Lafayette12-20

PatriotCoach: Mike McGarvey

12-20NET#276

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Caleb Williams	1,423	582	71.0%	−0.150	+2.766	+2.834	+4.088	+2.372	+1.724	−10.66	+1.434	−0.248	−1.330	−2.462
Andrew Phillips	1,344	661	67.0%	+7.780	+3.770	−4.070	+3.384	−1.538	−1.774	−8.710	+1.434	+5.092	−0.542	−15.298
Alex Chaikin	1,318	688	65.7%	+19.898	+15.4100	−4.472	+6.198	+0.858	−2.786	+11.696	−2.778	+0.960	+0.052	+0.148
Justin Vander Baan	1,299	706	64.8%	+20.898	+9.192	−11.794	+3.886	−4.514	−4.494	+2.366	−3.382	+9.8100	+0.356	−8.188
Mark Butler	1,179	827	58.8%	−0.350	+0.252	+0.546	−1.436	+6.094	+1.528	−1.146	−2.374	+0.252	−1.526	+4.624
Ryan Pettit	923	1,083	46.0%	+5.472	−8.712	−14.196	−6.76	+1.362	+0.344	+5.280	−4.890	+1.364	+5.098	−6.080
Luka Savicevic	859	1,147	42.8%	−2.840	+8.088	+10.86	+5.494	−3.224	−1.470	+0.354	+6.44	−0.744	−0.248	+7.612
Misha Bednostin	463	1,543	23.1%	−22.64	−15.44	+7.214	−6.66	+6.494	+4.82	−9.68	+0.544	−7.44	−1.526	+6.716
Malik Rasul	397	1,609	19.8%	+10.686	+4.876	−5.878	−0.346	+2.574	−0.658	+3.068	−3.382	−3.618	+3.796	+2.934
TJ Berger	281	1,725	14.0%	−19.26	−13.46	+5.820	−5.98	−6.96	+0.738	+1.460	+3.616	+2.474	−2.614	−4.876
Devin Hines	229	1,776	11.4%	−28.62	−16.94	+11.64	−9.42	−3.818	+1.626	+5.682	+0.642	−5.98	−3.110	+22.10
Joshua Wyche	196	1,810	9.8%	−33.12	−11.78	+21.50	−3.022	−3.720	+3.48	+6.184	+5.94	−16.12	−1.330	+14.24

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Caleb Williams	1,423	582	71.0%	-2.342	103.936	106.252	51.5%50	25.3%28	17.4%44	28.1%44	50.7%50	72.3%66	16.2%42	26.5%58
Andrew Phillips	1,344	661	67.0%	0.246	104.338	104.056	51.5%50	24.1%24	16.3%52	28.3%44	50.7%50	74.0%74	16.4%44	22.3%72
Alex Chaikin	1,318	688	65.7%	4.554	108.448	103.858	52.6%56	24.9%26	15.9%56	35.1%64	49.3%56	72.7%66	16.5%46	27.2%56
Justin Vander Baan	1,299	706	64.8%	5.056	106.342	101.364	51.8%52	22.9%20	15.3%60	31.9%56	49.1%56	75.9%80	16.6%46	24.3%66
Mark Butler	1,179	827	58.8%	-2.442	103.134	105.654	49.8%40	27.0%34	17.5%44	30.6%52	49.3%56	72.4%66	15.9%42	29.1%50
Ryan Pettit	923	1,083	46.0%	0.448	98.426	98.072	46.8%28	25.2%28	17.0%46	33.9%60	47.7%64	73.1%68	19.1%64	24.0%66
Luka Savicevic	859	1,147	42.8%	-4.040	107.646	111.638	53.5%60	22.7%20	16.1%54	31.2%54	54.0%34	72.0%64	16.4%44	31.7%42
Misha Bednostin	463	1,543	23.1%	-19.718	91.214	110.940	45.4%24	29.3%44	20.5%24	23.8%30	50.6%50	66.8%42	15.3%38	32.3%40
Malik Rasul	397	1,609	19.8%	6.158	106.944	100.766	50.1%46	26.5%32	16.4%52	33.4%60	47.6%64	69.5%52	19.5%66	29.5%48
TJ Berger	281	1,725	14.0%	-18.820	91.614	110.440	45.4%24	18.7%12	17.5%44	32.3%56	53.3%36	74.5%74	14.3%30	23.0%70
Devin Hines	229	1,776	11.4%	-27.610	88.110	115.728	42.1%14	21.3%16	18.3%36	36.1%66	50.8%50	67.2%42	13.8%26	46.9%14
Joshua Wyche	196	1,810	9.8%	-32.38	92.516	124.814	47.7%32	21.3%16	19.9%26	36.6%68	55.6%26	57.8%12	15.4%38	40.0%24

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Caleb Williams	1,423	582	71.0%	-2.244	101.130	103.458	47.6%32	23.0%20	15.6%58	38.7%72	49.2%56	72.5%66	17.4%52	28.9%52
Andrew Phillips	1,344	661	67.0%	-7.434	100.630	108.048	48.2%34	25.5%30	18.0%40	37.0%68	49.3%56	69.0%50	16.9%48	37.5%28
Alex Chaikin	1,318	688	65.7%	-15.324	92.916	108.246	46.4%28	24.1%24	18.6%36	23.5%30	52.0%44	71.8%62	16.5%46	27.2%56
Justin Vander Baan	1,299	706	64.8%	-15.822	97.122	112.934	48.0%32	27.4%36	19.7%28	29.6%48	52.3%42	66.1%38	16.3%44	32.4%40
Mark Butler	1,179	827	58.8%	-2.144	102.934	105.054	51.2%48	21.0%16	16.0%54	31.7%54	51.6%46	72.3%66	17.4%52	24.5%64
Ryan Pettit	923	1,083	46.0%	-5.038	107.144	112.136	53.5%60	24.0%24	16.7%48	28.7%46	52.5%40	71.8%62	14.2%30	30.0%46
Luka Savicevic	859	1,147	42.8%	-1.146	99.728	100.866	48.1%34	25.9%30	17.4%44	31.0%52	47.6%64	72.6%66	16.6%46	24.1%66
Misha Bednostin	463	1,543	23.1%	2.952	106.644	103.758	52.0%54	22.9%20	15.7%56	33.4%60	50.1%50	74.2%74	16.9%48	25.6%62
Malik Rasul	397	1,609	19.8%	-4.440	102.132	106.550	50.5%46	24.1%24	17.0%46	30.5%52	50.9%50	73.1%70	15.8%40	26.6%58
TJ Berger	281	1,725	14.0%	0.448	104.940	104.656	51.2%48	25.6%30	16.8%48	30.9%52	49.7%56	72.1%64	16.9%48	27.9%54
Devin Hines	229	1,776	11.4%	0.948	105.040	104.156	51.4%50	25.1%28	16.7%48	30.5%52	50.2%50	73.1%68	16.9%48	24.8%64
Joshua Wyche	196	1,810	9.8%	0.948	104.238	103.358	50.7%46	25.0%26	16.5%50	30.5%52	49.6%56	73.9%74	16.7%46	25.8%60

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.