UT Arlington11-18

WACCoach: KT Turner

11-18NET#243

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Brody Robinson	1,352	401	77.1%	−12.014	−8.514	+3.530	−4.014	−5.410	−1.572	+2.666	+2.920	−2.824	−0.936	−11.694
Lance Ware	1,262	492	71.9%	−2.242	−8.114	−5.980	−2.724	−0.150	+2.416	+0.958	−1.566	−1.338	+2.486	−18.798
Darius Burford	1,141	613	65.0%	+8.180	+7.084	−1.154	+3.584	−2.132	−2.988	+11.996	+0.346	−0.942	+1.878	−7.886
Raysean Seamster	1,079	675	61.5%	+1.256	−4.428	−5.778	+0.758	−2.232	+0.442	+7.086	−0.454	+1.364	+2.586	−1.758
Jaden Wells	959	795	54.7%	+4.568	+5.378	+0.844	−0.842	+2.070	−2.078	−11.06	+3.614	+3.078	+2.890	+6.218
Brandyn Talbot	875	879	49.9%	−3.238	−4.328	−1.156	−1.238	−0.546	+1.824	−8.512	−2.374	−1.636	+0.356	+2.336
Diante Smith	659	1,095	37.6%	+1.054	+2.868	+1.938	+0.556	+7.898	+1.822	−4.228	−2.374	−1.438	−2.318	+12.36
Kade Douglas	549	1,204	31.3%	+3.564	−1.046	−4.574	+3.484	−7.16	+0.936	+5.982	−3.482	+2.474	−2.614	−4.774
Jaxon Ellingsworth	464	1,290	26.4%	−7.126	+1.862	+8.910	+0.960	−1.736	+0.934	+2.366	+1.730	−0.644	−1.822	+14.54
Troy Hupstead	241	1,513	13.7%	+6.274	+9.090	+2.934	−2.426	+6.494	−4.294	−6.020	+0.740	+2.374	−3.110	+8.410
Cameron Jackson	128	1,625	7.3%	+10.386	+0.252	−10.192	−0.446	+1.666	−1.268	+4.376	−4.186	−0.248	−0.148	−4.172

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Brody Robinson	1,352	401	77.1%	-6.636	105.440	112.036	51.3%50	33.5%62	19.4%30	38.3%70	50.9%50	64.3%32	16.3%44	31.5%42
Lance Ware	1,262	492	71.9%	-4.540	105.040	109.544	51.5%50	34.7%66	20.5%24	38.0%70	49.9%54	64.6%32	17.1%50	28.9%52
Darius Burford	1,141	613	65.0%	-1.146	109.852	110.840	53.5%60	34.0%62	18.8%34	41.9%78	50.4%50	64.6%32	17.1%50	31.3%44
Raysean Seamster	1,079	675	61.5%	-3.442	105.640	109.044	52.6%56	33.9%62	19.9%26	40.5%74	50.2%50	65.5%36	17.4%52	33.3%38
Jaden Wells	959	795	54.7%	-1.844	109.752	111.538	51.9%52	35.6%68	18.9%34	32.9%58	52.0%44	66.5%38	17.7%54	36.9%30
Brandyn Talbot	875	879	49.9%	-5.538	105.240	110.640	51.6%50	34.5%64	20.7%22	33.4%60	49.2%56	64.2%30	16.6%46	35.1%34
Diante Smith	659	1,095	37.6%	-3.342	109.150	112.436	52.6%56	39.6%80	20.9%22	35.1%64	48.9%58	64.1%30	15.0%34	41.7%20
Kade Douglas	549	1,204	31.3%	-1.544	106.644	108.146	54.7%64	29.7%46	20.4%24	41.9%78	48.0%62	66.6%38	14.6%32	30.8%44
Jaxon Ellingsworth	464	1,290	26.4%	-9.032	108.748	117.724	52.9%58	33.5%62	20.5%24	39.4%72	51.6%46	64.5%32	15.2%36	44.7%16
Troy Hupstead	241	1,513	13.7%	1.450	115.164	113.732	50.2%46	40.1%82	16.2%52	32.6%58	50.9%50	66.9%42	13.8%26	41.2%22
Cameron Jackson	128	1,625	7.3%	5.756	107.546	101.864	51.9%52	36.2%70	18.7%34	41.7%76	46.6%68	64.8%34	16.3%44	30.2%46

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Brody Robinson	1,352	401	77.1%	5.456	113.862	108.546	55.3%68	38.9%78	20.9%22	35.7%66	48.1%62	67.1%42	17.1%50	43.0%18
Lance Ware	1,262	492	71.9%	-2.244	113.260	115.430	54.2%62	34.8%66	18.1%38	37.0%68	51.4%46	65.9%38	14.7%32	47.6%14
Darius Burford	1,141	613	65.0%	-9.132	102.834	111.938	50.0%40	36.1%70	21.7%18	30.0%50	50.1%50	65.6%36	15.3%36	39.1%26
Raysean Seamster	1,079	675	61.5%	-4.640	110.152	114.730	51.8%52	36.0%70	19.6%28	33.4%60	50.6%50	64.2%30	14.9%34	35.0%34
Jaden Wells	959	795	54.7%	-6.336	104.438	110.740	52.7%56	33.6%62	20.9%22	43.9%80	48.5%60	63.5%28	14.9%34	30.7%46
Brandyn Talbot	875	879	49.9%	-2.344	109.550	111.738	52.9%56	35.0%66	18.9%34	41.9%78	51.5%46	65.8%36	16.3%44	32.8%40
Diante Smith	659	1,095	37.6%	-4.240	106.242	110.540	52.1%54	31.7%54	19.1%32	39.3%72	51.2%48	65.5%36	17.3%52	29.5%50
Kade Douglas	549	1,204	31.3%	-5.038	107.646	112.636	51.3%48	36.8%72	19.5%28	35.9%66	51.4%46	64.2%30	17.3%52	35.5%32
Jaxon Ellingsworth	464	1,290	26.4%	-2.044	106.844	108.846	52.0%54	35.2%68	19.5%28	37.1%68	49.9%54	65.1%34	16.9%48	30.2%46
Troy Hupstead	241	1,513	13.7%	-4.740	106.142	110.840	52.6%56	33.7%62	20.4%24	38.6%72	50.2%50	64.6%32	16.9%48	32.8%40
Cameron Jackson	128	1,625	7.3%	-4.640	107.346	111.936	52.3%54	34.6%64	19.9%26	37.4%68	50.6%50	65.0%34	16.5%44	34.3%36

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

UT ArlingtonUTA11-18

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

UT Arlington11-18