Tennessee Martin19-11

OVCCoach: Jeremy Shulman

19-11NET#200

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Andrija Bukumirović	1,399	485	74.3%	+14.994	+16.3100	+1.440	+6.496	+4.286	−3.592	+1.962	−0.858	−2.130	−0.934	−5.980
Matas Deniusas	1,280	603	68.0%	+12.290	+13.798	+1.540	+1.566	+4.186	−4.696	−0.450	+3.912	+3.986	−0.444	−9.190
Filip Petkovski	1,154	730	61.3%	−3.338	+0.756	+4.026	−0.842	+3.180	−1.574	−9.310	+3.118	+6.796	−3.110	−2.262
Filip Radaković	1,031	852	54.7%	+9.786	+8.890	−1.054	−2.030	+6.996	−3.190	+8.590	−0.352	−0.940	−0.444	−13.996
Afan Trnka	1,027	857	54.5%	−7.224	−2.338	+5.022	+1.162	−5.510	+2.910	+13.998	−0.354	−3.518	−1.822	+11.26
Pedro Santos	826	1,057	43.9%	−1.644	−3.830	−2.262	−2.228	−1.834	−2.080	−4.030	+1.928	−2.824	+5.098	−5.980
Damien King	576	1,307	30.6%	+13.892	+6.484	−7.486	+2.576	+2.878	−2.382	−10.08	−2.070	+2.980	+1.778	−0.854
Vladimir Khryapa	567	1,317	30.1%	−8.322	−14.04	−5.880	−5.78	+1.062	+4.06	−5.224	−2.676	+2.476	+3.092	+13.62
Luca Colceag	478	1,405	25.4%	−8.122	−8.016	+0.248	−0.050	−4.216	+3.66	+6.082	+0.544	+0.658	−1.230	−1.258
AJ Hopkins	437	1,446	23.2%	−6.826	−8.714	−1.960	−1.732	−5.310	+1.722	−7.416	−3.884	−2.824	+0.254	+6.018
Lamine Niang	291	1,593	15.4%	−12.014	−15.64	−3.570	−1.930	−7.74	+3.010	−8.512	−5.492	−7.06	+0.764	+1.540
Dragos Lungu	230	1,653	12.2%	−1.446	+2.866	+4.226	+8.0100	−1.340	+4.62	+17.5100	+1.038	+7.898	−2.910	+21.80

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Andrija Bukumirović	1,399	485	74.3%	7.158	105.136	97.972	49.6%36	37.5%78	20.7%18	37.2%60	46.0%72	67.4%38	19.8%74	33.8%44
Matas Deniusas	1,280	603	68.0%	7.258	105.336	98.172	48.4%32	37.7%78	20.1%20	36.6%58	47.5%66	69.2%46	19.9%76	32.3%48
Filip Petkovski	1,154	730	61.3%	2.048	101.228	99.170	47.7%30	37.6%78	21.0%16	33.3%50	47.4%66	70.5%52	18.8%70	34.3%42
Filip Radaković	1,031	852	54.7%	7.760	104.836	97.174	47.1%28	39.4%84	20.2%20	40.5%66	46.1%72	67.5%38	19.9%74	29.2%58
Afan Trnka	1,027	857	54.5%	0.046	99.826	99.868	48.5%32	33.8%66	22.9%10	43.5%72	46.1%72	66.3%32	19.2%72	40.3%28
Pedro Santos	826	1,057	43.9%	2.450	98.724	96.376	46.8%26	35.4%72	20.4%18	34.5%54	47.2%68	66.3%32	22.8%88	31.9%50
Damien King	576	1,307	30.6%	12.968	105.436	92.582	49.7%36	38.4%80	20.0%20	29.9%42	44.8%78	69.9%48	21.2%82	34.7%42
Vladimir Khryapa	567	1,317	30.1%	-2.542	91.112	93.680	44.0%16	37.2%76	24.4%6	33.1%50	44.4%78	69.6%48	22.1%84	44.9%20
Luca Colceag	478	1,405	25.4%	-2.840	94.918	97.772	48.0%30	33.2%62	24.3%6	41.3%68	46.5%70	68.3%42	19.1%72	34.3%42
AJ Hopkins	437	1,446	23.2%	-1.942	94.216	96.176	46.7%26	32.4%60	22.9%10	31.0%44	43.3%82	65.7%32	20.2%76	39.8%30
Lamine Niang	291	1,593	15.4%	-6.934	87.710	94.678	46.4%24	29.9%50	24.1%6	29.5%40	41.6%86	62.0%20	20.6%78	36.5%38
Dragos Lungu	230	1,653	12.2%	2.150	103.332	101.366	55.1%62	35.3%70	25.6%4	52.4%84	47.1%68	74.8%70	17.5%60	54.6%10

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Andrija Bukumirović	1,399	485	74.3%	-7.832	88.710	96.574	43.2%16	33.3%66	24.1%6	35.3%56	46.8%70	69.5%48	20.7%80	39.6%30
Matas Deniusas	1,280	603	68.0%	-5.038	91.514	96.674	47.0%26	33.6%66	24.7%6	37.0%60	43.5%82	65.3%30	20.3%78	41.4%26
Filip Petkovski	1,154	730	61.3%	5.354	100.426	95.178	48.5%34	34.5%68	22.5%10	42.6%70	44.3%78	63.8%26	21.9%84	36.6%38
Filip Radaković	1,031	852	54.7%	-2.042	96.120	98.172	49.1%36	32.6%60	23.2%8	32.0%46	46.4%70	68.4%42	20.2%78	43.1%24
Afan Trnka	1,027	857	54.5%	7.358	102.130	94.978	47.5%28	39.4%84	20.0%20	29.6%40	46.4%70	69.8%48	21.0%80	29.1%58
Pedro Santos	826	1,057	43.9%	4.052	102.530	98.670	49.0%34	37.3%76	22.4%10	38.5%62	45.4%74	69.1%46	17.8%62	37.8%34
Damien King	576	1,307	30.6%	-0.944	98.924	99.868	47.2%28	35.6%72	22.3%12	40.0%66	46.8%70	67.0%38	19.5%74	35.4%40
Vladimir Khryapa	567	1,317	30.1%	5.756	105.136	99.470	49.7%36	36.1%74	20.4%18	38.3%62	46.9%68	67.2%38	19.1%72	31.3%52
Luca Colceag	478	1,405	25.4%	5.454	102.932	97.574	48.0%30	37.4%76	20.6%18	35.3%56	46.1%72	67.7%40	20.3%78	35.5%40
AJ Hopkins	437	1,446	23.2%	4.954	102.932	98.072	48.4%32	37.7%78	21.2%16	38.4%62	47.1%68	68.6%44	20.0%76	33.8%44
Lamine Niang	291	1,593	15.4%	5.254	103.332	98.172	48.3%32	37.6%78	21.1%16	38.0%62	47.0%68	69.0%46	19.9%76	35.0%42
Dragos Lungu	230	1,653	12.2%	3.552	100.526	97.174	47.2%28	36.6%74	21.0%16	34.9%54	46.1%72	67.0%38	20.4%78	32.8%46

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Tennessee MartinUT Martin19-11

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Tennessee Martin19-11