Schedule
W
WL
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
WL
L
L
W
WWL
L
LW
WW
W
LW
L
WLWLLLLWWWWWLWLWWLLLWWWLLLWWWWLWLTeam Stats
34 games- Net Rating3.367
- Offensive Rating108.749
- Defensive Rating105.363
- Pace74.199
- Effective FG%52.5%79
- Off Rebound Pct31.8%78
- Turnover Pct18.7%65
- FT Attempt Rate34.9%47
Team Stats
34 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating3.367
- Offensive Rating108.749
- Defensive Rating105.363
- Pace74.199
- Effective FG%52.5%79
- Off Rebound Pct31.8%78
- Turnover Pct18.7%65
- FT Attempt Rate34.9%47
Results & Margin
- Win Pct55.9%63
- Point Margin / Game2.568
- Points / Game80.593
- Points Allowed / Game78.116
- 1st Half Margin2.472
- 2nd Half Margin0.157
- Avg Largest Lead12.976
- Avg Largest Deficit10.154
Box Score
- Points / Game80.593
- Rebounds / Game38.489
- Assists / Game17.799
- ORebs / Game12.084
- DRebs / Game26.482
- Steals / Game7.489
- Blocks / Game3.872
- Turnovers / Game13.927
- PFs / Game17.973
Shooting
- FGMs / Game28.495
- FGAs / Game62.494
- Field Goal Pct45.4%70
- 2PMs / Game19.579
- 2PAs / Game39.176
- 2-Point Pct49.9%58
- 3PMs / Game8.886
- 3PAs / Game23.377
- 3-Point Pct37.9%85
- FTMs / Game15.064
- FTAs / Game21.868
- Free Throw Pct68.8%36
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s48.5%37
- % Pts from 3s32.9%71
- % Pts from FTs18.6%30
- Paint Pts / Game19.244
- % Pts in Paint23.8%33
- Fast Break Pts / Game4.062
- % Pts on Fast Break4.9%50
- Points off TOVs / Game11.654
- % Pts off TOVs14.4%38
- 1st Half Pts / Game38.493
- 2nd Half Pts / Game40.178
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %55.9%71
- Points / Shot1.2965
- 3-Point Att Rate37.3%57
- Assist Pct62.4%97
- Assists / 100 Poss23.989
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.28x89
- PF Drawn / Game19.871
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%51.0%45
- Opp True Shooting %53.9%60
- Opp Field Goal Pct44.5%45
- Opp 2-Point Pct49.5%50
- Opp 3-Point Pct35.8%39
- Opp 3PA Rate36.8%43
- Opp FT Att Rate27.5%92
- Opp Points / Shot1.2175
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game78.116
- Paint Pts Allowed20.645
- Fast Break Pts Allowed4.433
- Pts off TOVs Allowed10.166
- Opp Assist Pct60.1%8
- TOVs Forced / Game14.381
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct67.7%15
- Turnovers Forced Pct19.3%47
- Steal Pct10.0%69
- Block Pct5.2%55
- Hakeem Pct15.2%64
- PF Efficiency0.90x85
- Steals / PF0.41x92
- Blocks / PF0.21x74
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 350 D-I teams- #12AST%62.4%
- #48Adj ORtg111.2
- #513P%37.9%
- #57SOS8.0
- #68FB Pts %9.5%
- #75eFG%52.5%
- #80OREB%31.8%
- #103TS%55.3%
Where they rank bestof 350 D-I teams
- #12AST%62.4%
- #48Adj ORtg111.2
- #513P%37.9%
- #57SOS8.0
- #68FB Pts %9.5%
- #75eFG%52.5%
- #80OREB%31.8%
- #103TS%55.3%
Where they rank worstof 350 D-I teams
- #296Opp OREB%32.3%
- #213Opp 3P%35.8%
- #192Opp eFG%51.0%
- #183FTAR34.9%
- #181TOV%18.7%
- #179Paint Pts %38.6%
- #174REB Diff+3
- #1373PM Diff+11
Most Similar Seasons
to 2016-17- 1
Georgia 2019-2015-16SECMost alike in Adj D, 3PA rate, Adj O91 - 2Iowa St. 2019-2012-20Big 12Most alike in TOV%, Adj O, 3PA rate89
- 3
Georgia St. 2019-2017-13Sun BeltMost alike in TOV%, Adj D, OREB%88 - 4
UCF 2024-2519-18Big 12Most alike in Adj O, Adj D, OREB%88 - 5
Florida AtlanticFAU 2024-2517-16AmericanMost alike in 3PA rate, FT rate, eFG%87 - 6
Hofstra 2019-2025-8CAAMost alike in eFG%, Adj O, 3PA rate87 - 7
SMU 2020-2111-6AmericanMost alike in FT rate, eFG%, Adj O87 - 8
ConnecticutUConn 2018-1916-17AmericanMost alike in FT rate, Adj D, TOV%86 - 9Memphis 2023-2422-10AmericanMost alike in Adj O, eFG%, 3PA rate86
- 10
Oregon 2021-2219-15Pac 12Most alike in Opp TOV%, FT rate, Opp OREB%86
Schedule
Loading the schedule
| N. BaerNicholas Baer | So | 6'7" | +2.599 | – | – | 57.3%67 | 15.0%28 | 7.5 | 5.8 | 1.7 | 39.7% | 61.4% |
| P. JokPeter Jok | Sr | 6'6" | +1.894 | – | – | 58.7%73 | 28.4%96 | 19.9 | 5.5 | 2.6 | 38.0% | 91.1% |
| J. BohannonJordan Bohannon | Fr | 6'0" | +1.693 | – | – | 56.7%64 | 19.6%61 | 10.9 | 2.2 | 5.1 | 41.6% | 85.5% |
