Schedule
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
WW
L
W
W
LLWWLWWWLW
L
WWWLWLLWWWWWLWLWLLWWWLWWLLWWLWWWLWLTeam Stats
36 games- Net Rating8.581
- Offensive Rating114.157
- Defensive Rating105.682
- Pace68.685
- Effective FG%53.3%79
- Off Rebound Pct31.0%72
- Turnover Pct17.6%84
- FT Attempt Rate31.7%35
Team Stats
36 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating8.581
- Offensive Rating114.157
- Defensive Rating105.682
- Pace68.685
- Effective FG%53.3%79
- Off Rebound Pct31.0%72
- Turnover Pct17.6%84
- FT Attempt Rate31.7%35
Results & Margin
- Win Pct63.9%78
- Point Margin / Game5.982
- Points / Game78.384
- Points Allowed / Game72.456
- 1st Half Margin2.979
- 2nd Half Margin2.985
- Avg Largest Lead14.583
- Avg Largest Deficit8.968
Box Score
- Points / Game78.384
- Rebounds / Game35.051
- Assists / Game15.486
- ORebs / Game10.357
- DRebs / Game24.743
- Steals / Game6.979
- Blocks / Game4.284
- Turnovers / Game12.171
- PFs / Game19.820
Shooting
- FGMs / Game27.481
- FGAs / Game59.975
- Field Goal Pct45.8%72
- 2PMs / Game18.455
- 2PAs / Game34.631
- 2-Point Pct53.1%83
- 3PMs / Game9.083
- 3PAs / Game25.286
- 3-Point Pct35.7%64
- FTMs / Game14.563
- FTAs / Game19.045
- Free Throw Pct76.3%91
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s47.0%27
- % Pts from 3s34.5%72
- % Pts from FTs18.5%42
- Paint Pts / Game18.228
- % Pts in Paint23.2%24
- Fast Break Pts / Game5.780
- % Pts on Fast Break7.3%74
- Points off TOVs / Game8.621
- % Pts off TOVs11.0%17
- 1st Half Pts / Game35.773
- 2nd Half Pts / Game38.051
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %57.4%81
- Points / Shot1.3176
- 3-Point Att Rate42.1%80
- Assist Pct56.4%79
- Assists / 100 Poss22.569
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.28x86
- PF Drawn / Game18.559
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%50.3%59
- Opp True Shooting %55.3%41
- Opp Field Goal Pct43.3%66
- Opp 2-Point Pct48.4%70
- Opp 3-Point Pct35.6%40
- Opp 3PA Rate39.4%30
- Opp FT Att Rate36.3%32
- Opp Points / Shot1.2839
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game72.456
- Paint Pts Allowed12.786
- Fast Break Pts Allowed2.977
- Pts off TOVs Allowed6.887
- Opp Assist Pct51.0%59
- TOVs Forced / Game13.465
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct73.2%76
- Turnovers Forced Pct19.5%46
- Steal Pct10.0%63
- Block Pct6.2%76
- Hakeem Pct16.2%74
- PF Efficiency1.07x26
- Steals / PF0.35x61
- Blocks / PF0.21x71
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 280 D-I teams- #7FB Pts %14.3%
- #49Adj ORtg113.9
- #60REB Diff+107
- #60Pts Diff+211
- #66TS%56.8%
- #74AST%56.4%
- #74Paint Pts %43.9%
- #76eFG%53.3%
Where they rank bestof 280 D-I teams
- #7FB Pts %14.3%
- #49Adj ORtg113.9
- #60REB Diff+107
- #60Pts Diff+211
- #66TS%56.8%
- #74AST%56.4%
- #74Paint Pts %43.9%
- #76eFG%53.3%
Where they rank worstof 280 D-I teams
- #229FTAR31.7%
- #212Opp 3P%35.6%
- #143Opp eFG%50.3%
- #1273P%35.7%
- #121Opp TOV%19.4%
- #114Adj DRtg102.9
- #101TOV%17.6%
- #98OREB%31.0%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2017-18- 1Stanford 2025-2620-13ACCMost alike in Tempo, 3PA rate, TOV%95
- 2
Minnesota 2013-1424-13Big 10Most alike in 3PA rate, eFG%, Opp eFG%92 - 3
San FranciscoUSF 2019-2021-12WCCMost alike in Adj D, eFG%, TOV%91 - 4
Penn St. 2020-2111-14Big 10Most alike in 3PA rate, Adj O, Adj D90 - 5Stanford 2024-2521-14ACCMost alike in Adj D, Opp OREB%, Opp eFG%90
- 6Stanford 2022-2314-19Pac 12Most alike in eFG%, OREB%, FT rate89
- 7
Ohio 2020-2116-8MACMost alike in Adj O, FT rate, Opp TOV%89 - 8
Wyoming 2025-2617-15MWCMost alike in Adj D, 3PA rate, Opp OREB%89 - 9
Mercer 2013-1424-9ASUNMost alike in Opp TOV%, 3PA rate, Adj D88 - 10
Louisiana TechLa. Tech 2019-2020-8C-USAMost alike in OREB%, Opp OREB%, FT rate88
Schedule
Loading the schedule
KWKennyWootenFr
PaytonPritchardSoPWPaulWhiteJr
ElijahBrownSrTBTroyBrownFrMMMiKyleMcIntoshSr
Victor BaileyJr.Fr
AbuKigabFr
PaytonPritchardSoPWPaulWhiteJrElijahBrownSrTBTroyBrownFrMMMiKyleMcIntoshSrVictor BaileyJr.FrRSRomanSorkinSr
EGEvanGrossSr
KSKeithSmithSo
