Schedule
L
L
L
WW
W
L
L
W
L
LL
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
LWLLLWWWWWL
LLWWWLLWLLLLWWWLLWWLWLWLLLWWWWWLTeam Stats
32 games- Net Rating-1.147
- Offensive Rating110.248
- Defensive Rating111.349
- Pace69.386
- Effective FG%54.3%90
- Off Rebound Pct25.6%27
- Turnover Pct18.8%67
- FT Attempt Rate35.7%73
Team Stats
32 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating-1.147
- Offensive Rating110.248
- Defensive Rating111.349
- Pace69.386
- Effective FG%54.3%90
- Off Rebound Pct25.6%27
- Turnover Pct18.8%67
- FT Attempt Rate35.7%73
Results & Margin
- Win Pct46.9%46
- Point Margin / Game-0.847
- Points / Game76.382
- Points Allowed / Game77.118
- 1st Half Margin0.354
- 2nd Half Margin-1.139
- Avg Largest Lead10.856
- Avg Largest Deficit9.958
Box Score
- Points / Game76.382
- Rebounds / Game32.113
- Assists / Game17.399
- ORebs / Game8.522
- DRebs / Game23.621
- Steals / Game5.734
- Blocks / Game2.836
- Turnovers / Game13.049
- PFs / Game16.481
Shooting
- FGMs / Game26.065
- FGAs / Game56.535
- Field Goal Pct46.0%81
- 2PMs / Game16.730
- 2PAs / Game31.915
- 2-Point Pct52.3%77
- 3PMs / Game9.388
- 3PAs / Game24.778
- 3-Point Pct37.9%92
- FTMs / Game15.079
- FTAs / Game20.268
- Free Throw Pct74.4%85
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s43.6%9
- % Pts from 3s36.7%82
- % Pts from FTs19.6%64
- Paint Pts / Game25.782
- % Pts in Paint33.6%73
- Fast Break Pts / Game5.968
- % Pts on Fast Break7.8%64
- Points off TOVs / Game13.583
- % Pts off TOVs17.7%75
- 1st Half Pts / Game36.183
- 2nd Half Pts / Game40.285
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %58.4%94
- Points / Shot1.3595
- 3-Point Att Rate43.6%83
- Assist Pct66.6%100
- Assists / 100 Poss25.091
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.33x93
- PF Drawn / Game19.280
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%53.0%20
- Opp True Shooting %56.3%26
- Opp Field Goal Pct46.6%15
- Opp 2-Point Pct53.2%19
- Opp 3-Point Pct35.2%37
- Opp 3PA Rate36.7%69
- Opp FT Att Rate28.0%85
- Opp Points / Shot1.2647
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game77.118
- Paint Pts Allowed32.91
- Fast Break Pts Allowed8.95
- Pts off TOVs Allowed14.711
- Opp Assist Pct55.6%21
- TOVs Forced / Game12.027
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct67.5%10
- Turnovers Forced Pct17.3%13
- Steal Pct8.2%20
- Block Pct4.1%28
- Hakeem Pct12.3%15
- PF Efficiency0.86x96
- Steals / PF0.35x55
- Blocks / PF0.17x45
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 353 D-I teams- #2AST%66.6%
- #21FB Pts Diff-105
- #26TS%57.7%
- #273P%37.9%
- #37eFG%54.3%
- #633PM Diff+47
- #72PO TOV Diff-37
- #96FTAR35.7%
Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
- #2AST%66.6%
- #21FB Pts Diff-105
- #26TS%57.7%
- #273P%37.9%
- #37eFG%54.3%
- #633PM Diff+47
- #72PO TOV Diff-37
- #96FTAR35.7%
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
- #319Opp OREB%32.5%
- #307REB Diff-128
- #294Adj DRtg110.1
- #282Opp eFG%53.0%
- #261OREB%25.6%
- #259Opp TOV%17.4%
- #228Paint Pts %37.1%
- #222Opp 3P%35.2%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2018-19- 1
Southeast Missouri St.SEMO 2017-1812-17OVCMost alike in Opp TOV%, OREB%, 3PA rate89 - 2
Tennessee TechTenn. Tech 2015-1617-12OVCMost alike in Adj O, Adj D, OREB%89 - 3
DePaul 2014-1512-20Big EastMost alike in Adj O, Opp OREB%, 3PA rate86 - 4
Iona 2018-1917-16MAACMost alike in Adj D, Adj O, OREB%86 - 5
La Salle 2016-1715-15A10Most alike in Tempo, TOV%, 3PA rate86 - 6Hartford 2018-1917-15America EastMost alike in Adj O, eFG%, OREB%85
- 7
UMBC 2021-2217-14America EastMost alike in 3PA rate, Tempo, Opp TOV%85 - 8James MadisonJMU 2014-1519-14CAAMost alike in Opp TOV%, OREB%, Tempo85
- 9
Rice 2021-2214-17C-USAMost alike in TOV%, Adj D, 3PA rate83 - 10
East CarolinaECU 2013-1413-17C-USAMost alike in TOV%, Opp eFG%, Adj D82
Schedule
Loading the schedule
BrailenNeelyJr
BradenNorrisFr
JaevinCumberlandJr
JordanNoblesSr
BradBrechtingJr
XavierHill-MaisJrTJTray MaddoxJr.Fr
KarmariNewmanSo
JamesBeckSoSSStanScottSo
BSBabatundeSowunmiFr
KJKenny PittmanJr.Fr
