Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
CAA
Hofstra logo

Hofstra

13-10NET#164Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #118Coach: Joe Mihalich
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
LRutgers logoWFairleigh Dickinson logoLIona logoWStony Brook logoWMonmouth logoLSt. Bonaventure logoWRichmond logoWWilliam & Mary logoWWilliam & Mary logoLNortheastern logoLNortheastern logoLDelaware logoWDelaware logoWTowson logoWTowson logoWUNC Wilmington logoWUNC Wilmington logoLDrexel logoWDrexel logoLJames Madison logoLJames Madison logoWDelaware logoLElon logo

Team Stats

23 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating0.343
  • Offensive Rating130.294
  • Defensive Rating129.94
  • Pace56.27
  • Effective FG%50.8%57
  • Off Rebound Pct29.3%66
  • Turnover Pct21.6%29
  • FT Attempt Rate33.0%62

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct56.5%62
  • Point Margin / Game0.243
  • Points / Game73.266
  • Points Allowed / Game73.027
  • 1st Half Margin0.851
  • 2nd Half Margin-0.736
  • Avg Largest Lead10.140
  • Avg Largest Deficit8.668

Box Score

  • Points / Game73.266
  • Rebounds / Game35.554
  • Assists / Game12.739
  • ORebs / Game10.564
  • DRebs / Game25.040
  • Steals / Game6.654
  • Blocks / Game3.047
  • Turnovers / Game12.172
  • PFs / Game16.078

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game25.956
  • FGAs / Game58.354
  • Field Goal Pct44.3%53
  • 2PMs / Game18.352
  • 2PAs / Game35.439
  • 2-Point Pct51.7%68
  • 3PMs / Game7.661
  • 3PAs / Game22.967
  • 3-Point Pct33.0%40
  • FTMs / Game13.867
  • FTAs / Game19.366
  • Free Throw Pct71.6%55

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s50.0%40
  • % Pts from 3s31.0%53
  • % Pts from FTs18.8%61
  • Paint Pts / Game24.085
  • % Pts in Paint32.8%81
  • Fast Break Pts / Game7.377
  • % Pts on Fast Break10.0%77
  • Points off TOVs / Game10.327
  • % Pts off TOVs14.1%24
  • 1st Half Pts / Game35.475
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game37.355

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %54.8%61
  • Points / Shot1.2560
  • 3-Point Att Rate39.3%65
  • Assist Pct49.2%31
  • Assists / 100 Poss22.777
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.05x59
  • PF Drawn / Game18.373

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%51.1%38
  • Opp True Shooting %54.5%40
  • Opp Field Goal Pct44.7%40
  • Opp 2-Point Pct51.4%30
  • Opp 3-Point Pct33.8%50
  • Opp 3PA Rate38.1%41
  • Opp FT Att Rate25.8%87
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2161

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game73.027
  • Paint Pts Allowed24.715
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed6.433
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed11.554
  • Opp Assist Pct60.4%5
  • TOVs Forced / Game12.025

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct71.1%39
  • Turnovers Forced Pct21.4%71
  • Steal Pct11.8%82
  • Block Pct5.3%62
  • Hakeem Pct17.0%78
  • PF Efficiency0.88x94
  • Steals / PF0.41x68
  • Blocks / PF0.18x52

