Miami OH29-2

MACCoach: Travis Steele

29-2NET#75

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Brant Byers	1,700	439	79.5%	−2.640	+1.458	+4.126	−2.030	+0.152	−2.988	+1.660	+1.830	−4.812	+0.762	−6.882
Eian Elmer	1,644	495	76.9%	−0.350	−3.830	−3.568	−0.248	−1.736	+0.736	+11.396	−4.990	−3.220	−0.936	−1.458
Peter Suder	1,611	527	75.4%	+4.368	+10.294	+5.918	+4.992	−2.132	−3.994	−12.74	+2.424	−3.818	−0.248	−1.156
Luke Skaljac	1,448	691	67.7%	+3.062	+2.464	−0.652	+2.980	−1.538	−0.050	+4.374	+1.434	−0.248	+2.890	+3.330
Antwone Woolfolk	1,234	904	57.7%	+10.486	+2.364	−8.188	+1.870	+1.062	−0.558	−3.930	+0.048	+2.274	+4.196	−5.478
Almar Atlason	1,007	1,131	47.1%	−9.518	−4.128	+5.420	+0.152	−5.212	+1.328	+2.164	−0.554	−1.832	−3.38	+5.420
Trey Perry	625	1,513	29.2%	−13.012	−5.522	+7.612	−5.48	+2.776	+0.342	−11.86	+1.334	−3.518	−2.612	−6.080
Justin Kirby	624	1,514	29.2%	−7.724	−4.030	+3.728	−2.724	+2.676	+0.834	+6.584	+1.236	+2.072	−3.18	+0.746
Evan Ipsaro	453	1,686	21.2%	+7.778	−1.144	−8.890	+2.174	−2.230	+2.018	−1.642	−1.362	+5.894	+2.588	+4.226
Tyler Robbins	181	1,958	8.5%	+3.866	+0.654	−3.166	−4.512	+12.5100	+1.920	−7.514	−0.152	+7.598	−1.032	+3.728
Kyle Waltz	143	1,996	6.7%	+11.088	+1.458	−9.692	+1.770	+5.592	+4.92	+6.484	−3.482	+7.398	+1.272	+5.620

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Brant Byers	1,700	439	79.5%	14.068	120.974	106.950	58.4%76	25.9%34	13.7%66	39.8%66	51.5%48	70.4%52	17.2%58	28.4%60
Eian Elmer	1,644	495	76.9%	14.570	119.772	105.254	58.8%78	25.4%32	14.5%60	42.3%70	50.0%58	70.7%52	16.8%56	29.4%56
Peter Suder	1,611	527	75.4%	15.672	123.178	107.550	60.0%82	25.3%32	13.3%68	36.5%58	51.7%46	70.5%52	17.0%56	29.5%56
Luke Skaljac	1,448	691	67.7%	15.572	121.476	105.954	59.8%80	25.3%32	14.3%62	40.9%68	51.6%48	71.3%56	17.9%64	30.8%52
Antwone Woolfolk	1,234	904	57.7%	19.076	121.676	102.662	59.6%80	26.3%34	14.1%62	37.8%62	51.2%50	72.4%60	18.8%68	27.4%62
Almar Atlason	1,007	1,131	47.1%	9.562	118.470	108.946	58.9%78	23.1%24	15.0%56	40.6%66	50.9%50	70.5%52	15.3%44	32.5%48
Trey Perry	625	1,513	29.2%	5.354	116.766	111.440	55.1%62	27.7%40	14.6%60	31.4%44	52.0%44	68.9%44	15.2%42	25.5%68
Justin Kirby	624	1,514	29.2%	9.262	117.868	108.646	56.9%72	27.6%40	14.9%56	44.1%74	52.0%46	72.8%62	14.9%40	30.2%54
Evan Ipsaro	453	1,686	21.2%	20.678	119.772	99.170	60.5%84	24.1%28	15.9%48	38.2%62	50.1%52	76.0%74	19.0%70	33.1%46
Tyler Robbins	181	1,958	8.5%	18.076	121.276	103.260	54.7%62	37.2%76	16.0%48	32.7%48	51.0%50	78.3%82	16.1%50	33.1%46
Kyle Waltz	143	1,996	6.7%	24.884	121.976	97.174	60.5%84	31.0%54	18.9%26	45.5%76	48.0%64	78.2%82	18.1%64	35.0%42

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Brant Byers	1,700	439	79.5%	16.674	119.572	102.862	60.4%82	25.8%32	16.6%42	38.2%62	49.7%58	75.2%72	16.5%52	35.1%40
Eian Elmer	1,644	495	76.9%	14.870	123.580	108.746	59.0%78	27.2%38	13.7%66	30.9%44	54.9%32	73.9%66	17.7%62	30.8%52
Peter Suder	1,611	527	75.4%	11.364	112.956	101.664	55.0%62	27.4%40	17.3%38	49.3%82	49.3%58	74.3%68	17.2%58	30.5%54
Luke Skaljac	1,448	691	67.7%	12.566	119.070	106.552	56.9%72	26.8%38	14.3%62	36.6%58	50.2%52	71.5%58	15.1%42	27.5%62
Antwone Woolfolk	1,234	904	57.7%	8.660	119.372	110.742	57.8%74	25.2%32	14.6%60	41.8%70	51.1%50	70.2%50	14.7%38	32.8%46
Almar Atlason	1,007	1,131	47.1%	19.076	122.678	103.560	58.8%78	28.3%44	13.7%66	38.5%62	51.4%48	72.3%60	18.6%68	27.1%64
Trey Perry	625	1,513	29.2%	18.476	122.278	103.858	60.5%84	25.0%28	14.2%62	43.1%72	50.7%52	72.5%62	17.8%62	31.6%50
Justin Kirby	624	1,514	29.2%	16.874	121.876	104.956	59.6%80	25.0%32	14.1%64	37.6%60	50.8%52	70.8%52	18.0%64	29.5%56
Evan Ipsaro	453	1,686	21.2%	12.968	120.874	107.948	58.4%76	26.3%34	13.9%64	39.8%66	51.4%48	70.2%50	16.5%52	28.9%58
Tyler Robbins	181	1,958	8.5%	14.270	120.674	106.352	59.2%80	24.7%28	14.2%62	40.2%66	51.2%50	70.8%52	17.1%58	29.4%56
Kyle Waltz	143	1,996	6.7%	13.868	120.574	106.752	58.7%78	25.5%32	14.0%64	39.1%64	51.4%48	70.9%54	16.9%56	29.3%56

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.