| B. NeelyBrailen Neely | Jr | 5'9" | +1.591 | – | – | 44.1%15 | 19.1%58 | 6.0 | 2.3 | 5.7 | 20.0% | 50.0% |
| B. NorrisBraden Norris | Fr | 5'11" | +1.084 | – | – | 68.3%92 | 12.9%16 | 8.4 | 2.8 | 5.3 | 47.8% | 74.7% |
| J. CumberlandJaevin Cumberland | Jr | 6'3" | +0.877 | – | – | 60.9%80 | 20.9%70 | 17.2 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 39.9% | 86.7% |
| J. NoblesJordan Nobles | Sr | 6'9" | +0.775 | – | – | 60.6%79 | 11.2%10 | 6.6 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 33.3% | 75.0% |
| B. BrechtingBrad Brechting | Jr | 6'11" | +0.670 | – | – | 64.1%87 | 21.4%74 | 9.5 | 5.9 | 1.2 | 27.3% | 77.2% |
| X. Hill-MaisXavier Hill-Mais | Jr | 6'7" | +0.359 | – | – | 60.1%77 | 29.2%96 | 18.3 | 7.2 | 2.5 | 32.0% | 69.8% |
| T. Maddox Jr.Tray Maddox Jr. | Fr | 6'5" | -0.142 | – | – | 52.1%39 | 18.6%54 | 6.7 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 39.0% | 71.4% |
| K. NewmanKarmari Newman | So | 6'4" | -0.141 | – | – | 54.7%53 | 21.2%72 | 9.4 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 33.9% | 76.2% |
| J. BeckJames Beck | So | 6'8" | -0.236 | – | – | 49.5%28 | 17.4%45 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 20.0% | 58.9% |
| S. ScottStan Scott | So | 6'3" | – | – | – | 50.7%33 | 21.4%74 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| B. SowunmiBabatunde Sowunmi | Fr | 6'10" | – | – | – | 34.7%7 | 9.5%6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| K. Pittman Jr.Kenny Pittman Jr. | Fr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 44.0%15 | 11.3%10 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 22.2% | 100.0% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 16-16 | #170 | 0.555 | 115.879 | 115.219 | 0.868 | -4328 | -6210 | 31.6%57 | -2463 | 53.3%71 | 34.8%63 | 75.0%79 |
| 24-25 | 16-18 | #188 | -2.346 | 107.750 | 110.138 | -0.465 | +5660 | -3819 | 34.7%85 | +3925 | 50.1%32 | 30.5%7 | 69.9%29 |
| 23-2414 | 24-12 | #117 | 4.065 | 110.472 | 106.454 | -0.960 | +4658 | +1758 | 30.2%61 | -749 | 51.9%63 | 35.5%74 | 75.1%84 |
| 22-23 | 13-19 | #287 | -8.720 | 104.544 | 113.38 | -2.739 | -1972 | -5114 | 24.4%12 | -9992 | 49.6%30 | 30.8%7 | 77.6%96 |
| 21-22 | 20-12 | #158 | 1.759 | 105.660 | 103.952 | -4.728 | -2836 | -1236 | 31.6%80 | -7987 | 50.2%47 | 30.2%7 | 79.4%99 |
| 19-20 | 14-19 | #246 | -6.229 | 98.325 | 104.537 | -3.834 | +148 | -798 | 29.1%57 | +4917 | 48.4%26 | 29.6%5 | 68.9%29 |
| 18-19 | 16-17 | #193 | -1.747 | 108.973 | 110.615 | -1.648 | -11911 | +5685 | 25.7%24 | +2631 | 54.9%92 | 38.5%96 | 74.2%83 |
| 17-18 | 19-14 | #169 | 0.252 | 109.370 | 109.132 | -2.936 | +1449 | +3874 | 28.0%40 | +2927 | 52.0%61 | 35.2%53 | 77.0%95 |
| 16-17 | 25-9 | #108 | 4.468 | 104.654 | 100.276 | -4.224 | +6566 | +2063 | 29.0%42 | -2764 | 51.5%60 | 33.4%28 | 76.2%94 |
| 15-16 | 23-12 | #74 | 9.279 | 115.995 | 106.736 | -1.251 | +8873 | +3977 | 31.2%63 | -3366 | 53.1%86 | 39.8%97 | 77.0%98 |
| 14-15 | 14-17 | #184 | -1.247 | 109.285 | 110.48 | 1.166 | +345 | +957 | 30.4%41 | +5019 | 53.2%88 | 36.2%76 | 68.6%44 |
| 13-14 | 11-20 | #201 | -2.742 | 109.573 | 112.211 | 3.271 | -1675 | 047 | 25.3%5 | -8893 | 50.8%64 | 37.0%80 | 73.0%81 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
57.7%#26
Effective FG %
54.3%#36
3-Point %
37.9%#25
3PAR
43.6%#56
FTAR
35.7%#94
Assist %
66.6%#2
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
32.8%#245
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
24.0%#126
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
27 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot1.1193D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.742840.6% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.439632.2% of shots
Late 21s+1.298327.2% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0818Allowed, D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.824348.0% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.302733.3% of shots
Late 21s+1.33718.7% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 352 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.