	−9.412	−0.352	−2.624	−5.310	+0.246	−5.722	−2.374	−1.040	−1.132	+10.96
Michael Eley	699	1,272	35.5%	+7.678	+16.1100	+8.510	+4.892	+3.482	−3.290	+1.560	+5.86	−0.348	+0.762	+2.932
Christian Watson	667	1,304	33.8%	−2.142	+1.156	+3.230	−0.248	+3.884	+2.018	+3.572	−1.060	+1.768	−2.416	+4.524
Eunique Rink	518	1,453	26.3%	−28.22	−14.14	+14.22	−6.16	+3.884	+5.02	−7.514	+5.36	−7.44	−3.110	−3.368
Aidan Haskins	459	1,512	23.3%	−0.350	−6.320	−6.080	−3.220	−5.410	−4.294	−9.210	−3.280	+0.354	+0.866	−2.966
Elijah Kennedy	427	1,544	21.7%	+17.096	+1.458	−15.698	+2.576	−0.348	+0.540	−1.542	−7.296	+3.382	+1.678	+0.348
Quintin Cooper	292	1,679	14.8%	−2.940	−7.816	−4.976	−1.832	−3.322	−0.252	−8.312	−5.592	−2.130	−3.86	−11.294
Peter Oduro	174	1,798	8.8%	+1.356	−8.214	−9.490	−5.48	+1.062	+1.032	−8.112	−3.986	+2.980	−1.328	−26.998

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Xzavier Long	1,689	283	85.7%	-5.236	102.130	107.350	45.6%22	32.4%60	17.1%40	41.7%70	52.1%44	71.3%56	17.4%60	50.0%14
Daniel Johnson	1,250	721	63.4%	-4.338	102.932	107.350	45.4%22	32.9%62	16.2%46	37.4%60	52.4%44	71.4%56	17.9%62	47.7%16
Jalyke Gaines-Wyatt	1,192	780	60.5%	-8.232	103.032	111.240	46.2%24	30.4%52	16.5%44	43.8%74	53.9%36	69.7%48	16.9%56	48.4%16
Etienne Strothers	942	1,029	47.8%	-0.744	106.540	107.250	48.2%32	34.7%68	18.3%32	44.8%74	53.4%40	69.7%48	19.9%76	49.0%14
Josh Ogundele	737	1,235	37.4%	-0.944	106.840	107.748	49.4%36	32.9%62	17.0%40	40.5%66	52.0%46	71.2%54	16.9%56	39.0%32
Kody Williams	732	1,239	37.2%	-11.628	96.520	108.148	44.2%18	29.2%46	17.1%40	36.0%58	50.8%52	69.8%48	16.6%52	54.0%10
Michael Eley	699	1,272	35.5%	-0.944	112.856	113.734	48.9%34	34.7%68	14.9%58	40.6%66	56.0%28	70.3%50	17.7%62	49.0%14
Christian Watson	667	1,304	33.8%	-7.334	103.132	110.442	45.7%22	34.9%68	18.3%32	41.9%70	51.6%48	71.5%58	15.6%46	50.1%14
Eunique Rink	518	1,453	26.3%	-26.612	92.014	118.724	41.4%12	35.2%70	20.6%18	34.1%52	56.1%28	64.9%28	15.0%42	44.7%20
Aidan Haskins	459	1,512	23.3%	-6.134	97.622	103.760	43.5%16	28.4%44	13.7%66	32.7%48	49.9%58	70.7%52	17.8%62	44.9%20
Elijah Kennedy	427	1,544	21.7%	7.458	103.532	96.176	47.8%30	32.2%60	17.3%38	38.4%62	46.6%70	72.9%62	18.5%68	47.3%18
Quintin Cooper	292	1,679	14.8%	-8.332	95.718	104.158	44.3%18	29.7%50	16.8%42	32.5%48	47.7%66	68.7%44	14.0%34	37.7%34
Peter Oduro	174	1,798	8.8%	-4.738	95.018	99.768	41.0%10	33.3%66	17.8%34	32.3%48	48.8%60	73.0%64	16.1%50	23.0%76

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Xzavier Long	1,689	283	85.7%	-9.730	104.034	113.734	47.2%28	32.9%62	16.3%46	28.0%36	53.2%40	65.5%30	16.5%52	32.0%50
Daniel Johnson	1,250	721	63.4%	-8.532	101.528	110.044	46.7%26	31.6%58	18.3%30	43.6%72	52.1%44	68.7%44	16.0%50	46.2%18
Jalyke Gaines-Wyatt	1,192	780	60.5%	-2.442	101.428	103.958	45.4%22	35.4%70	17.6%36	33.7%52	49.8%58	71.5%58	17.8%62	45.2%20
Etienne Strothers	942	1,029	47.8%	-10.628	98.624	109.246	43.8%16	30.6%52	15.7%50	35.1%54	51.3%48	71.0%54	14.8%40	45.5%20
Josh Ogundele	737	1,235	37.4%	-8.832	99.826	108.646	43.8%16	32.2%60	16.9%40	39.1%64	52.4%44	70.0%48	17.4%60	52.1%12
Kody Williams	732	1,239	37.2%	-2.542	105.938	108.348	46.8%26	34.5%68	16.9%40	41.7%70	53.1%40	70.8%52	17.6%62	43.1%24
Michael Eley	699	1,272	35.5%	-8.532	96.720	105.254	44.1%18	31.3%56	18.1%32	39.0%64	50.2%52	70.5%52	17.0%56	46.1%18
Christian Watson	667	1,304	33.8%	-5.136	102.030	107.250	45.9%24	31.2%54	16.3%46	38.4%62	52.6%42	69.9%48	18.0%64	45.6%20
Eunique Rink	518	1,453	26.3%	1.648	106.138	104.556	47.5%28	31.4%56	15.6%52	41.6%68	50.8%52	72.3%60	18.0%64	48.0%16
Aidan Haskins	459	1,512	23.3%	-5.836	103.934	109.744	46.6%26	33.9%66	17.9%34	41.9%70	53.0%40	70.3%50	17.0%56	47.8%16
Elijah Kennedy	427	1,544	21.7%	-9.630	102.130	111.740	45.3%22	32.5%60	16.8%40	39.9%66	53.8%38	69.6%48	16.9%56	47.1%18
Quintin Cooper	292	1,679	14.8%	-5.436	103.632	109.046	46.1%24	33.0%62	17.0%40	40.9%68	53.2%40	70.8%52	17.8%62	49.0%14
Peter Oduro	174	1,798	8.8%	-6.036	103.132	109.146	46.4%24	32.4%60	16.9%40	40.3%66	52.7%42	70.1%50	17.3%60	49.9%14

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.