| A. WagnerAhmad Wagner | So | 6'7" | +1.388 | – | – | 51.5%38 | 18.3%52 | 4.8 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 0.0% | 46.3% |
| C. PemslCordell Pemsl | Fr | 6'8" | +1.184 | – | – | 62.5%86 | 21.8%75 | 8.9 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 0.0% | 57.5% |
| I. MossIsaiah Moss | Fr | 6'5" | +0.362 | – | – | 50.5%34 | 19.1%58 | 6.5 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 35.8% | 74.2% |
| T. CookTyler Cook | Fr | 6'9" | +0.257 | – | – | 58.1%71 | 24.8%88 | 12.3 | 5.3 | 1.0 | 25.0% | 59.8% |
| D. UhlDom Uhl | Jr | 6'9" | – | – | – | 47.1%22 | 16.4%38 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 23.8% | 67.3% |
| B. EllingsonBrady Ellingson | So | 6'4" | – | – | – | 62.2%85 | 12.4%14 | 4.4 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 47.1% | 100.0% |
| C. WilliamsChristian Williams | So | 6'5" | – | – | – | 38.5%10 | 15.5%32 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 15.4% | 51.9% |
| D. JonesDale Jones | Jr | 6'7" | – | – | – | 18.8%3 | 29.1%97 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 14.3% | 0.0% |
| C. RoseCharlie Rose | Fr | 6'4" | – | – | – | 33.3%7 | 20.6%68 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| R. KrienerRyan Kriener | Fr | 6'9" | – | – | – | 56.9%65 | 18.6%54 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 20.0% | 60.0% |
| M. DaileyMaishe Dailey | Fr | 6'6" | – | – | – | 54.8%54 | 14.9%28 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 33.3% | 50.0% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-269 | 24-13 | #21 | 22.295 | 123.295 | 100.991 | 11.693 | +1746 | +5780 | 30.2%41 | -12195 | 56.4%95 | 35.4%73 | 76.9%92 |
| 24-25 | 17-16 | #65 | 11.883 | 119.394 | 107.552 | 10.388 | -1625 | +4980 | 25.1%11 | -10091 | 56.8%97 | 38.0%94 | 70.5%33 |
| 23-24 | 19-15 | #55 | 12.785 | 118.396 | 105.659 | 9.894 | -5226 | -4617 | 27.4%31 | -8188 | 52.8%76 | 35.1%66 | 77.4%95 |
| 22-238 | 19-14 | #40 | 13.989 | 119.499 | 105.550 | 8.793 | +6262 | +3169 | 32.1%79 | -9991 | 51.7%60 | 34.0%47 | 73.8%72 |
| 21-225 | 26-10 | #13 | 21.897 | 120.9100 | 99.179 | 7.585 | +5161 | +7288 | 32.3%84 | -15898 | 53.3%85 | 36.3%86 | 74.9%80 |
| 19-20 | 20-11 | #26 | 15.893 | 117.099 | 101.259 | 10.197 | +6767 | +149 | 31.9%82 | -951 | 51.6%70 | 34.7%71 | 75.0%86 |
| 18-1910 | 23-12 | #41 | 13.988 | 116.696 | 102.764 | 10.193 | +2954 | +448 | 29.8%62 | -3063 | 52.7%70 | 36.4%78 | 73.9%80 |
| 17-18 | 14-19 | #91 | 7.574 | 117.194 | 109.630 | 7.587 | +16689 | -3227 | 34.1%91 | +769 | 54.3%85 | 37.5%83 | 69.5%28 |
| 16-17 | 19-15 | #74 | 8.879 | 111.687 | 102.863 | 8.085 | +344 | +1157 | 31.8%74 | -1454 | 52.5%72 | 37.9%84 | 68.8%37 |
| 15-167 | 22-11 | #23 | 19.094 | 114.593 | 95.593 | 9.394 | +2854 | +2769 | 31.9%69 | -9393 | 51.3%65 | 37.4%86 | 71.7%68 |
| 14-157 | 22-12 | #23 | 17.794 | 110.187 | 92.496 | 9.895 | +13885 | -3522 | 35.6%87 | -4073 | 48.1%35 | 33.3%38 | 74.4%93 |
| 13-1411 | 20-13 | #13 | 21.297 | 119.799 | 98.585 | 8.289 | +23097 | -3826 | 37.6%94 | -6887 | 51.1%67 | 35.0%56 | 73.5%86 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
55.3%#102
Effective FG %
52.5%#73
3-Point %
37.9%#50
3PAR
37.3%#152
FTAR
34.9%#183
Assist %
62.4%#12
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
33.0%#236
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
27.2%#152
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
19 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0782D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.839155.1% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.479427.9% of shots
Late 21s+1.193817.0% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0335Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.763351.0% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.315126.3% of shots
Late 21s+1.322122.7% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 343 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 16-17. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 16-17. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.