North Texas25-9

AmericanCoach: Ross Hodge

25-9NET#66

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Atin Wright	1,583	476	76.9%	−5.232	−5.522	−0.352	−3.418	−3.818	−0.556	−3.234	+0.246	−3.022	+0.966	+4.922
Jasper Floyd	1,527	532	74.1%	+6.576	−4.328	−10.892	−3.618	+4.386	+2.218	+4.676	−1.666	+7.698	+1.982	−10.192
Brenen Lorient	1,323	736	64.3%	−11.316	−0.448	+10.96	−2.426	−0.744	−1.572	+12.296	+1.434	−6.36	−0.740	+14.82
Moulaye Sissoko	1,308	751	63.5%	+17.196	+9.994	−7.384	+5.294	+5.692	−0.556	−12.44	+1.830	+7.898	−0.150	−19.098
Latrell Jossell	1,142	917	55.4%	−9.818	+0.956	+10.76	+3.080	−1.736	+1.132	+3.270	+4.310	−3.420	−0.542	+3.430
Rondel Walker	1,133	926	55.0%	−1.544	−5.622	−4.172	−4.412	−0.546	+0.246	+0.354	−0.758	+1.466	+2.182	+1.740
Grant Newell	1,110	948	53.9%	+0.854	−0.150	−1.054	+0.152	+1.766	+0.640	−9.210	−0.554	−0.744	+0.866	+0.050
Johnathan Massie	986	1,072	47.9%	−7.026	−0.746	+6.318	+0.860	−1.242	+0.146	+1.662	+0.444	−5.410	−2.020	−1.558
Matthew Stone	112	1,946	5.5%	+28.3100	+13.998	−14.496	+12.1100	−10.02	−1.876	+12.596	−11.398	+5.994	−4.64	+0.746

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Atin Wright	1,583	476	76.9%	10.766	110.152	99.468	50.3%46	32.6%58	16.7%48	34.5%62	47.3%66	69.8%54	19.9%70	38.1%26
Jasper Floyd	1,527	532	74.1%	13.670	110.252	96.774	50.2%46	34.6%64	17.4%44	36.5%68	46.9%68	72.5%66	20.2%72	34.3%36
Brenen Lorient	1,323	736	64.3%	7.760	111.254	103.558	50.3%46	33.2%58	16.3%52	39.7%74	47.8%64	68.2%46	19.4%66	42.5%20
Moulaye Sissoko	1,308	751	63.5%	18.176	115.064	96.974	52.9%58	35.6%68	16.7%48	31.0%52	47.9%62	73.4%70	19.7%68	30.3%46
Latrell Jossell	1,142	917	55.4%	7.460	111.856	104.456	52.5%54	32.7%58	17.3%44	36.7%68	49.2%56	69.0%50	19.5%66	38.5%26
Rondel Walker	1,133	926	55.0%	11.166	108.850	97.772	49.2%38	33.3%58	16.9%46	35.4%64	47.0%66	71.2%60	20.6%74	37.7%28
Grant Newell	1,110	948	53.9%	12.268	111.356	99.170	51.2%48	34.2%64	17.1%46	31.1%54	47.0%66	70.2%56	20.1%70	37.0%30
Johnathan Massie	986	1,072	47.9%	8.262	111.054	102.860	51.5%50	32.9%58	16.9%46	36.1%66	47.5%64	67.8%44	18.7%60	36.2%30
Matthew Stone	112	1,946	5.5%	38.694	124.582	85.990	62.6%90	23.9%24	15.1%62	47.1%84	36.6%94	76.1%80	15.4%38	37.6%28

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Atin Wright	1,583	476	76.9%	15.974	115.666	99.768	53.8%62	36.4%72	17.2%44	37.7%70	47.1%66	72.8%68	19.0%64	33.3%38
Jasper Floyd	1,527	532	74.1%	7.160	114.662	107.548	53.8%62	30.3%48	15.2%60	31.9%56	48.4%60	64.9%34	18.3%58	44.4%18
Brenen Lorient	1,323	736	64.3%	19.078	111.656	92.680	52.6%56	34.0%62	17.8%40	27.5%42	46.4%70	74.6%74	20.2%70	27.6%54
Moulaye Sissoko	1,308	751	63.5%	0.948	105.140	104.156	47.7%32	30.0%48	17.2%46	43.3%80	46.1%70	65.6%36	19.8%68	49.2%12
Latrell Jossell	1,142	917	55.4%	17.376	110.954	93.680	49.5%40	34.4%64	16.2%52	33.5%60	44.9%74	72.4%66	20.0%70	35.1%34
Rondel Walker	1,133	926	55.0%	12.768	114.562	101.864	53.5%60	33.8%62	16.7%48	35.1%64	47.7%64	69.8%54	18.5%60	36.0%32
Grant Newell	1,110	948	53.9%	11.466	111.456	100.068	51.1%48	32.6%58	16.6%50	40.3%74	47.5%64	70.9%60	19.3%66	37.0%30
Johnathan Massie	986	1,072	47.9%	15.272	111.756	96.574	50.8%46	34.1%64	16.8%48	34.5%62	47.1%66	73.3%70	20.6%74	37.7%28
Matthew Stone	112	1,946	5.5%	10.364	110.652	100.368	50.5%46	33.9%62	17.0%46	34.7%62	47.9%62	70.2%56	19.9%70	36.9%30

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.