Miami OH29-2

MACCoach: Travis Steele

29-2NET#75

Poss2,138

Net Rtg14.670

ORtg120.674

DRtg106.154

Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,138	988	14.670	120.674	106.154	58.8%78	25.8%34	14.3%62	39.5%64	51.1%50	71.4%56	17.0%56	29.7%56
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersSkaljacL. Skaljac	457	228	14.770	121.776	107.150	60.6%84	23.5%24	13.4%68	33.6%52	52.5%44	69.0%46	18.4%66	23.5%74
ElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersSkaljacL. SkaljacAtlasonA. Atlason	155	65	14.870	127.484	112.638	58.7%78	29.2%48	11.6%78	60.3%92	52.4%44	70.9%54	13.7%32	43.9%22
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersIpsaroE. Ipsaro	103	56	31.690	124.782	93.080	64.5%92	18.4%12	13.5%66	25.6%30	44.1%80	76.3%76	15.0%42	25.8%68
ElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersAtlasonA. AtlasonPerryT. Perry	67	33	-0.644	117.868	118.424	55.2%64	27.3%40	14.9%56	29.3%40	48.0%64	55.3%8	13.5%30	13.5%94
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerByersB. ByersIpsaroE. IpsaroSkaljacL. Skaljac	61	24	33.490	103.532	70.198	53.8%58	8.7%2	18.1%32	69.2%96	39.0%92	82.8%92	24.0%90	9.8%96
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersPerryT. Perry	60	26	5.856	117.566	111.740	55.3%64	23.1%24	14.9%58	46.8%78	51.0%50	67.9%40	12.8%26	32.7%46
SuderP. SuderByersB. ByersAtlasonA. AtlasonKirbyJ. KirbyPerryT. Perry	60	27	-15.922	104.434	120.322	51.9%48	20.6%18	16.6%44	13.0%6	60.7%14	76.7%76	12.0%22	35.7%40
ElmerE. ElmerByersB. ByersSkaljacL. SkaljacAtlasonA. AtlasonKirbyJ. Kirby	54	21	4.654	113.156	108.548	59.5%80	0.0%0	11.1%82	62.2%92	45.7%74	64.5%28	13.1%28	46.8%18
ElmerE. ElmerByersB. ByersAtlasonA. AtlasonKirbyJ. KirbyPerryT. Perry	52	20	-11.328	115.362	126.612	60.3%82	30.0%50	19.2%24	48.7%80	60.2%14	83.3%94	5.8%4	14.3%92
SuderP. SuderByersB. ByersSkaljacL. SkaljacAtlasonA. AtlasonKirbyJ. Kirby	48	23	10.264	115.562	105.354	60.5%84	14.3%6	10.5%84	42.1%70	51.1%50	69.2%46	19.9%76	15.6%90
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersKirbyJ. Kirby	44	22	24.182	134.894	110.742	51.4%46	33.3%66	4.6%98	80.6%98	60.0%16	70.6%52	22.6%86	25.7%68
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersSkaljacL. SkaljacKirbyJ. Kirby	43	21	38.294	152.8100	114.732	73.0%98	35.7%72	11.6%80	35.1%54	63.2%8	77.8%80	23.8%90	32.4%48
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerByersB. ByersSkaljacL. SkaljacKirbyJ. Kirby	39	17	44.596	132.190	87.688	64.1%92	37.5%76	13.0%70	50.0%82	46.3%72	66.7%32	26.6%96	51.9%12
SuderP. SuderByersB. ByersIpsaroE. IpsaroSkaljacL. SkaljacAtlasonA. Atlason	35	15	21.780	135.494	113.734	75.0%100	18.2%12	14.4%60	46.2%78	53.3%40	77.8%80	8.5%8	43.3%22
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderSkaljacL. SkaljacKirbyJ. Kirby	35	18	30.488	138.696	108.248	67.9%96	35.7%72	14.4%60	50.0%82	47.4%68	76.0%74	7.5%6	26.3%66
ElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersAtlasonA. AtlasonKirbyJ. Kirby	32	16	28.586	126.284	97.772	57.4%74	33.3%66	15.8%50	44.4%74	40.0%90	65.0%28	15.3%44	33.3%44

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.