Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
CAA
William & Mary logo

William & Mary

20-12NET#127Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #263Coach: Brian Earl
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi+2.1+4.1+2.0+0.5+2.8−0.3−0.1+2.3+3.4−1.3−6.1
Reese Miller−13.3−1.2+12.0−0.6−4.5−1.3+11.3+4.4−5.4+0.6+10.7
Chase Lowe+5.6+4.9−0.7+0.8+3.0−0.5−3.9−0.8+7.1−4.1−3.7
Kyle Pulliam−5.8−1.9+3.9−1.0+1.3+2.2+2.5−2.2−5.0−2.0+0.5
Kilian Brockhoff−4.4−4.4−0.0−1.3−1.7+0.8−1.2+0.8−3.1+1.7−4.1
Jo'el Emanuel+5.9+5.1−0.8+5.0−5.3−1.1+9.0+1.0−2.8+3.1+8.2
Ryan Jackson Jr.+10.5+4.0−6.5+1.0+0.1−3.4−3.4−0.2+5.0+0.9−3.2
Cade Haskins−5.6−8.8−3.2−2.5−0.4+3.2−14.0−0.3+3.4−0.5−6.8
Jhei-R Jones−6.6−7.0−0.4−2.3−0.7+1.8−5.3+0.4−6.6+4.4+7.7
Finn Lally+1.1+7.2+6.1+1.4+3.2−2.4+0.9+0.3−1.3−3.2+1.3
Kyle Frazier+15.4−3.2−18.6−3.9+3.3+0.7+9.1−11.7+6.3−1.3−6.1

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi8.8114.5105.755.4%27.8%16.4%43.8%51.8%70.1%18.7%32.3%
Reese Miller2.5112.6110.054.9%25.0%15.9%48.7%52.9%66.7%19.4%38.9%
Chase Lowe10.5115.2104.755.5%28.2%16.2%42.2%50.7%71.9%17.4%32.8%
Kyle Pulliam5.5112.2106.754.7%27.5%17.4%44.9%50.1%66.9%18.3%34.5%
Kilian Brockhoff6.1111.1105.054.6%26.1%16.8%43.2%51.4%67.5%19.9%32.4%
Jo'el Emanuel10.8115.4104.657.6%24.3%16.0%48.2%51.5%67.6%20.5%38.2%
Ryan Jackson Jr.13.7115.2101.555.7%27.0%14.6%42.0%51.0%71.7%19.6%32.6%
Cade Haskins4.9108.1103.253.8%26.7%18.3%35.9%50.9%70.9%18.8%30.4%
Jhei-R Jones3.7108.4104.753.7%26.4%17.6%40.3%51.3%64.5%22.0%39.5%
Finn Lally9.0118.9109.956.3%29.5%14.5%44.5%51.3%68.0%16.6%35.4%
Kyle Frazier22.4110.187.851.5%30.0%17.1%52.3%40.2%74.7%17.9%28.7%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi6.6110.3103.754.8%25.1%16.7%43.9%49.5%66.7%20.0%38.4%
Reese Miller15.8113.898.055.5%29.5%17.3%37.4%48.5%72.0%18.8%28.2%
Chase Lowe4.8110.3105.454.7%25.2%16.8%46.1%51.5%64.8%21.5%36.5%
Kyle Pulliam11.3114.1102.855.7%26.2%15.2%42.4%52.3%71.9%20.2%34.1%
Kilian Brockhoff10.4115.5105.055.9%27.9%16.0%44.5%50.7%70.6%18.2%36.5%
Jo'el Emanuel4.9110.4105.552.6%29.6%17.1%39.1%50.5%70.4%17.5%30.0%
Ryan Jackson Jr.3.2111.3108.054.7%26.9%18.0%45.4%51.1%66.7%18.7%35.8%
Cade Haskins10.5116.8106.456.3%27.1%15.1%49.9%51.2%67.6%19.3%37.2%
Jhei-R Jones10.3115.5105.256.0%27.2%15.9%45.6%50.9%71.2%17.6%31.8%
Finn Lally7.8111.7103.854.9%26.3%16.9%43.6%51.0%69.2%19.7%34.1%
Kyle Frazier6.9113.3106.355.5%26.7%16.4%43.2%51.9%68.5%19.2%34.8%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.