Troy21-11

Sun BeltCoach: Scott Cross

21-11NET#92

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tayton Conerway	1,591	422	79.0%	+19.998	+14.498	−5.578	+6.798	+4.386	−2.684	−3.432	−2.476	−0.448	+1.170	+4.824
Myles Rigsby	1,455	558	72.3%	+8.682	+4.072	−4.674	+1.972	−4.216	−2.786	+6.986	−2.374	−2.724	+2.284	+0.944
Thomas Dowd	1,360	653	67.6%	+18.096	+4.976	−13.196	−1.436	+3.178	−2.180	+5.682	−7.798	+2.676	+0.662	+8.510
Marcus Rigsby Jr.	1,182	832	58.7%	−1.046	−9.810	−8.888	−2.326	−0.746	+4.14	−5.224	−5.994	+0.758	+1.170	+4.424
Jackson Fields	1,167	847	57.9%	+8.782	+6.784	−2.060	+0.152	+0.556	−2.684	+5.178	−0.050	+2.474	−0.050	+1.740
Victor Valdes	790	1,223	39.2%	−8.622	−4.826	+3.828	−1.734	−2.032	+0.542	−3.530	+1.236	+1.364	−2.514	−2.262
Cooper Campbell	752	1,261	37.4%	−0.748	+9.892	+10.56	+1.668	+1.666	−4.294	+3.572	+7.62	+1.162	−0.740	−4.072
Theo Seng	574	1,440	28.5%	−13.810	−4.328	+9.58	+0.454	−4.614	+0.638	−1.842	+5.46	−2.130	−0.640	−7.084
Jerrell Bellamy	450	1,564	22.3%	−15.38	−9.312	+5.920	−1.734	−1.638	+3.48	−2.836	+1.632	−6.46	−0.740	−13.396
Randarius Jones	331	1,682	16.5%	+8.480	−0.648	−9.088	+1.062	+3.582	+1.232	−9.78	−3.684	+5.894	+0.560	+8.610
Kerrington Kiel	327	1,686	16.3%	−14.510	−9.212	+5.322	−4.214	+2.876	+3.76	+1.562	+3.118	+0.354	−0.544	−4.774

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tayton Conerway	1,591	422	79.0%	14.470	113.760	99.368	51.4%50	41.7%86	19.9%26	36.1%66	47.1%66	66.7%42	20.2%72	30.2%46
Myles Rigsby	1,455	558	72.3%	12.668	111.856	99.270	50.6%46	39.6%80	19.7%28	38.8%72	46.9%66	66.0%38	20.6%74	29.4%50
Thomas Dowd	1,360	653	67.6%	16.074	112.258	96.374	49.5%40	41.8%86	19.8%28	38.6%72	45.1%74	67.6%44	20.2%72	31.9%42
Marcus Rigsby Jr.	1,182	832	58.7%	9.864	106.644	96.974	49.0%38	40.5%84	22.2%16	34.6%62	45.1%74	67.1%42	20.5%72	31.0%44
Jackson Fields	1,167	847	57.9%	13.870	113.560	99.768	50.0%46	41.0%84	19.4%30	38.9%72	47.6%64	67.8%44	20.0%70	29.9%48
Victor Valdes	790	1,223	39.2%	4.956	107.746	102.860	49.0%38	39.6%80	20.8%22	34.6%62	48.3%60	67.6%44	18.5%60	27.8%54
Cooper Campbell	752	1,261	37.4%	9.864	116.868	107.050	51.0%48	41.8%86	17.8%40	38.9%72	52.3%42	67.5%44	19.6%68	26.6%58
Theo Seng	574	1,440	28.5%	0.348	107.646	107.350	50.3%46	37.5%76	20.9%22	35.5%66	51.5%46	65.3%36	19.5%68	24.2%66
Jerrell Bellamy	450	1,564	22.3%	-1.744	103.436	105.154	48.7%36	39.6%80	23.1%12	34.6%62	48.9%58	61.9%22	19.5%66	19.1%80
Randarius Jones	331	1,682	16.5%	17.176	110.252	93.180	50.8%46	43.8%90	21.4%18	28.7%46	44.5%76	71.7%62	20.4%72	36.4%30
Kerrington Kiel	327	1,686	16.3%	-1.944	103.034	104.954	46.5%28	43.1%90	23.5%12	38.0%70	50.2%50	67.0%42	19.6%68	25.2%62

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tayton Conerway	1,591	422	79.0%	-5.538	99.328	104.856	44.6%20	37.4%74	22.5%14	39.5%74	49.5%56	67.1%42	19.2%64	25.4%62
Myles Rigsby	1,455	558	72.3%	4.054	107.846	103.858	48.6%36	43.8%90	22.4%14	31.9%56	49.2%56	68.7%48	18.4%60	28.5%52
Thomas Dowd	1,360	653	67.6%	-2.044	107.446	109.444	51.0%48	38.7%78	21.9%16	33.0%58	52.7%40	65.0%34	19.5%68	23.5%68
Marcus Rigsby Jr.	1,182	832	58.7%	10.866	116.468	105.654	51.4%50	41.2%86	18.0%40	39.8%74	51.0%48	66.4%38	19.3%66	26.6%58
Jackson Fields	1,167	847	57.9%	5.156	106.844	101.764	49.9%40	40.5%84	22.0%16	33.8%60	47.6%64	65.4%36	20.0%70	28.2%54
Victor Valdes	790	1,223	39.2%	13.670	112.658	99.070	50.7%46	41.6%86	20.3%24	38.2%70	47.1%66	66.3%38	21.0%76	30.0%46
Cooper Campbell	752	1,261	37.4%	10.564	107.044	96.574	49.4%40	40.2%82	22.0%16	35.5%64	44.7%76	66.4%38	20.2%72	30.6%46
Theo Seng	574	1,440	28.5%	14.170	111.956	97.872	49.9%40	42.1%88	20.3%24	37.3%68	46.0%70	67.4%42	20.2%70	31.2%44
Jerrell Bellamy	450	1,564	22.3%	13.670	112.858	99.270	50.4%46	41.2%84	19.7%28	37.4%68	47.2%66	68.3%46	20.1%70	32.4%40
Randarius Jones	331	1,682	16.5%	8.762	110.854	102.062	49.8%40	40.2%82	20.3%24	38.5%72	48.2%62	65.8%38	19.9%70	27.8%54
Kerrington Kiel	327	1,686	16.3%	12.668	112.258	99.668	50.7%46	40.3%82	19.9%26	36.5%68	47.1%66	66.7%42	20.1%70	30.0%48

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.