Lehigh12-18

PatriotCoach: Brett Reed

12-18NET#238

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tyler Whitney-Sidney	1,407	491	74.2%	−3.238	−1.642	+1.740	−1.238	−4.318	−2.684	+5.480	+4.910	−3.322	+3.894	−9.590
Burke Chebuhar	1,090	808	57.5%	−1.744	+0.552	+2.138	+1.466	−2.232	−0.150	−0.748	+1.632	+4.186	−3.310	−5.678
Cam Gillus	1,042	856	54.9%	+4.970	−1.144	−5.978	−2.228	−0.052	−2.278	+7.286	−3.280	+1.364	+0.356	−7.184
Joshua Ingram	1,040	858	54.8%	+15.492	+9.090	−6.580	+4.690	−0.052	+0.442	+4.376	−4.286	+4.788	−2.416	+0.346
Dominic Parolin	1,006	892	53.0%	−2.342	−2.936	−0.652	−2.426	+1.968	−0.758	−9.012	−0.656	+0.152	−0.248	+1.640
Bube Momah	934	964	49.2%	−8.124	−5.126	+2.934	+0.454	−4.418	+3.210	+8.790	−0.354	−3.718	−1.036	−3.970
Keith Higgins Jr.	894	1,004	47.1%	−9.220	−4.230	+5.024	−0.544	−2.628	+1.230	−3.134	+0.940	−3.322	+0.662	+9.98
Jalin Sinclair	627	1,271	33.0%	−19.46	−9.112	+10.38	−3.022	−1.636	+1.330	−8.912	+4.114	−4.216	−0.544	+11.16
Nasir Whitlock	562	1,336	29.6%	+3.866	+6.782	+2.934	+1.566	+10.1100	+1.428	−2.438	+0.246	+3.784	−3.112	+6.218
Ben Knostman	552	1,346	29.1%	+17.996	+4.072	−13.996	−1.040	+0.858	−1.874	+4.978	−5.390	−0.646	+5.6100	−2.462
Jayshen Saigal	144	1,754	7.6%	+3.664	+0.954	−2.864	+0.556	−2.232	−2.684	+7.386	+2.524	+2.776	+2.686	−12.394
JT Tan	126	1,772	6.6%	+14.392	+17.4100	+3.132	+7.398	+13.6100	+1.328	−15.62	+5.56	+6.496	+1.372	+14.72

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tyler Whitney-Sidney	1,407	491	74.2%	-2.142	102.434	104.556	50.1%46	23.0%22	16.3%50	33.6%60	53.3%36	73.3%70	18.9%64	26.9%56
Burke Chebuhar	1,090	808	57.5%	-2.042	103.036	104.954	51.0%50	23.1%22	17.0%46	31.9%56	52.7%38	76.1%80	16.5%46	27.1%56
Cam Gillus	1,042	856	54.9%	0.948	102.334	101.464	49.4%42	24.1%24	16.0%52	35.5%64	50.6%48	74.9%74	18.0%58	26.4%58
Joshua Ingram	1,040	858	54.8%	5.756	106.844	101.264	52.5%58	24.1%24	17.2%44	34.2%62	50.2%50	76.3%80	16.8%50	29.6%46
Dominic Parolin	1,006	892	53.0%	-2.342	101.432	103.756	49.3%40	25.0%26	16.7%48	28.1%46	51.7%42	74.3%74	17.8%56	30.3%44
Bube Momah	934	964	49.2%	-5.338	100.230	105.552	50.6%48	21.8%18	18.6%34	36.8%68	51.9%42	72.4%66	17.4%54	27.6%54
Keith Higgins Jr.	894	1,004	47.1%	-6.236	100.630	106.748	50.1%46	22.7%20	17.7%42	30.6%52	52.5%40	72.5%66	18.2%60	34.9%32
Jalin Sinclair	627	1,271	33.0%	-14.324	96.724	111.038	48.4%38	23.0%22	17.9%40	26.3%38	54.8%28	71.4%60	17.6%54	37.0%28
Nasir Whitlock	562	1,336	29.6%	1.548	107.546	106.050	51.4%52	31.0%52	18.0%40	30.5%52	52.2%40	76.9%82	15.7%42	33.8%34
Ben Knostman	552	1,346	29.1%	11.466	105.642	94.278	49.7%42	24.7%26	15.8%54	35.7%66	48.2%60	73.9%72	21.8%80	27.8%52
Jayshen Saigal	144	1,754	7.6%	2.150	103.638	101.562	50.8%48	22.1%18	14.6%64	39.0%72	54.3%30	76.8%82	20.3%72	18.1%82
JT Tan	126	1,772	6.6%	12.268	119.174	106.948	57.2%76	36.8%74	18.3%38	17.8%16	57.2%20	80.4%90	19.1%64	43.3%18

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tyler Whitney-Sidney	1,407	491	74.2%	1.148	104.038	102.860	51.3%50	27.3%36	19.0%32	28.3%46	48.5%58	76.7%82	15.1%38	36.5%28
Burke Chebuhar	1,090	808	57.5%	-0.346	102.534	102.860	49.6%42	25.3%28	17.1%46	32.6%58	51.1%46	71.9%64	19.8%68	32.7%38
Cam Gillus	1,042	856	54.9%	-3.940	103.436	107.348	51.6%52	24.1%24	18.2%38	28.2%46	53.8%34	73.5%70	17.7%56	33.5%34
Joshua Ingram	1,040	858	54.8%	-9.830	97.926	107.646	47.9%36	24.1%24	16.8%48	29.9%50	54.4%30	71.5%62	19.2%66	29.3%48
Dominic Parolin	1,006	892	53.0%	-0.046	104.340	104.356	51.7%54	23.1%22	17.4%44	37.1%68	52.3%40	74.2%74	18.0%58	28.7%50
Bube Momah	934	964	49.2%	2.752	105.342	102.660	50.2%46	26.1%32	15.5%56	28.2%46	52.2%40	76.2%80	18.4%60	31.5%42
Keith Higgins Jr.	894	1,004	47.1%	3.152	104.840	101.762	50.7%48	25.3%28	16.4%50	33.7%60	51.6%44	75.8%78	17.6%54	25.0%62
Jalin Sinclair	627	1,271	33.0%	5.156	105.842	100.764	51.4%52	24.6%26	16.6%48	35.2%64	50.7%48	75.6%78	18.1%58	26.0%58
Nasir Whitlock	562	1,336	29.6%	-2.342	100.832	103.158	50.0%42	20.9%16	16.6%48	33.0%58	51.9%42	73.2%70	18.9%64	27.6%54
Ben Knostman	552	1,346	29.1%	-6.536	101.632	108.246	50.7%48	23.9%24	17.5%42	30.8%52	53.6%34	74.5%74	16.2%46	30.2%44
Jayshen Saigal	144	1,754	7.6%	-1.544	102.736	104.256	50.4%46	24.3%26	17.2%44	31.7%56	51.8%42	74.1%74	17.7%56	30.4%44
JT Tan	126	1,772	6.6%	-2.242	101.632	103.856	49.9%42	23.2%22	16.9%46	33.4%60	51.7%44	73.9%72	17.8%56	28.6%50

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.