Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
C-USA
UAB logo

UAB

16-13NET#164Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #83Coach: Jerod Haase
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
WCSWRutgers logoWTroy logoLNew Mexico logoWNebraska logoLTemple logoWFlorida A&M logoWNorth Carolina logoWNortheastern logoWGeorgia Southern logoWChattanooga logoLLSU logoWAlabama A&M logoWNELMiddle Tennessee logoWUTSA logoLUTEP logoLNorth Texas logoWTulsa logoWOld Dominion logoLEast Carolina logoLFIU logoLFlorida Atlantic logoWSouthern Miss logoLTulane logoWMarshall logoWCharlotte logoWRice logoLLouisiana Tech logoLMiddle Tennessee logoLCharlotte logo

Team Stats

31 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating4.161
  • Offensive Rating107.913
  • Defensive Rating103.886
  • Pace67.893
  • Effective FG%45.8%6
  • Off Rebound Pct39.8%99
  • Turnover Pct19.2%69
  • FT Attempt Rate40.2%50

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct58.1%64
  • Point Margin / Game2.863
  • Points / Game73.170
  • Points Allowed / Game70.348
  • 1st Half Margin1.864
  • 2nd Half Margin0.959
  • Avg Largest Lead
  • Avg Largest Deficit

Box Score

  • Points / Game73.170
  • Rebounds / Game44.5100
  • Assists / Game12.650
  • ORebs / Game16.4100
  • DRebs / Game28.299
  • Steals / Game5.529
  • Blocks / Game4.166
  • Turnovers / Game13.031
  • PFs / Game17.582

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game25.878
  • FGAs / Game61.998
  • Field Goal Pct41.7%14
  • 2PMs / Game20.792
  • 2PAs / Game45.099
  • 2-Point Pct46.1%16
  • 3PMs / Game5.117
  • 3PAs / Game16.935
  • 3-Point Pct30.1%5
  • FTMs / Game16.467
  • FTAs / Game24.983
  • Free Throw Pct65.8%13

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s56.7%89
  • % Pts from 3s20.9%11
  • % Pts from FTs22.4%58
  • Paint Pts / Game26.699
  • % Pts in Paint36.4%100
  • Fast Break Pts / Game2.653
  • % Pts on Fast Break3.6%51
  • Points off TOVs / Game9.348
  • % Pts off TOVs12.7%41
  • 1st Half Pts / Game35.180
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game37.148

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %50.2%5
  • Points / Shot1.187
  • 3-Point Att Rate27.4%13
  • Assist Pct49.0%29
  • Assists / 100 Poss18.717
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.97x38
  • PF Drawn / Game20.174

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%46.7%83
  • Opp True Shooting %50.2%92
  • Opp Field Goal Pct41.6%80
  • Opp 2-Point Pct46.2%76
  • Opp 3-Point Pct31.9%85
  • Opp 3PA Rate32.3%57
  • Opp FT Att Rate30.9%95
  • Opp Points / Shot1.1496

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game70.348
  • Paint Pts Allowed22.96
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed4.212
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed12.219
  • Opp Assist Pct50.7%60
  • TOVs Forced / Game10.714

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct70.3%72
  • Turnovers Forced Pct15.4%2
  • Steal Pct8.0%12
  • Block Pct6.1%48
  • Hakeem Pct14.1%20
  • PF Efficiency0.93x83
  • Steals / PF0.31x42
  • Blocks / PF0.24x80

