Samford27-6

SouthernCoach: Bucky McMillan

27-6NET#76

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Rylan Jones	1,500	692	68.4%	+10.684	+12.196	+1.542	+2.676	+3.782	−3.086	+4.978	+3.318	−0.844	+2.180	−1.960
Jaden Campbell	1,217	976	55.5%	+19.798	+8.288	−11.592	+4.892	−4.914	−4.092	+0.958	−5.090	+1.666	+0.864	−9.490
Achor Achor	1,211	982	55.2%	+22.598	+9.190	−13.496	+2.880	+2.270	−2.986	+10.094	−4.688	+4.386	+2.080	−8.588
AJ Staton-McCray	1,059	1,134	48.3%	+1.254	+2.866	+1.640	+1.162	+3.380	+0.442	−3.036	+2.822	−0.448	+1.776	+3.530
Dallas Graziani	1,053	1,139	48.0%	+1.254	−1.144	−2.360	−2.328	+2.574	−1.470	−11.06	+3.516	−0.150	+3.592	−8.588
Garrett Hicks	1,011	1,181	46.1%	−6.428	−2.238	+4.228	+0.456	−0.844	+1.626	+5.280	+0.544	+0.656	−1.824	+6.218
Nathan Johnson	915	1,277	41.7%	−5.232	+0.654	+5.820	+0.656	−3.722	−1.672	+8.088	+2.624	−1.438	−1.626	−3.066
Riley Allenspach	675	1,517	30.8%	−18.46	−5.026	+13.44	−4.016	+0.556	−0.454	−12.84	+7.72	−0.050	−2.616	−2.764
Josh Holloway	644	1,549	29.4%	+2.058	−1.642	−3.768	+1.264	−1.538	+2.418	+2.666	−5.792	−0.150	−2.318	−2.966
Jermaine Marshall	622	1,570	28.4%	−3.836	−4.328	−0.450	−3.618	+3.882	+1.526	+3.070	−4.788	−4.614	−0.642	+12.04
Lukas Walls	479	1,713	21.9%	−16.68	−14.94	+1.640	−2.724	−4.814	+5.92	−0.152	+0.248	+1.162	+0.762	+8.512
Chandler Leopard	338	1,855	15.4%	−5.630	−6.122	−0.552	−2.128	−3.224	+1.132	−10.38	−2.372	+2.674	−2.022	+0.446
Zach Loveday	202	1,990	9.2%	−15.010	−16.34	−1.356	+1.364	−11.32	+8.30	−5.522	−6.294	−2.428	−0.740	+19.20

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Rylan Jones	1,500	692	68.4%	16.674	122.180	105.552	57.6%78	34.9%66	16.8%46	37.5%68	52.0%42	63.9%30	23.1%86	35.8%30
Jaden Campbell	1,217	976	55.5%	22.182	122.078	99.966	58.9%82	31.4%54	15.9%54	36.4%66	48.7%58	64.9%34	22.7%84	32.3%38
Achor Achor	1,211	982	55.2%	23.484	122.480	99.068	58.1%80	34.7%66	16.4%50	40.4%74	48.8%56	66.1%38	23.3%86	32.6%38
AJ Staton-McCray	1,059	1,134	48.3%	13.970	119.876	105.952	57.4%78	35.4%70	17.9%40	34.4%62	52.3%40	64.0%30	23.3%86	38.3%24
Dallas Graziani	1,053	1,139	48.0%	13.970	117.872	103.956	55.7%70	35.0%68	17.0%46	30.4%52	52.7%38	64.1%30	24.2%88	32.0%40
Garrett Hicks	1,011	1,181	46.1%	9.964	117.170	107.348	57.0%76	33.3%58	18.6%36	38.8%72	51.2%46	64.5%32	21.4%78	39.8%22
Nathan Johnson	915	1,277	41.7%	10.364	118.774	108.446	57.2%76	31.6%54	16.8%46	40.7%74	52.4%40	63.3%28	21.5%78	34.7%32
Riley Allenspach	675	1,517	30.8%	0.548	114.964	114.430	54.1%64	34.1%64	17.5%42	27.3%42	56.3%24	64.2%30	20.6%74	34.6%32
Josh Holloway	644	1,549	29.4%	14.772	117.270	102.560	57.7%78	32.6%58	19.4%30	37.8%70	47.0%66	64.1%30	20.8%74	34.5%34
Jermaine Marshall	622	1,570	28.4%	10.564	115.366	104.754	54.2%64	36.3%72	18.8%34	38.1%70	47.5%64	60.9%20	21.9%80	45.1%16
Lukas Walls	479	1,713	21.9%	0.346	106.644	106.350	54.7%66	29.8%46	22.3%16	35.9%66	51.1%46	65.0%34	22.9%84	43.2%18
Chandler Leopard	338	1,855	15.4%	8.662	113.260	104.654	55.0%68	31.0%52	18.7%34	27.2%42	48.9%56	66.3%38	20.7%74	36.7%28
Zach Loveday	202	1,990	9.2%	-0.446	103.538	103.956	58.1%80	23.3%22	25.3%6	30.9%54	45.3%72	62.0%24	21.7%80	53.8%8