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 347 D-I teams
  • #100TOV%17.6%
  • #113Adj ORtg106.4
  • #119FB Pts %12.7%
  • #122Paint Pts %41.4%
  • #135FTAR33.0%
  • #136OREB%29.3%
  • #138TS%54.2%
  • #152eFG%50.8%
Where they rank worstof 347 D-I teams
  • #273Opp TOV%17.5%
  • #258Adj DRtg106.6
  • #242AST%49.2%
  • #239Opp eFG%51.1%
  • #222Opp OREB%28.9%
  • #2083P%33.0%
  • #199Pts Diff+4
  • #192Opp 3P%33.8%
Game Log
Loading game log…
T. CoburnSr6'5"+1.59162.9%8519.4%6015.13.80.939.6%82.0%
J. RaySr6'2"+1.48855.2%5925.7%9019.33.33.337.0%84.3%
K. CramerFr6'6"+0.76559.4%7516.8%418.96.70.723.8%42.9%
I. KanteJr6'7"+0.44660.5%7920.7%6912.910.10.70.0%70.7%
C. BurgessSo6'3"+0.34145.9%2319.5%618.33.35.626.7%57.6%
O. SilverioJr6'3"-0.31748.3%2918.3%524.81.20.729.4%78.6%
S. TrueheartSr6'8"54.9%5712.4%162.01.10.333.3%100.0%
K. SchutteJr6'9"52.4%4513.2%191.72.70.20.0%50.0%
V. MasicFr6'5"38.0%1216.4%392.71.20.821.2%77.8%
Z. BetheaFr6'3"0.0%219.7%620.00.00.00.0%0.0%
S. CowartJr6'2"41.0%1516.3%381.31.01.30.0%100.0%
D. GreenFr6'7"42.0%1618.3%523.11.70.228.6%62.5%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Hofstra logo25-261324-11#898.076113.876105.875-2.054+17488+728935.3%86+183652.1%5437.0%9274.5%73
Hofstra logo24-2515-18#201-2.545100.513103.078-3.941-339+246425.7%14+93950.0%3034.0%5071.5%42
Hofstra logo23-2420-13#1046.571109.970103.470-0.761-8317+568423.6%7-517755.7%9637.1%9475.3%87
Hofstra logo22-2325-10#819.678110.477100.878-1.948-9715+678823.8%10-668455.3%9636.7%8673.9%73
Hofstra logo21-2221-11#1154.368108.776104.448-0.658-8018+135823.7%13-1409853.9%9034.0%5279.7%100
Hofstra logo19-2026-8#1016.472108.784102.352-4.033+3557+588230.4%68-828852.0%7737.5%9478.3%98
Hofstra logo18-1927-8#689.681118.297108.628-4.324+1448+377227.8%41-1089356.1%9738.5%9580.2%100
Hofstra logo17-1819-12#1492.158111.879109.827-0.659+6169+236531.1%70-276653.4%7737.5%8468.2%18
Hofstra logo16-1715-17#191-1.546110.381111.811-1.452+1548+498231.4%70+24752.0%6736.7%7368.4%32
Hofstra logo15-1623-10#1006.972110.580103.5560.763+7469+297131.8%68+24851.6%6935.6%6268.9%40
Hofstra logo14-1520-14#847.376110.488103.149-3.925+11280+949633.2%68-759052.3%8236.2%7570.0%59
Hofstra logo13-1410-23#267-7.223104.947112.113-0.655+8771-134235.5%87+751048.4%3433.4%3765.9%14

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
54.2%#133
Effective FG %
50.8%#147
3-Point %
33.0%#206
3PAR
39.3%#122
FTAR
33.0%#131
Assist %
49.2%#242

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
31.2%#262
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
24.1%#106
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

13 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 36.7% of shots at 1.13 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0936.7%1.13Middle (11–20s): 38.7% of shots at 1.06 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0438.7%1.06Late (21s+): 24.6% of shots at 0.90 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9724.6%0.90SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 35.4% of shots at 1.09 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0735.4%1.09Middle (11–20s): 34.5% of shots at 0.94 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0234.5%0.94Late (21s+): 30.1% of shots at 1.06 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9530.1%1.06SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

13 games
Created byFinished by
Caleb Burgess → Tareq Coburn: 20 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 17 from three)Caleb Burgess → Isaac Kante: 13 assisted baskets (10 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 0 from three)Caleb Burgess → Jalen Ray: 20 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 17 from three)Caleb Burgess → Kvonn Cramer: 12 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 5 from three)Jalen Ray → Tareq Coburn: 14 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 13 from three)Jalen Ray → Isaac Kante: 9 assisted baskets (7 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 0 from three)Jalen Ray → Kvonn Cramer: 9 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 3 from three)Jalen Ray → Caleb Burgess: 4 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 3 from three)Jalen Ray → David Green: 4 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Vukasin Masic → Tareq Coburn: 4 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 3 from three)Vukasin Masic → Isaac Kante: 4 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Tareq Coburn → Isaac Kante: 3 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 0 from three)Tareq Coburn → Jalen Ray: 3 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 3 from three)Kvonn Cramer → Isaac Kante: 4 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 0 from three)Burgess65 astRay40 astMasic8 astCoburnCramerCoburn38 madeKante33 madeRay23 madeCramer21 madeBurgessGreen
Ray is the least-assisted finisher — 86% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 20-21. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 20-21. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.