William & Mary18-12

CAACoach: Brian Earl

18-12NET#130

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi	1,472	697	67.9%	+6.574	+5.380	−1.256	+1.970	+2.676	−0.150	−1.542	+0.346	+4.590	−1.822	−8.488
Reese Miller	1,291	878	59.5%	−9.818	+1.458	+11.24	−0.050	−3.024	−1.876	+13.098	+4.710	−4.216	+1.272	+11.46
Kyle Pulliam	1,257	912	58.0%	−5.928	−2.636	+3.330	−1.040	+0.758	+2.316	+3.974	−2.978	−4.414	−2.614	−0.552
Chase Lowe	1,249	920	57.6%	+6.776	+5.278	−1.558	+1.466	+2.072	−0.658	−3.034	−1.768	+7.298	−4.84	−5.076
Kilian Brockhoff	1,205	965	55.5%	−5.230	−6.020	−0.854	−1.832	−2.032	+1.130	+0.856	+0.544	−4.414	+2.688	−4.976
Jo'el Emanuel	1,188	981	54.8%	+9.684	+7.486	−2.262	+5.594	−3.818	−1.370	+9.792	+1.334	−1.436	+3.796	+8.212
Ryan Jackson Jr.	966	1,203	44.6%	+9.786	+3.972	−5.880	+0.758	+0.960	−3.492	−5.922	+0.940	+5.494	+1.474	−2.564
Cade Haskins	941	1,228	43.4%	−8.222	−10.98	−2.764	−2.822	−1.240	+3.76	−13.94	+0.148	+2.778	+0.152	−7.586
Jhei-R Jones	739	1,431	34.0%	−4.334	−6.120	−1.860	−1.930	−0.150	+1.920	−4.130	−0.352	−6.46	+4.598	+8.212
Finn Lally	410	1,759	18.9%	−3.040	+4.978	+7.912	−0.446	+3.382	−2.786	−1.742	+1.632	+0.758	−4.24	+0.148
Kyle Frazier	104	2,065	4.8%	+15.796	−1.344	−17.098	−4.512	+0.456	−1.370	+12.798	−15.298	+2.980	−4.74	+0.546

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi	1,472	697	67.9%	6.658	113.156	106.552	54.9%62	27.0%38	16.6%44	43.7%74	52.0%46	69.9%48	18.4%66	32.7%46
Reese Miller	1,291	878	59.5%	0.646	112.054	111.440	54.3%60	24.9%28	15.9%48	49.6%82	53.9%36	66.7%38	19.5%74	40.1%28
Kyle Pulliam	1,257	912	58.0%	2.048	110.350	108.348	53.9%58	26.4%36	17.6%36	45.8%76	50.8%52	66.7%38	17.9%62	35.2%40
Chase Lowe	1,249	920	57.6%	7.458	113.658	106.252	54.9%62	27.0%38	16.3%46	42.9%72	51.2%50	71.3%56	17.0%56	33.4%44
Kilian Brockhoff	1,205	965	55.5%	2.350	108.744	106.552	53.5%56	25.3%32	17.1%38	44.5%74	52.1%44	66.4%32	20.2%78	33.1%46
Jo'el Emanuel	1,188	981	54.8%	8.962	114.860	105.954	56.9%72	24.3%28	16.0%48	48.7%80	52.5%42	67.8%40	20.6%78	39.2%32
Ryan Jackson Jr.	966	1,203	44.6%	9.962	113.658	103.760	54.7%62	26.7%36	14.7%58	41.0%68	52.4%44	71.4%56	19.8%74	34.0%44
Cade Haskins	941	1,228	43.4%	-0.146	105.236	105.354	52.7%52	25.5%32	18.7%28	36.3%58	52.0%46	70.0%50	19.0%70	31.1%52
Jhei-R Jones	739	1,431	34.0%	1.748	107.442	105.754	53.1%54	26.1%34	17.9%34	41.5%68	51.7%46	64.2%26	21.9%84	40.8%28
Finn Lally	410	1,759	18.9%	2.250	115.462	113.236	54.0%58	28.8%46	14.4%60	42.8%70	53.2%40	69.0%46	15.6%46	35.5%40
Kyle Frazier	104	2,065	4.8%	19.578	110.248	90.784	50.0%36	26.5%36	15.3%54	56.3%88	37.5%94	71.2%54	14.5%38	35.9%40

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi	1,472	697	67.9%	0.246	107.842	107.750	53.0%54	24.4%28	16.6%42	45.2%76	51.8%46	65.4%30	20.2%78	41.1%28
Reese Miller	1,291	878	59.5%	10.464	110.650	100.268	54.3%60	27.9%42	17.7%34	36.6%58	49.2%58	70.9%54	18.3%66	28.7%58
Kyle Pulliam	1,257	912	58.0%	8.060	113.056	105.056	54.9%62	25.7%32	15.2%54	41.9%70	53.6%38	71.1%54	20.5%78	35.7%40
Chase Lowe	1,249	920	57.6%	0.746	108.444	107.848	53.5%56	25.0%28	16.9%40	45.9%76	53.0%40	64.1%26	21.8%84	38.4%32
Kilian Brockhoff	1,205	965	55.5%	7.558	114.860	107.350	55.3%64	27.3%40	16.0%48	43.8%74	51.7%46	70.8%52	17.6%60	38.0%34
Jo'el Emanuel	1,188	981	54.8%	-0.744	107.442	108.148	51.4%46	28.1%42	17.3%38	39.0%64	51.2%50	69.2%46	16.9%56	31.0%52
Ryan Jackson Jr.	966	1,203	44.6%	0.246	109.748	109.544	54.0%58	25.7%32	18.1%32	46.9%78	51.5%48	66.1%32	18.4%66	36.5%38
Cade Haskins	941	1,228	43.4%	8.260	116.264	108.048	55.6%66	26.7%38	15.0%56	50.3%82	51.9%46	67.4%38	19.0%70	38.6%32
Jhei-R Jones	739	1,431	34.0%	6.056	113.558	107.550	55.0%62	26.2%34	15.9%48	45.6%76	52.0%46	70.6%52	17.4%60	32.6%48
Finn Lally	410	1,759	18.9%	5.154	110.550	105.454	54.4%60	25.5%32	17.1%38	44.5%74	51.6%48	68.3%42	19.8%74	35.3%40
Kyle Frazier	104	2,065	4.8%	3.852	111.552	107.750	54.5%60	26.1%34	16.7%42	43.6%72	52.7%42	68.3%42	19.2%72	35.3%40

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

William & MaryW&M18-12

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

William & Mary18-12