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Rylan Jones	1,500	692	68.4%	6.058	110.152	104.056	55.0%68	31.2%52	19.8%28	32.6%58	48.7%58	64.7%32	21.0%76	37.7%26
Jaden Campbell	1,217	976	55.5%	2.450	113.862	111.438	54.2%64	36.3%72	20.0%26	35.4%64	53.7%34	63.2%26	22.0%80	41.7%18
Achor Achor	1,211	982	55.2%	0.948	113.360	112.434	55.3%68	32.5%58	19.4%30	30.4%52	53.4%36	61.8%22	21.3%78	41.1%20
AJ Staton-McCray	1,059	1,134	48.3%	12.768	117.070	104.256	56.3%74	32.0%56	17.6%42	37.4%68	49.6%54	64.4%32	21.5%78	34.7%32
Dallas Graziani	1,053	1,139	48.0%	12.768	118.874	106.250	57.9%80	32.5%58	18.4%36	41.5%76	49.2%56	64.2%30	20.7%74	40.5%20
Garrett Hicks	1,011	1,181	46.1%	16.274	119.374	103.158	56.6%74	34.0%64	17.0%46	33.6%60	50.7%48	63.9%30	23.2%86	33.6%34
Nathan Johnson	915	1,277	41.7%	15.572	118.172	102.660	56.6%74	35.2%68	18.4%36	32.7%58	49.8%54	64.8%32	23.1%86	37.7%26
Riley Allenspach	675	1,517	30.8%	18.978	119.976	101.064	58.1%80	33.5%62	17.9%40	40.1%74	48.5%58	64.2%30	23.2%86	37.3%26
Josh Holloway	644	1,549	29.4%	12.768	118.874	106.150	56.5%74	34.1%64	17.0%46	35.2%64	52.7%38	64.2%30	23.1%86	37.3%26
Jermaine Marshall	622	1,570	28.4%	14.470	119.574	105.254	57.8%78	32.6%58	17.3%44	35.1%64	52.2%40	65.6%36	22.6%84	33.1%36
Lukas Walls	479	1,713	21.9%	16.974	121.678	104.754	57.4%78	34.7%66	16.5%50	36.0%66	50.9%48	63.9%30	22.3%82	34.7%32
Chandler Leopard	338	1,855	15.4%	14.170	119.374	105.154	57.1%76	34.2%64	17.6%42	37.5%70	51.3%46	63.8%28	22.7%84	36.4%28
Zach Loveday	202	1,990	9.2%	14.772	119.876	105.254	56.7%74	34.6%66	17.0%46	36.4%66	51.5%44	64.4%32	22.5%82	34.6%32

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.