Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
CAA
Hofstra logo

Hofstra

20-14NET#84Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #118Coach: Joe Mihalich
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
WJacksonville logoLN.C. State logoWStony Brook logoWWagner logoLSouth Florida logoWJackson St. logoWNorfolk St. logoWAppalachian St. logoWCoppin St. logoLColumbia logoLLa Salle logoWLBWCentral Connecticut logoWUNC Wilmington logoWDelaware logoWCharleston logoWElon logoLNortheastern logoLUNC Wilmington logoWDrexel logoLJames Madison logoLWilliam & Mary logoLTowson logoWDelaware logoWElon logoLNortheastern logoWDrexel logoWTowson logoLWilliam & Mary logoWCharleston logoLJames Madison logoWJames Madison logoLWilliam & Mary logoLVermont logo

Team Stats

34 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating13.591
  • Offensive Rating128.489
  • Defensive Rating114.934
  • Pace61.158
  • Effective FG%52.3%82
  • Off Rebound Pct32.6%69
  • Turnover Pct18.2%85
  • FT Attempt Rate39.8%71

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct58.8%66
  • Point Margin / Game8.291
  • Points / Game78.597
  • Points Allowed / Game70.223
  • 1st Half Margin3.984
  • 2nd Half Margin4.493
  • Avg Largest Lead
  • Avg Largest Deficit

Box Score

  • Points / Game78.597
  • Rebounds / Game36.581
  • Assists / Game15.494
  • ORebs / Game11.875
  • DRebs / Game24.672
  • Steals / Game7.586
  • Blocks / Game2.624
  • Turnovers / Game11.186
  • PFs / Game19.130

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game26.592
  • FGAs / Game59.294
  • Field Goal Pct44.8%73
  • 2PMs / Game17.660
  • 2PAs / Game34.637
  • 2-Point Pct50.9%80
  • 3PMs / Game8.996
  • 3PAs / Game24.696
  • 3-Point Pct36.2%75
  • FTMs / Game16.591
  • FTAs / Game23.693
  • Free Throw Pct70.0%60

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s44.9%10
  • % Pts from 3s34.1%88
  • % Pts from FTs21.0%58
  • Paint Pts / Game22.989
  • % Pts in Paint29.2%66
  • Fast Break Pts / Game4.984
  • % Pts on Fast Break6.3%73
  • Points off TOVs / Game13.291
  • % Pts off TOVs16.8%69
  • 1st Half Pts / Game36.495
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game41.598

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %56.4%83
  • Points / Shot1.3386
  • 3-Point Att Rate41.6%91
  • Assist Pct58.2%80
  • Assists / 100 Poss25.388
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.39x96
  • PF Drawn / Game19.582

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%49.8%42
  • Opp True Shooting %54.3%37
  • Opp Field Goal Pct44.1%38
  • Opp 2-Point Pct49.1%37
  • Opp 3-Point Pct34.1%53
  • Opp 3PA Rate33.6%57
  • Opp FT Att Rate39.1%37
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2736

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game70.223
  • Paint Pts Allowed22.317
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed3.738
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed10.247
  • Opp Assist Pct54.2%40
  • TOVs Forced / Game13.883

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct71.5%82
  • Turnovers Forced Pct22.6%73
  • Steal Pct12.2%80
  • Block Pct4.3%20
  • Hakeem Pct16.6%57
  • PF Efficiency1.01x61
  • Steals / PF0.39x76
  • Blocks / PF0.14x22

