Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
WCC
Loyola Marymount logo

LMU

11-18NET#243Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #178Coach: Stan Johnson
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
LChattanooga logoWPHWLittle Rock logoLFlorida St. logoWSMU logoWPrairie View A&M logoLGrand Canyon logoWLong Beach St. logoWTulsa logoLNew Mexico St. logoLNevada logoWBellarmine logoLSan Francisco logoLSan Diego logoWPortland logoWPepperdine logoLSaint Mary's logoLGonzaga logoLSan Diego logoLSanta Clara logoLSaint Mary's logoLBYU logoLPortland logoLSanta Clara logoLPacific logoLBYU logoWPacific logoWPacific logoLBYU logo

Team Stats

29 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-7.118
  • Offensive Rating104.037
  • Defensive Rating111.215
  • Pace66.646
  • Effective FG%52.1%74
  • Off Rebound Pct24.4%18
  • Turnover Pct19.9%31
  • FT Attempt Rate32.0%68

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct37.9%25
  • Point Margin / Game-4.817
  • Points / Game69.338
  • Points Allowed / Game74.117
  • 1st Half Margin-3.911
  • 2nd Half Margin-0.929
  • Avg Largest Lead8.418
  • Avg Largest Deficit14.215

Box Score

  • Points / Game69.338
  • Rebounds / Game29.72
  • Assists / Game11.113
  • ORebs / Game7.913
  • DRebs / Game21.83
  • Steals / Game5.418
  • Blocks / Game1.72
  • Turnovers / Game13.331
  • PFs / Game17.826

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game24.834
  • FGAs / Game54.59
  • Field Goal Pct45.4%72
  • 2PMs / Game17.537
  • 2PAs / Game33.526
  • 2-Point Pct52.3%73
  • 3PMs / Game7.245
  • 3PAs / Game21.037
  • 3-Point Pct34.5%63
  • FTMs / Game12.656
  • FTAs / Game17.449
  • Free Throw Pct71.9%54

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s50.5%46
  • % Pts from 3s31.3%49
  • % Pts from FTs18.1%58
  • Paint Pts / Game22.665
  • % Pts in Paint32.6%65
  • Fast Break Pts / Game4.939
  • % Pts on Fast Break7.0%38
  • Points off TOVs / Game12.553
  • % Pts off TOVs18.0%56
  • 1st Half Pts / Game31.725
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game37.050

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %55.8%74
  • Points / Shot1.2773
  • 3-Point Att Rate38.5%56
  • Assist Pct45.0%13
  • Assists / 100 Poss16.711
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.84x13
  • PF Drawn / Game18.282

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%54.7%4
  • Opp True Shooting %58.8%3
  • Opp Field Goal Pct48.1%4
  • Opp 2-Point Pct55.0%5
  • Opp 3-Point Pct36.0%16
  • Opp 3PA Rate36.4%63
  • Opp FT Att Rate31.9%37
  • Opp Points / Shot1.345

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game74.117
  • Paint Pts Allowed28.36
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed7.813
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed15.114
  • Opp Assist Pct55.2%19
  • TOVs Forced / Game12.343

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct72.7%62
  • Turnovers Forced Pct18.5%44
  • Steal Pct8.2%19
  • Block Pct2.6%2
  • Hakeem Pct10.8%5
  • PF Efficiency1.01x60
  • Steals / PF0.31x11
  • Blocks / PF0.10x2