MCM.J.CageFrAbuKigabFr| K. WootenKenny Wooten | Fr | 6'9" | +1.593 | – | – | 68.0%92 | 14.3%24 | 6.4 | 4.5 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 59.4% |
| P. PritchardPayton Pritchard | So | 6'2" | +1.592 | – | – | 58.8%72 | 21.0%71 | 14.5 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 41.3% | 77.4% |
| P. WhitePaul White | Jr | 6'9" | +1.491 | – | – | 60.4%78 | 18.8%55 | 9.4 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 35.2% | 83.7% |
| E. BrownElijah Brown | Sr | 6'4" | +0.982 | – | – | 58.4%70 | 22.4%78 | 13.6 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 36.4% | 93.0% |
| T. BrownTroy Brown | Fr | 6'7" | +0.982 | – | – | 53.8%47 | 21.7%74 | 11.3 | 6.2 | 3.2 | 29.1% | 74.3% |
| M. McIntoshMiKyle McIntosh | Sr | 6'7" | +0.775 | – | – | 56.1%59 | 21.7%74 | 11.8 | 6.1 | 1.5 | 35.6% | 72.9% |
| V. Bailey Jr.Victor Bailey Jr. | Fr | 6'4" | +0.467 | – | – | 55.3%55 | 19.8%62 | 6.7 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 36.4% | 87.0% |
| R. SorkinRoman Sorkin | Sr | 6'10" | – | – | – | 61.3%80 | 18.1%50 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 33.3% | 77.8% |
| E. GrossEvan Gross | Sr | 5'10" | – | – | – | 100.0%99 | 33.6%99 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| K. SmithKeith Smith | So | 6'7" | – | – | – | 50.1%30 | 14.2%24 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.0% | 66.7% |
| M.J. Cage | Fr | 6'10" | – | – | – | 64.4%87 | 13.8%21 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 100.0% | 50.0% |
| A. KigabAbu Kigab | Fr | 6'6" | – | – | – | 39.6%10 | 16.1%37 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 22.7% | 40.9% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 12-20 | #107 | 4.970 | 111.563 | 106.671 | 11.994 | -439 | -1237 | 32.3%63 | +4119 | 49.5%19 | 32.1%20 | 73.0%54 |
| 24-255 | 25-10 | #31 | 19.192 | 116.990 | 97.893 | 12.695 | +7163 | +1859 | 30.5%52 | -3063 | 52.5%69 | 34.4%55 | 75.7%86 |
| 23-2411 | 24-12 | #59 | 12.184 | 113.985 | 101.880 | 8.386 | +1747 | -244 | 28.6%43 | -7686 | 51.9%63 | 33.8%46 | 71.9%48 |
| 22-23 | 21-15 | #48 | 13.287 | 112.286 | 99.085 | 9.195 | +18792 | -938 | 32.5%81 | +4520 | 51.1%50 | 32.0%16 | 69.5%26 |
| 21-22 | 20-15 | #80 | 8.776 | 109.380 | 100.671 | 6.882 | -1539 | +550 | 30.0%64 | -5476 | 51.1%60 | 33.3%40 | 67.9%16 |
| 19-20 | 24-7 | #11 | 19.697 | 117.399 | 97.778 | 8.893 | +6266 | +3370 | 32.7%88 | -5080 | 54.3%94 | 39.6%99 | 70.0%40 |
| 18-1912 | 25-13 | #27 | 16.293 | 109.779 | 93.596 | 6.782 | +5462 | +2864 | 29.6%61 | -7984 | 52.0%63 | 35.1%61 | 72.1%64 |
| 17-18 | 23-13 | #68 | 10.981 | 114.286 | 103.368 | 4.578 | +10777 | +3973 | 31.0%69 | -4876 | 53.3%75 | 35.7%60 | 76.3%92 |
| 16-173 | 33-6 | #13 | 23.997 | 117.596 | 93.696 | 8.084 | +16285 | +6182 | 32.6%80 | -6277 | 55.4%93 | 38.0%85 | 71.2%61 |
| 15-161 | 30-7 | #19 | 19.595 | 116.895 | 97.388 | 8.187 | +12681 | -1241 | 34.3%85 | -10293 | 52.5%81 | 34.3%46 | 71.4%67 |
| 14-158 | 25-10 | #58 | 10.783 | 111.591 | 100.864 | 7.786 | +4661 | +3171 | 30.8%45 | +843 | 52.4%83 | 36.2%75 | 76.0%97 |
| 13-147 | 24-10 | #27 | 17.193 | 118.998 | 101.871 | 8.792 | +3555 | +6189 | 32.2%54 | -6987 | 53.5%89 | 38.9%92 | 77.2%99 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
56.8%#65
Effective FG %
53.3%#75
3-Point %
35.7%#125
3PAR
42.1%#70
FTAR
31.7%#228
Assist %
56.4%#74
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
32.1%#215
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
28.5%#174
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
10 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0253D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.828952.6% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.252527.3% of shots
Late 21s+1.234320.1% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.135Allowed, D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.782446.9% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.54123.4% of shots
Late 21s+1.361429.7% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 351 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 17-18. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 17-18. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.