UTSA3-25

AmericanCoach: Austin Claunch

3-25NET#346

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jamir Simpson	1,712	233	88.0%	+7.478	+12.296	+4.822	+5.192	−3.222	−4.194	+6.382	−4.186	−3.122	−6.82	0.050
Dorian Hayes	1,279	665	65.8%	−13.510	−4.130	+9.48	−2.724	+0.354	+1.032	−5.622	+3.218	−3.818	−2.020	−7.786
Brent Moss	1,267	677	65.2%	+6.574	+6.784	+0.248	+1.972	+0.254	−2.484	−0.648	+1.334	+1.364	+2.184	+4.424
Baboucarr Njie	1,216	728	62.6%	+11.690	+5.882	−5.880	+0.658	+2.878	−1.776	+1.358	−1.666	−3.518	+3.294	+1.142
Austin Nunez	1,026	919	52.8%	−11.614	−7.716	+3.926	−3.022	−0.844	+2.414	+1.660	+5.18	+0.658	+1.880	+4.226
Matheo Coffi	932	1,013	47.9%	+1.356	+5.680	+4.324	+4.590	−0.844	−0.862	−9.78	+0.940	+5.292	−4.74	−8.388
Kaidon Rayfield	817	1,128	42.0%	+2.460	−4.030	−6.482	−2.724	+1.162	+0.542	+9.592	−4.690	−1.434	+0.764	−3.468
Daniel Akitoby	559	1,386	28.7%	+3.164	+3.670	+0.446	+2.374	+2.374	+0.344	−1.146	−1.262	−0.940	−1.526	−3.368
LJ Brown	337	1,608	17.3%	+3.564	+3.972	+0.446	+1.770	−1.934	−2.584	−1.344	−0.050	+1.364	+0.152	+4.724
Macaleab Rich	249	1,695	12.8%	−4.434	−11.38	−6.984	−0.742	−5.710	+5.70	+3.068	−1.666	+3.182	+2.688	+16.12
Mo Njie	246	1,698	12.7%	−9.120	−11.18	−2.060	−6.06	+0.556	+1.820	−4.328	+2.028	−0.446	+3.092	+3.032

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jamir Simpson	1,712	233	88.0%	-22.614	97.722	120.322	45.3%22	29.8%50	17.0%40	30.6%42	52.9%40	60.9%18	14.0%34	33.3%44
Dorian Hayes	1,279	665	65.8%	-28.210	94.818	123.016	43.8%16	30.3%52	17.8%34	27.9%36	54.4%34	59.9%14	14.1%34	30.8%54
Brent Moss	1,267	677	65.2%	-21.216	98.624	119.822	45.4%22	30.3%52	16.6%42	29.6%40	53.9%36	61.7%18	15.6%46	34.9%42
Baboucarr Njie	1,216	728	62.6%	-19.218	98.422	117.626	45.0%20	31.3%56	16.9%40	30.3%42	52.8%42	59.9%14	16.0%50	33.8%44
Austin Nunez	1,026	919	52.8%	-29.010	92.614	121.618	43.3%16	29.9%50	18.6%28	30.6%42	55.9%28	61.5%18	15.7%46	35.4%40
Matheo Coffi	932	1,013	47.9%	-22.814	99.224	122.018	47.0%26	29.8%50	17.1%40	24.8%26	53.8%38	63.9%26	12.4%24	29.1%58
Kaidon Rayfield	817	1,128	42.0%	-22.116	93.916	116.030	43.2%16	30.9%54	17.8%34	35.4%56	50.7%52	60.4%16	15.2%44	31.4%50
Daniel Akitoby	559	1,386	28.7%	-21.316	98.824	120.022	46.3%24	31.9%58	17.7%34	29.0%38	52.6%42	60.5%16	13.8%32	31.0%52
LJ Brown	337	1,608	17.3%	-20.616	99.526	120.122	46.2%24	28.6%46	15.4%52	28.8%38	53.4%40	62.2%20	14.9%40	37.2%36
Macaleab Rich	249	1,695	12.8%	-27.312	86.48	113.734	44.1%18	25.2%32	22.5%10	32.5%48	51.9%46	63.9%26	17.1%58	47.6%16
Mo Njie	246	1,698	12.7%	-31.510	86.68	118.026	39.5%8	30.7%52	19.1%26	26.0%30	55.1%32	60.8%16	17.4%60	36.0%38

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jamir Simpson	1,712	233	88.0%	-30.010	85.58	115.530	40.3%10	33.1%62	21.1%16	24.3%26	57.0%24	64.0%26	20.8%80	33.3%44
Dorian Hayes	1,279	665	65.8%	-14.724	98.924	113.634	46.5%24	30.1%52	16.8%40	33.5%52	51.3%48	63.7%26	16.2%50	38.5%32
Brent Moss	1,267	677	65.2%	-27.712	91.914	119.622	43.4%16	30.1%52	19.1%26	30.2%42	52.5%42	60.3%16	13.4%30	30.5%54
Baboucarr Njie	1,216	728	62.6%	-30.810	92.614	123.416	44.3%18	28.5%44	18.5%30	29.0%38	54.4%34	63.4%24	12.8%26	32.6%48
Austin Nunez	1,026	919	52.8%	-17.420	100.326	117.726	46.3%24	30.7%52	16.2%46	29.0%38	50.9%50	60.9%16	13.9%34	31.2%52
Matheo Coffi	932	1,013	47.9%	-24.114	93.516	117.726	42.5%14	30.7%52	17.9%34	34.6%54	53.0%40	58.6%12	17.1%58	37.4%36
Kaidon Rayfield	817	1,128	42.0%	-24.514	97.922	122.418	45.8%24	29.8%50	17.3%38	25.9%30	55.4%30	61.8%20	14.5%38	34.8%42
Daniel Akitoby	559	1,386	28.7%	-24.414	95.218	119.622	44.1%18	29.6%50	17.4%36	30.1%42	53.7%38	61.4%18	15.3%44	34.3%42
LJ Brown	337	1,608	17.3%	-24.114	95.518	119.722	44.4%18	30.6%52	17.9%34	30.0%42	53.4%40	60.9%18	14.8%40	32.5%48
Macaleab Rich	249	1,695	12.8%	-23.014	97.722	120.620	44.8%20	30.9%54	16.8%42	29.5%40	53.6%38	60.8%16	14.5%38	31.5%50
Mo Njie	246	1,698	12.7%	-22.416	97.622	120.022	45.5%22	30.2%52	17.3%38	30.4%42	53.1%40	61.2%18	14.5%38	33.0%46

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.