Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Big 10
Rutgers logo

Rutgers

14-17NET#92Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #92Coach: Steve Pikiell
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
WFairleigh Dickinson logoWDrexel logoLSt. John's logoWEastern Michigan logoWBoston University logoWMiami FL logoLMichigan St. logoLWisconsin logoLFordham logoLSeton Hall logoWColumbia logoWMaine logoLMaryland logoWOhio St. logoLMinnesota logoLPurdue logoLNorthwestern logoWNebraska logoWPenn St. logoWIndiana logoLOhio St. logoLMichigan logoLIllinois logoWNorthwestern logoLIowa logoLMichigan St. logoWMinnesota logoWIowa logoLPenn St. logoLIndiana logoLNebraska logo

Team Stats

31 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-1.335
  • Offensive Rating101.04
  • Defensive Rating102.386
  • Pace67.371
  • Effective FG%47.0%9
  • Off Rebound Pct33.4%90
  • Turnover Pct19.6%53
  • FT Attempt Rate31.7%37

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct45.2%37
  • Point Margin / Game-0.935
  • Points / Game67.919
  • Points Allowed / Game68.871
  • 1st Half Margin-1.427
  • 2nd Half Margin0.550
  • Avg Largest Lead10.136
  • Avg Largest Deficit11.932

Box Score

  • Points / Game67.919
  • Rebounds / Game39.093
  • Assists / Game12.633
  • ORebs / Game12.693
  • DRebs / Game26.476
  • Steals / Game6.560
  • Blocks / Game4.074
  • Turnovers / Game13.243
  • PFs / Game18.337

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game24.935
  • FGAs / Game59.472
  • Field Goal Pct41.9%17
  • 2PMs / Game18.766
  • 2PAs / Game39.789
  • 2-Point Pct47.2%17
  • 3PMs / Game6.212
  • 3PAs / Game19.719
  • 3-Point Pct31.2%11
  • FTMs / Game12.024
  • FTAs / Game18.847
  • Free Throw Pct63.7%4

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s55.1%91
  • % Pts from 3s27.2%16
  • % Pts from FTs17.7%35
  • Paint Pts / Game21.047
  • % Pts in Paint31.0%57
  • Fast Break Pts / Game7.886
  • % Pts on Fast Break11.5%90
  • Points off TOVs / Game11.652
  • % Pts off TOVs17.1%65
  • 1st Half Pts / Game30.512
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game36.734

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %50.1%5
  • Points / Shot1.145
  • 3-Point Att Rate33.2%12
  • Assist Pct50.6%36
  • Assists / 100 Poss18.720
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.96x33
  • PF Drawn / Game18.156

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%49.2%70
  • Opp True Shooting %52.5%78
  • Opp Field Goal Pct42.5%75
  • Opp 2-Point Pct47.0%86
  • Opp 3-Point Pct35.3%36
  • Opp 3PA Rate38.1%55
  • Opp FT Att Rate32.4%54
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2075

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game68.871
  • Paint Pts Allowed16.478
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed6.721
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed11.846
  • Opp Assist Pct51.1%58
  • TOVs Forced / Game12.027

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct73.0%67
  • Turnovers Forced Pct17.8%18
  • Steal Pct9.6%46
  • Block Pct5.9%65
  • Hakeem Pct15.6%59
  • PF Efficiency1.01x57
  • Steals / PF0.36x55
  • Blocks / PF0.22x71

