Southern Miss17-16

Sun BeltCoach: Jay Ladner

17-16NET#221

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tylik Weeks	1,918	336	85.1%	+19.298	+7.788	−11.694	+5.494	−0.746	+0.738	+4.174	−1.666	+11.4100	+0.866	−10.392
Dylan Brumfield	1,790	464	79.4%	+9.484	+8.188	−1.356	+5.194	+6.494	+4.24	+6.082	+1.532	+1.464	+1.676	−2.866
Djahi Binet	1,521	733	67.5%	+10.386	−3.334	−13.596	−0.346	+2.474	+3.010	−3.034	−5.190	+5.694	+1.270	−7.484
Curt Lewis	1,288	965	57.2%	+8.480	+2.162	−6.382	+1.062	−2.032	−0.456	−0.848	−5.392	+3.986	−2.218	+0.448
Israel Hart	1,227	1,027	54.4%	−2.142	+4.776	+6.814	+1.970	+0.556	−1.674	+6.884	+5.36	−1.732	+1.678	+1.044
Isaac Taveras	906	1,348	40.2%	+8.682	+2.866	−5.780	+1.668	+13.1100	+3.48	−2.438	−3.078	−3.122	+2.688	−0.250
Chiante' Tramble	688	1,566	30.5%	+4.568	−0.448	−4.976	+0.052	−9.32	−3.592	+3.470	−3.280	+0.556	−1.034	+1.740
Tegra Izay	583	1,671	25.9%	−1.644	+5.580	+7.114	+2.678	−3.620	−1.270	+4.676	+0.840	−4.912	−3.38	−2.262
Brewer Carruth	512	1,742	22.7%	−11.016	−6.718	+4.224	−3.220	+0.456	+3.010	+0.354	+1.334	+0.152	−0.444	+2.534
Dalyn Brandon	244	2,009	10.8%	−13.410	−5.324	+8.010	−2.426	−3.422	+0.542	−0.748	+1.928	−6.66	+0.560	+12.94
Fallou Diagne	234	2,020	10.4%	−15.38	−8.414	+6.814	−4.910	−9.12	−5.898	−15.32	+5.46	−1.634	−0.934	−4.172
Felipe Patino	134	2,120	6.0%	−22.54	−18.12	+4.424	−13.02	−2.132	−6.998	−16.02	−0.252	−2.924	−0.444	+1.740

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tylik Weeks	1,918	336	85.1%	1.748	106.138	104.456	49.6%36	32.5%60	18.5%30	43.6%72	50.8%50	73.0%64	18.0%64	42.1%26
Dylan Brumfield	1,790	464	79.4%	0.646	106.640	106.054	49.9%36	34.1%66	19.3%24	44.3%74	51.4%48	71.5%58	18.2%64	43.2%24
Djahi Binet	1,521	733	67.5%	2.150	103.934	101.864	48.7%34	33.4%66	19.4%24	42.0%70	49.4%58	73.0%64	18.3%66	41.4%26
Curt Lewis	1,288	965	57.2%	2.350	105.938	103.660	49.2%36	31.8%58	18.2%32	42.7%70	48.8%60	72.8%62	16.9%56	44.0%22
Israel Hart	1,227	1,027	54.4%	-2.342	107.140	109.444	49.6%36	32.8%62	17.7%34	46.1%76	53.6%38	70.4%52	18.6%68	44.2%22
Isaac Taveras	906	1,348	40.2%	3.852	106.740	102.862	49.7%36	40.5%86	20.4%18	41.6%68	49.3%58	69.4%46	19.4%74	43.7%22
Chiante' Tramble	688	1,566	30.5%	1.848	104.736	102.962	48.8%34	26.2%34	16.0%48	45.4%76	48.9%60	71.6%58	17.2%58	45.0%20
Tegra Izay	583	1,671	25.9%	-2.442	109.146	111.540	50.8%42	29.9%50	17.5%36	46.4%78	51.7%46	67.6%38	15.5%44	42.2%26
Brewer Carruth	512	1,742	22.7%	-9.730	99.826	109.544	46.3%24	33.0%62	20.7%18	43.3%72	52.1%44	71.3%54	17.5%60	45.7%18
Dalyn Brandon	244	2,009	10.8%	-13.226	100.226	113.436	46.7%26	29.6%48	18.8%28	42.3%70	52.7%42	65.4%30	18.3%66	55.2%10
Fallou Diagne	234	2,020	10.4%	-15.022	97.422	112.438	44.4%18	24.6%28	13.2%68	29.5%40	55.9%28	69.7%48	17.1%58	40.1%28
Felipe Patino	134	2,120	6.0%	-22.514	88.010	110.542	36.7%6	30.7%52	11.9%78	28.1%36	50.9%50	68.5%42	17.5%60	45.4%20

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tylik Weeks	1,918	336	85.1%	-17.520	98.524	116.030	44.3%18	33.2%62	17.8%34	39.6%64	52.4%44	61.6%18	17.2%58	52.4%12
Dylan Brumfield	1,790	464	79.4%	-8.832	98.524	107.350	44.8%20	27.7%40	15.1%56	38.3%62	49.9%58	70.1%50	16.6%54	46.0%18
Djahi Binet	1,521	733	67.5%	-8.232	107.240	115.430	49.0%34	31.0%54	16.4%44	45.0%76	54.5%34	67.4%38	17.1%58	48.7%16
Curt Lewis	1,288	965	57.2%	-6.134	103.834	109.944	48.2%32	33.7%66	18.6%28	43.5%72	54.2%36	68.9%44	19.1%72	43.6%22
Israel Hart	1,227	1,027	54.4%	-0.246	102.430	102.662	47.8%30	32.3%60	19.3%24	39.3%64	48.3%64	72.1%60	17.0%56	43.3%24
Isaac Taveras	906	1,348	40.2%	-4.738	103.834	108.646	48.1%32	27.4%40	17.1%40	44.0%74	52.3%44	72.5%62	16.8%56	43.9%22
Chiante' Tramble	688	1,566	30.5%	-2.640	105.136	107.748	48.8%34	35.5%72	19.5%24	42.0%70	52.0%44	71.0%54	18.2%64	43.3%22
Tegra Izay	583	1,671	25.9%	-0.844	103.532	104.458	48.1%30	33.5%66	18.7%28	41.8%70	50.9%50	72.6%62	18.7%68	44.4%22
Brewer Carruth	512	1,742	22.7%	1.348	106.540	105.254	49.5%36	32.5%60	17.7%34	42.9%72	50.8%52	71.2%54	18.0%64	43.2%24
Dalyn Brandon	244	2,009	10.8%	0.246	105.638	105.454	49.1%34	33.0%62	18.4%30	43.1%72	50.9%50	72.0%58	17.8%62	42.4%24
Fallou Diagne	234	2,020	10.4%	0.346	105.838	105.654	49.4%36	33.7%66	19.0%26	44.7%74	50.5%52	71.4%56	18.0%64	44.2%22
Felipe Patino	134	2,120	6.0%	0.046	106.138	106.054	49.7%36	32.8%62	18.8%28	44.1%74	51.1%50	71.4%56	17.9%62	43.7%22

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Southern MissSo. Miss17-16

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Southern Miss17-16