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
  • #4OREB%40.1%
  • #10REB Diff+252
  • #16Paint Pts %47.2%
  • #18PO TOV Diff-94
  • #38Opp 3P%31.3%
  • #63Opp eFG%46.5%
  • #116Opp OREB%29.8%
  • #137Pts Diff+86
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
  • #3343P%30.1%
  • #334TS%49.6%
  • #329eFG%45.8%
  • #321Opp TOV%15.9%
  • #2743PM Diff-42
  • #248AST%49.0%
  • #204Adj ORtg103.9
  • #199SOS-2.0
Game Log
Loading game log…
C.J. WashingtonJr6'8"+1.07453.8%5921.6%7412.76.80.532.4%55.6%
J. SwingSr6'6"+0.97045.9%2515.2%315.63.32.021.2%69.8%
R. WilliamsSr6'4"+0.76249.6%3719.2%598.46.61.428.2%64.3%
C. FrazierJr6'4"+0.55252.8%5427.6%9517.93.34.033.3%72.7%
D. WattsFr6'2"+0.54852.4%5113.3%193.41.81.430.3%62.9%
F. AlihodzicSr6'10"+0.12947.3%2919.1%588.66.30.60.0%59.2%
R. RuckerSr6'5"-0.21544.2%2121.9%7610.97.12.014.3%68.2%
K. MotonSr5'11"75.0%9814.1%240.80.50.050.0%0.0%
P. PurifoySr6'5"54.7%6311.1%111.71.00.237.5%63.6%
T. MadisonFr6'4"45.7%2418.0%502.42.00.314.3%51.7%
T. MehintiFr6'9"53.7%5813.7%212.93.10.10.0%63.3%
T. RideauJr6'4"56.7%7313.4%202.10.80.338.5%0.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
UAB logo25-2620-12#1203.967110.256106.373-1.359+11678-77633.0%70-949148.6%1228.1%170.5%30
UAB logo24-2524-13#956.074116.287110.236-0.464+19691-332437.9%98-417050.6%3933.7%4576.4%89
UAB logo23-241223-12#1164.668112.179107.5463.274+11480-531535.5%94+34350.1%3632.7%3074.6%80
UAB logo22-2329-10#4813.387114.092100.7791.069+21494-74035.8%97-648050.8%4635.5%7274.1%76
UAB logo21-221227-8#3813.889113.69399.776-1.354+15787+346933.7%90-1519753.0%8237.6%9473.9%72
UAB logo19-2019-13#201-2.443100.134102.551-3.337+20594-78731.9%82+79750.3%5532.8%4170.4%46
UAB logo18-1920-15#1570.955106.760105.746-2.541+13183-631130.7%71-235951.1%5333.7%3867.4%16
UAB logo17-1820-13#1036.071110.072104.063-1.353+22096-69831.2%71+233154.5%8734.5%4175.0%85
UAB logo16-1717-16#176-0.550104.352104.849-2.243+10878-471830.3%59+631351.8%6534.8%4773.6%81
UAB logo15-1625-7#1056.270109.878103.656-3.828+11381+176232.6%76-45154.1%9137.2%8472.2%75
UAB logo14-151419-16#1501.557102.649101.1611.367+5363-153834.2%78+64447.7%2933.3%3873.8%91
UAB logo13-1416-13#1640.053103.942103.961-2.043+25299-422140.1%99+581445.8%630.1%565.8%13

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
49.6%#333
Effective FG %
45.8%#328
3-Point %
30.1%#334
3PAR
27.4%#303
FTAR
40.2%#174
Assist %
49.0%#248

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
44.7%#28
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
28.7%#125
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

18 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 53.4% of shots at 0.62 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0953.4%0.62Middle (11–20s): 29.0% of shots at 1.13 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0429.0%1.13Late (21s+): 17.6% of shots at 1.16 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9717.6%1.16SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 52.9% of shots at 0.75 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0752.9%0.75Middle (11–20s): 27.3% of shots at 1.18 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0227.3%1.18Late (21s+): 19.8% of shots at 1.21 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9519.8%1.21SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

18 games
Created byFinished by
Chad Frazier → C.J. Washington: 18 assisted baskets (11 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 6 from three)Chad Frazier → Fahro Alihodzic: 8 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 0 from three)Chad Frazier → Robert Williams: 9 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Chad Frazier → Rod Rucker: 15 assisted baskets (8 at the rim · 7 mid-range · 0 from three)Chad Frazier → Jordan Swing: 8 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Rod Rucker → C.J. Washington: 7 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 3 from three)Rod Rucker → Fahro Alihodzic: 7 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 4 mid-range · 0 from three)Rod Rucker → Chad Frazier: 6 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)Rod Rucker → Robert Williams: 8 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 3 from three)Robert Williams → C.J. Washington: 6 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 2 from three)Robert Williams → Fahro Alihodzic: 5 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 0 from three)Robert Williams → Chad Frazier: 5 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)Jordan Swing → Fahro Alihodzic: 8 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 0 from three)Jordan Swing → Chad Frazier: 7 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 6 from three)Frazier58 astRucker28 astWilliams16 astSwing15 astWashington31 madeAlihodzic28 madeFrazier18 madeWilliams17 madeRucker15 madeSwing8 made
Frazier is the least-assisted finisher — 96% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 13-14. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 13-14. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.