Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
MAC
Miami OH logo

Miami OH

32-2NET#65Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #197Coach: Travis Steele
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Brant Byers−6.4−1.3+5.1−3.1−0.8−1.9+3.5+2.5−5.4+1.7−2.4
Eian Elmer−1.5−4.9−3.4−1.0−2.1+0.8+11.3−4.4−4.2+0.2+0.2
Peter Suder+0.6+7.6+7.0+3.2−2.8−3.6−10.6+3.6−3.3+0.3+1.0
Luke Skaljac+2.2+1.9−0.3+2.7−1.6+0.2+4.6+1.4−0.0+2.5+4.9
Antwone Woolfolk+7.3+1.2−6.2+1.3+0.2−0.4−2.9+0.6+1.0+4.3−3.6
Almar Atlason−9.2−4.2+4.9+0.2−5.5+1.4+2.4−0.4−1.8−3.1+4.1
Trey Perry−9.1−2.5+6.6−3.6+3.6+0.1−12.7+1.2−1.9−3.3−7.6
Justin Kirby−11.6−6.8+4.8−4.2+1.9+1.1+7.4+1.6+1.3−3.0+2.2
Evan Ipsaro+6.8−3.4−10.2+0.3−1.4+2.1−1.1−2.6+4.3+3.1+4.2
Tyler Robbins+15.3+9.0−6.3+0.7+13.2+0.7−9.5−2.0+8.9−2.6−3.2
Kyle Waltz+18.6+7.7−10.9+5.7+4.5+2.0−4.2−4.7+6.7−0.2−2.1

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Brant Byers16.1122.5106.459.3%26.1%13.6%39.5%51.4%70.6%17.4%28.1%
Eian Elmer17.2121.5104.359.8%25.8%14.3%41.7%49.7%70.8%17.0%28.7%
Peter Suder17.8124.8107.060.8%25.6%13.1%36.0%51.8%71.0%17.1%28.9%
Luke Skaljac18.3123.4105.160.9%25.8%14.1%40.2%51.3%71.9%17.8%30.3%
Antwone Woolfolk20.8123.3102.560.6%26.4%13.9%37.4%51.1%72.4%18.9%27.0%
Almar Atlason12.7120.5107.860.1%23.4%14.8%40.0%50.6%71.0%15.4%30.8%
Trey Perry11.3121.1109.857.6%28.7%14.2%30.2%51.6%70.6%14.7%23.5%
Justin Kirby9.2117.8108.656.9%27.6%14.9%44.1%52.0%72.8%14.9%30.2%
Evan Ipsaro22.9120.197.260.3%25.2%15.8%37.8%48.7%75.3%19.4%32.0%
Tyler Robbins31.2130.899.660.6%38.1%14.7%30.3%49.1%79.7%14.7%25.8%
Kyle Waltz34.3129.795.465.1%30.4%15.9%34.9%46.6%77.9%16.8%26.7%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Brant Byers22.5123.8101.362.4%26.9%15.6%36.0%48.9%76.0%15.7%30.4%
Eian Elmer18.7126.4107.760.8%27.9%13.5%30.3%54.1%75.0%16.9%28.5%
Peter Suder17.2117.2100.057.6%28.4%16.7%46.6%48.1%74.3%16.8%27.9%
Luke Skaljac16.1121.5105.458.3%27.3%14.0%35.7%49.9%71.9%15.3%25.4%
Antwone Woolfolk13.5122.1108.759.3%26.2%14.3%40.3%50.5%71.3%14.6%30.6%
Almar Atlason21.9124.8102.959.9%28.9%13.4%37.6%51.0%72.8%18.5%26.7%
Trey Perry20.4123.5103.161.2%25.1%14.0%42.8%50.5%72.5%18.0%31.1%
Justin Kirby20.8124.6103.861.2%25.8%13.8%36.7%50.4%71.5%17.8%28.0%
Evan Ipsaro16.2123.5107.360.0%26.6%13.6%38.9%51.4%71.0%16.3%27.8%
Tyler Robbins15.9121.8105.959.9%24.8%14.0%39.8%51.1%70.8%17.3%29.0%
Kyle Waltz15.7122.0106.359.5%25.9%13.9%39.1%51.3%71.1%17.0%28.8%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.