Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
UT Arlington logoUT Arlington logoUT Arlington logoUT Arlington logo

UT Arlington18-14

WACCoach: KT Turner

18-14NET#126

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Shemar Wilson+4.970−3.234−8.186−1.634+0.152+1.328+3.874−7.196+1.364−1.924−3.468
DaJuan Gordon+11.788+2.664−9.288+0.758+1.868+0.246−3.234−0.758+6.394+1.878−9.990
Makaih Williams+0.752−2.736−3.466+0.254+3.882+4.56−7.018+1.138−2.430+5.098+2.734
Akili Vining−2.442+2.866+5.322+1.364−2.132−1.874+10.794+0.148−0.844−2.814+5.022
Aaron Cash+9.582+3.368−6.280+3.080−0.844−0.454−15.42+0.150+2.574+3.090−7.986
Phillip Russell+9.382+9.692+0.348+2.778−0.150−3.488−0.748+1.038−6.08+4.496−1.256
Brandyn Talbot+1.856+2.864+1.044+1.970−2.034−1.166+4.174−0.454+6.194−3.310+3.032
Dwayne Koroma−17.58−6.520+11.06−1.536+1.060+1.132−3.930+5.38+0.656−5.14−6.682
Kade Douglas−21.14−12.38+8.910−4.114−2.828+3.012−2.140−1.464−8.24−2.616+9.110
Sterling Gaston-Chapman+11.286+6.982−4.472−0.744+1.866−2.986+20.6100−2.574−0.248+2.888+17.60
Fabio Basili−18.36−6.720+11.66−5.48−2.430+0.048+6.684+5.76+0.252−3.68+7.514

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Shemar Wilson1.448106.044104.65451.1%5035.2%6822.6%1440.1%7447.9%6267.5%4418.8%6441.4%20
DaJuan Gordon3.252107.346104.25651.7%5435.7%7022.4%1638.5%7049.3%5468.9%5019.7%6839.6%22
Makaih Williams0.548105.742105.25451.6%5236.7%7424.0%1036.7%6849.9%5466.3%3821.2%7643.2%18
Akili Vining-0.844107.948108.74452.1%5634.3%6421.5%1844.0%8049.5%5466.9%4218.1%5844.3%16
Aaron Cash4.956108.348103.45853.0%5834.8%6622.1%1631.9%5649.5%5468.5%4820.7%7438.3%24
Phillip Russell5.156111.658106.65052.9%5835.2%6820.6%2238.9%7250.0%5464.2%3021.6%7841.5%20
Brandyn Talbot1.448108.448107.04852.7%5833.9%6421.6%1841.8%7649.2%5671.0%6017.2%5244.0%16
Dwayne Koroma-10.930102.534113.43250.6%4835.8%7023.0%1236.8%6852.8%3867.6%4416.0%4438.1%24
Kade Douglas-16.32297.124113.43248.3%3633.1%5824.7%837.6%7048.4%5861.0%2017.2%5249.2%10
Sterling Gaston-Chapman9.764112.558102.86051.0%4836.7%7419.9%2656.6%9247.3%6467.1%4221.6%8057.2%6
Fabio Basili-16.422100.630117.02646.6%3033.0%5822.4%1645.3%8254.6%3067.4%4416.0%4449.0%12

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Shemar Wilson-3.540109.250112.73452.8%5835.1%6821.3%2036.3%6655.1%2866.2%3820.7%7444.8%16
DaJuan Gordon-8.532104.840113.33451.0%5033.8%6422.2%1641.7%7650.0%5462.6%2417.9%5649.5%10
Makaih Williams-0.246108.448108.54451.4%5032.8%5819.5%2843.6%8048.8%5668.7%4816.1%4440.5%20
Akili Vining1.750105.140103.55850.8%4836.4%7223.4%1233.4%6049.4%5467.7%4420.8%7639.3%22
Aaron Cash-4.638105.040109.74249.9%4235.6%7022.5%1447.4%8449.4%5466.0%3617.7%5646.2%14
Phillip Russell-4.340102.134106.35050.2%4635.3%6824.0%1039.6%7249.0%5670.2%5617.1%5242.8%18
Brandyn Talbot-0.446105.642106.15050.8%4836.0%7222.8%1437.7%7049.7%5464.9%3420.6%7441.0%20
Dwayne Koroma6.658109.050102.46052.0%5434.8%6621.9%1840.7%7447.5%6467.1%4221.1%7644.7%16
Kade Douglas4.856109.450104.55652.4%5635.9%7021.7%1839.7%7449.8%5469.2%5019.8%7040.1%22
Sterling Gaston-Chapman-1.644105.642107.24851.6%5234.9%6822.8%1436.0%6649.9%5467.3%4218.8%6439.6%22
Fabio Basili1.950107.346105.45252.0%5435.4%7022.3%1638.7%7249.0%5667.2%4219.6%6841.5%20
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.