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 295 D-I teams
  • #16FB Pts %17.0%
  • #31SOS9.8
  • #38Paint Pts %45.7%
  • #41OREB%33.4%
  • #58REB Diff+129
  • #65Adj DRtg99.0
  • #120Opp eFG%49.2%
  • #136Opp OREB%27.0%
Where they rank worstof 295 D-I teams
  • #335TS%49.7%
  • #325eFG%47.0%
  • #3183P%31.2%
  • #2873PM Diff-48
  • #241TOV%19.6%
  • #237Opp TOV%17.9%
  • #235Opp 3P%35.3%
  • #231Pts Diff-27
Game Log
Loading game log…
M. JohnsonFr6'10"+1.27954.2%5017.6%464.85.71.10.0%40.5%
C. McConnellFr6'6"+0.97055.4%5719.7%625.52.51.035.7%79.2%
E. OmoruyiJr6'7"+0.96751.8%3827.2%9413.87.22.431.1%71.4%
R. Harper Jr.Fr6'6"+0.96751.2%3517.8%487.83.11.127.8%67.9%
G. BakerSo6'4"+0.86347.3%2222.9%8112.23.14.134.1%74.1%
S. DoorsonSr7'0"+0.55158.1%6912.1%133.74.30.30.0%34.9%
I. ThiamJr6'10"+0.55044.8%1613.8%213.82.30.633.3%66.7%
P. KissSo6'5"+0.23448.2%2418.5%536.02.20.930.2%58.1%
M. MathisFr6'4"-0.21544.0%1522.7%808.52.91.123.9%55.6%
J. DownesSo5'11"5.6%30.0%0.0%
M. DoucoureSo6'9"12.5%312.9%160.31.70.00.0%0.0%
S. CarterJr6'9"61.9%8216.7%404.53.60.4100.0%71.1%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Rutgers logo25-2614-20#1590.956109.754108.8589.484-11214-561629.7%37-497747.2%632.4%2674.1%67
Rutgers logo24-2515-17#778.979114.683105.76611.692-4325-282530.8%53-457550.6%3832.9%3471.8%45
Rutgers logo23-2415-17#1105.870100.31894.6999.493-7918-571130.2%60-1129543.5%128.7%265.8%5
Rutgers logo22-2319-15#2615.793106.15590.5997.988+8671-501632.1%79-1049247.9%1332.1%1870.0%33
Rutgers logo21-221118-14#878.476106.36497.9857.184+6163-441729.6%60-105249.9%4233.9%5070.0%34
Rutgers logo19-2020-11#3015.492106.36991.0988.692+18392-561332.4%86-236349.3%4031.0%1664.4%6
Rutgers logo18-1914-17#926.774105.85499.0829.892+12986-481633.4%89+372347.0%831.2%1063.7%3
Rutgers logo17-1815-19#1332.96299.71596.8966.481+9576-86433.7%89-778844.2%129.0%164.4%3
Rutgers logo16-1715-18#1402.260100.83198.7835.479+16289-80737.5%98+104245.0%330.3%462.3%1
Rutgers logo15-166-25#301-12.31496.913109.3215.979-2213-104126.0%15+681146.1%1032.0%1768.0%29
Rutgers logo14-1510-22#208-3.24196.71699.9699.494-4629-73630.5%41+392343.6%429.5%465.3%13
Rutgers logo13-1411-21#204-2.842105.751108.5325.779-2139-392532.8%62+173947.8%2533.6%4170.6%55

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
49.7%#335
Effective FG %
47.0%#325
3-Point %
31.2%#317
3PAR
33.2%#308
FTAR
31.7%#221
Assist %
50.6%#225

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
39.6%#73
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
25.4%#167
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

23 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 42.8% of shots at 0.94 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0942.8%0.94Middle (11–20s): 30.8% of shots at 0.99 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0430.8%0.99Late (21s+): 26.3% of shots at 0.90 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9726.3%0.90SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 39.6% of shots at 0.93 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0739.6%0.93Middle (11–20s): 32.1% of shots at 1.01 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0232.1%1.01Late (21s+): 28.4% of shots at 0.92 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9528.4%0.92SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

23 games
Created byFinished by
Geo Baker → Eugene Omoruyi: 19 assisted baskets (14 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 4 from three)Geo Baker → Ron Harper Jr.: 19 assisted baskets (7 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 11 from three)Geo Baker → Montez Mathis: 17 assisted baskets (9 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 6 from three)Geo Baker → Shaquille Doorson: 8 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 4 mid-range · 0 from three)Geo Baker → Peter Kiss: 14 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 8 from three)Geo Baker → Issa Thiam: 9 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 7 from three)Geo Baker → Caleb McConnell: 7 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 5 from three)Eugene Omoruyi → Ron Harper Jr.: 9 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 4 from three)Eugene Omoruyi → Shaquille Doorson: 11 assisted baskets (8 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 0 from three)Eugene Omoruyi → Geo Baker: 11 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 9 from three)Ron Harper Jr. → Eugene Omoruyi: 9 assisted baskets (7 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 0 from three)Ron Harper Jr. → Montez Mathis: 10 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 3 from three)Montez Mathis → Eugene Omoruyi: 7 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 1 from three)Peter Kiss → Eugene Omoruyi: 6 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 3 from three)Baker93 astOmoruyi31 astHarper Jr.19 astMathisKissOmoruyi41 madeHarper Jr.28 madeMathis27 madeDoorson19 madeKiss14 madeBaker11 madeThiamMcConnell
Baker is the least-assisted finisher — 96% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.