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 358 D-I teams
  • #97eFG%52.1%
  • #101TS%55.2%
  • #114SOS2.2
  • #116FTAR32.0%
  • #1313P%34.5%
  • #154Adj ORtg105.2
  • #157Opp OREB%27.4%
  • #162Opp TOV%19.0%
Where they rank worstof 358 D-I teams
  • #349Opp eFG%54.6%
  • #315Opp 3P%36.0%
  • #311AST%45.0%
  • #305Adj DRtg110.5
  • #295OREB%24.7%
  • #294Pts Diff-138
  • #291REB Diff-77
  • #269TOV%19.9%
Game Log
Loading game log…
D. DouglasJr6'7"+0.85961.8%8222.5%7810.84.51.133.3%66.7%
E. ScottSr6'6"+0.75457.8%7028.8%9617.46.43.015.6%77.6%
J. QuintanaSr6'2"+0.33961.9%8218.4%5213.13.01.841.8%91.9%
K. LeaupepeJr6'6"+0.33758.8%7418.8%559.24.80.838.6%75.9%
C. SheltonSr6'2"+0.02651.6%4016.4%388.42.92.327.9%59.0%
K. MarbleJr6'5"-0.51154.4%5415.6%324.92.60.732.6%56.5%
J. AndersonSo6'3"-0.9553.8%5121.5%738.41.31.733.3%75.0%
A. MerkviladzeSo6'8"-1.1349.3%2916.1%355.23.30.532.4%66.7%
G. HarrisSo6'6"48.2%2522.3%772.01.50.40.0%75.0%
Q. Jackson Jr.Sr6'3"40.5%1112.6%150.80.30.050.0%50.0%
D. Elliott IVFr6'3"33.3%733.2%982.00.40.025.0%0.0%
L. LewisFr6'6"33.7%711.6%121.11.70.616.7%40.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Loyola Marymount logo25-2615-17#1670.254107.237107.0700.365-5324+226327.1%16+64552.8%6434.9%6570.4%29
Loyola Marymount logo24-2517-15#168-0.853105.036105.8661.673-1338+266522.8%4-216050.8%4233.4%4172.4%54
Loyola Marymount logo23-2412-19#188-2.048108.362110.327-0.861+7370+649129.7%54+691052.1%6936.8%9373.0%66
Loyola Marymount logo22-2319-12#1243.666110.578106.9422.873+13689+879630.9%68+431953.3%8336.5%8467.1%12
Loyola Marymount logo21-2211-18#243-5.332105.257110.5152.268-7717-34324.7%18+193352.1%7434.5%6371.9%54
Loyola Marymount logo19-2011-21#217-3.738101.946105.6283.773+2153-73927.5%41+561351.8%7430.9%1668.1%23
Loyola Marymount logo18-1922-12#1353.962104.244100.3760.462+9574-67930.8%72-628149.9%3332.0%1674.6%88
Loyola Marymount logo17-1811-20#246-6.730107.358114.090.766+1749-382334.4%93-125549.8%3134.8%4771.0%47
Loyola Marymount logo16-1715-15#182-1.048103.648104.7501.667-2235+206430.8%64-528150.6%4735.3%5462.0%1
Loyola Marymount logo15-1613-17#230-5.135102.842107.9290.461-10916-233229.6%47-859347.8%2233.9%3872.6%81
Loyola Marymount logo14-157-23#274-8.62299.731108.3174.778-1639-92233.7%72+661146.7%1935.4%6471.0%70
Loyola Marymount logo13-1412-19#192-1.745106.052107.7373.672-8122-561333.1%66-528047.4%2129.4%376.2%97

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
55.2%#97
Effective FG %
52.1%#93
3-Point %
34.5%#128
3PAR
38.5%#156
FTAR
32.0%#113
Assist %
45.0%#311

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
37.6%#107
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
20.6%#51
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

10 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 30.6% of shots at 1.16 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0930.6%1.16Middle (11–20s): 33.8% of shots at 1.03 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0433.8%1.03Late (21s+): 35.6% of shots at 1.02 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9735.6%1.02SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 34.9% of shots at 1.21 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0734.9%1.21Middle (11–20s): 40.5% of shots at 0.95 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0240.5%0.95Late (21s+): 24.6% of shots at 0.91 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9524.6%0.91SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

10 games
Created byFinished by
Eli Scott → Joe Quintana: 5 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Eli Scott → Cam Shelton: 6 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 1 from three)Eli Scott → Keli Leaupepe: 5 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 3 from three)Eli Scott → Kwane Marble: 8 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Eli Scott → Dameane Douglas: 6 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)Eli Scott → Alex Merkviladze: 4 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 2 from three)Cam Shelton → Joe Quintana: 11 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 11 from three)Cam Shelton → Eli Scott: 3 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 0 from three)Cam Shelton → Keli Leaupepe: 4 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 3 from three)Joe Quintana → Eli Scott: 5 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 1 from three)Joe Quintana → Cam Shelton: 3 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 2 from three)Jalin Anderson → Eli Scott: 5 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 0 from three)Lamaj Lewis → Joe Quintana: 4 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Kwane Marble → Eli Scott: 3 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 1 from three)Scott34 astShelton18 astQuintana8 astAnderson5 astLewisMarbleQuintana20 madeScott16 madeShelton9 madeLeaupepe9 madeMarble8 madeDouglas6 madeMerkviladze
Scott is the least-assisted finisher — 72% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 21-22. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 21-22. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.