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
  • #163PM Diff+94
  • #25TOV%16.1%
  • #35Pts Diff+280
  • #43Opp OREB%27.6%
  • #45Adj ORtg110.4
  • #61TS%55.7%
  • #63eFG%52.3%
  • #69AST%58.2%
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
  • #261SOS-3.9
  • #218Opp eFG%49.8%
  • #175Adj DRtg103.1
  • #171Opp 3P%34.1%
  • #141Opp TOV%19.8%
  • #111OREB%33.2%
  • #102FTAR39.8%
  • #96FB Pts %8.7%
Game Log
Loading game log…
J. GreenJr6'3"+2.39855.5%6525.5%9017.14.36.533.5%82.5%
D. NesmithSr6'1"+1.59157.4%7418.8%5511.13.22.633.1%82.9%
M. KoneSr6'7"+1.38667.5%9418.1%508.85.60.50.0%60.0%
A. TanksleyJr6'6"+1.18257.8%7623.4%8316.25.51.439.8%69.2%
B. BernardiSo6'2"+1.18060.5%8414.2%2311.63.11.740.4%85.5%
R. GustysFr6'9"+0.66255.4%6519.5%605.25.70.80.0%41.5%
M. NicholsJr6'6"+0.34652.0%4923.0%816.14.91.214.3%46.3%
J. RobinsonSo6'5"+0.03140.8%1315.3%304.02.20.830.0%63.9%
D. FowlkesSo6'1"59.5%8116.9%420.90.00.1100.0%100.0%
E. GonzalezFr6'3"56.7%7123.1%811.30.30.30.0%42.9%
A. WalkerFr6'10"46.8%269.6%71.33.00.20.0%50.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Hofstra logo25-261324-11#898.076113.876105.875-2.054+17488+728935.3%86+183652.1%5437.0%9274.5%73
Hofstra logo24-2515-18#201-2.545100.513103.078-3.941-339+246425.7%14+93950.0%3034.0%5071.5%42
Hofstra logo23-2420-13#1046.571109.970103.470-0.761-8317+568423.6%7-517755.7%9637.1%9475.3%87
Hofstra logo22-2325-10#819.678110.477100.878-1.948-9715+678823.8%10-668455.3%9636.7%8673.9%73
Hofstra logo21-2221-11#1154.368108.776104.448-0.658-8018+135823.7%13-1409853.9%9034.0%5279.7%100
Hofstra logo19-2026-8#1016.472108.784102.352-4.033+3557+588230.4%68-828852.0%7737.5%9478.3%98
Hofstra logo18-1927-8#689.681118.297108.628-4.324+1448+377227.8%41-1089356.1%9738.5%9580.2%100
Hofstra logo17-1819-12#1492.158111.879109.827-0.659+6169+236531.1%70-276653.4%7737.5%8468.2%18
Hofstra logo16-1715-17#191-1.546110.381111.811-1.452+1548+498231.4%70+24752.0%6736.7%7368.4%32
Hofstra logo15-1623-10#1006.972110.580103.5560.763+7469+297131.8%68+24851.6%6935.6%6268.9%40
Hofstra logo14-1520-14#847.376110.488103.149-3.925+11280+949633.2%68-759052.3%8236.2%7570.0%59
Hofstra logo13-1410-23#267-7.223104.947112.113-0.655+8771-134235.5%87+751048.4%3433.4%3765.9%14

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
55.7%#60
Effective FG %
52.3%#62
3-Point %
36.2%#85
3PAR
41.6%#33
FTAR
39.8%#100
Assist %
58.2%#69

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
36.5%#144
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
23.7%#55
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

26 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 52.8% of shots at 0.78 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0952.8%0.78Middle (11–20s): 29.6% of shots at 1.29 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0429.6%1.29Late (21s+): 17.6% of shots at 1.27 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9717.6%1.27SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 46.4% of shots at 0.70 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0746.4%0.70Middle (11–20s): 26.7% of shots at 1.31 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0226.7%1.31Late (21s+): 27.0% of shots at 1.27 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9527.0%1.27SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

26 games
Created byFinished by
Juan'ya Green → Ameen Tanksley: 31 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 4 mid-range · 23 from three)Juan'ya Green → Brian Bernardi: 32 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 27 from three)Juan'ya Green → Moussa Kone: 30 assisted baskets (26 at the rim · 4 mid-range · 0 from three)Juan'ya Green → Dion Nesmith: 28 assisted baskets (9 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 18 from three)Juan'ya Green → Malik Nichols: 13 assisted baskets (11 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 1 from three)Juan'ya Green → Jamall Robinson: 13 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 11 from three)Dion Nesmith → Ameen Tanksley: 18 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 10 from three)Dion Nesmith → Brian Bernardi: 11 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 7 from three)Dion Nesmith → Juan'ya Green: 17 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 9 from three)Brian Bernardi → Ameen Tanksley: 14 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 9 from three)Brian Bernardi → Moussa Kone: 9 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 0 from three)Brian Bernardi → Juan'ya Green: 9 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 8 from three)Ameen Tanksley → Brian Bernardi: 12 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 10 from three)Ameen Tanksley → Juan'ya Green: 11 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 7 from three)Green147 astNesmith46 astBernardi32 astTanksley23 astTanksley63 madeBernardi55 madeKone39 madeGreen37 madeNesmith28 madeNicholsRobinson
Tanksley is the least-assisted finisher — 73% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 14-15. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 14-15. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.