Winthrop20-11

Big SouthCoach: Mark Prosser

20-11NET#139

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kareem Rozier	1,653	511	76.4%	+11.690	+15.5100	+3.926	+6.596	−1.042	−5.298	+2.566	+1.136	+4.188	−1.426	+12.24
Kody Clouet	1,640	524	75.8%	+18.798	+15.5100	−3.268	+6.698	+1.466	−2.686	+14.898	−5.792	+0.860	−3.110	−9.490
Logan Duncomb	1,333	831	61.6%	+0.754	+11.496	+10.76	+6.496	+1.062	−1.168	+2.264	+6.64	−3.520	+1.576	−2.464
Daylen Berry	1,113	1,051	51.4%	−8.920	−1.046	+7.912	−1.338	+0.254	−0.762	+2.968	+5.66	+0.758	−0.542	+1.044
Isaiah Wilson	1,053	1,111	48.7%	−3.438	−9.612	−6.282	−3.718	−1.834	+2.216	+7.286	−1.262	−1.038	+3.192	−5.478
Josh Meo	976	1,188	45.1%	+9.684	+4.274	−5.578	+1.972	−3.024	−1.674	+9.392	−2.776	+1.668	−1.426	+0.546
Tommy Kamarad	936	1,228	43.2%	−0.050	−1.044	−1.056	−1.732	+1.668	−0.152	−11.36	+1.830	+0.252	+2.990	+7.314
Seifeldin Hendawy	837	1,327	38.7%	+0.754	−4.328	−5.076	−0.150	+3.280	+3.96	−12.74	−6.696	−0.348	−2.416	−0.956
Ed Nnamoko	543	1,622	25.1%	−5.430	−9.312	−3.970	−4.712	−0.348	+1.428	−3.232	−1.262	+4.992	−1.724	+2.534
Pharrell Boyogueno	473	1,691	21.9%	−18.46	−9.712	+8.710	−6.76	−0.646	−0.150	−4.726	+6.74	−5.68	+3.092	+0.944
Tai Hamilton	199	1,965	9.2%	+8.982	−11.08	−20.098	−3.618	−1.934	+3.010	−3.930	−13.498	+1.768	−1.922	−4.976

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kareem Rozier	1,653	511	76.4%	6.858	116.064	109.246	50.7%42	33.9%66	13.6%66	44.4%74	51.9%46	73.0%64	16.3%50	41.5%26
Kody Clouet	1,640	524	75.8%	8.760	116.164	107.450	50.8%42	34.5%68	14.2%62	47.5%80	50.2%52	72.2%60	15.8%48	36.0%38
Logan Duncomb	1,333	831	61.6%	4.152	116.766	112.638	51.7%46	34.6%68	14.4%60	44.6%74	54.3%34	70.4%52	17.2%58	37.3%36
Daylen Berry	1,113	1,051	51.4%	-0.246	111.952	112.138	48.5%34	34.2%66	14.5%60	45.2%76	54.3%34	72.3%60	16.4%52	38.7%32
Isaiah Wilson	1,053	1,111	48.7%	2.450	107.542	105.156	47.2%28	33.2%62	15.9%48	47.6%80	51.0%50	71.5%58	18.2%66	35.5%40
Josh Meo	976	1,188	45.1%	9.462	114.760	105.354	50.2%42	32.5%60	13.9%64	49.0%82	50.1%52	72.8%62	15.9%48	38.5%32
Tommy Kamarad	936	1,228	43.2%	4.152	111.852	107.750	48.2%32	35.0%68	14.7%58	37.6%60	52.6%42	72.1%60	18.2%66	42.5%24
Seifeldin Hendawy	837	1,327	38.7%	4.654	109.748	105.254	49.1%36	36.1%74	17.2%38	36.1%58	47.7%66	71.8%58	15.2%42	37.8%34
Ed Nnamoko	543	1,622	25.1%	0.046	105.436	105.454	45.7%22	33.9%66	15.9%48	41.4%68	50.7%52	75.5%72	15.4%44	40.1%28
Pharrell Boyogueno	473	1,691	21.9%	-10.228	104.836	115.032	43.9%16	33.7%66	14.8%58	40.1%66	56.8%26	67.5%38	19.0%70	39.0%32
Tai Hamilton	199	1,965	9.2%	12.166	102.430	90.286	45.9%24	32.5%60	17.6%36	40.2%66	39.5%90	73.4%66	15.0%42	33.9%44

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kareem Rozier	1,653	511	76.4%	-4.838	100.526	105.354	44.2%18	34.9%68	18.8%28	41.9%70	50.7%52	69.0%46	17.7%62	29.3%56
Kody Clouet	1,640	524	75.8%	-10.030	100.626	110.642	44.2%18	33.1%62	16.8%42	32.7%48	55.8%28	71.4%56	18.9%70	45.4%20
Logan Duncomb	1,333	831	61.6%	3.452	105.436	102.064	45.2%22	33.5%66	15.5%52	42.5%70	47.7%66	73.9%68	15.8%48	39.7%30
Daylen Berry	1,113	1,051	51.4%	8.760	112.956	104.258	49.8%36	34.0%66	15.2%54	42.3%70	48.7%60	71.6%58	16.9%56	37.8%34
Isaiah Wilson	1,053	1,111	48.7%	5.856	117.066	111.340	50.9%44	35.0%70	13.8%66	40.4%66	52.1%44	72.5%62	15.1%42	40.9%28
Josh Meo	976	1,188	45.1%	-0.344	110.550	110.842	48.3%32	35.5%72	15.6%52	39.7%66	52.8%42	71.2%54	17.3%58	38.0%34
Tommy Kamarad	936	1,228	43.2%	4.252	112.856	108.746	50.0%36	33.4%66	14.9%58	48.9%82	50.8%50	71.9%58	15.4%44	35.2%40
Seifeldin Hendawy	837	1,327	38.7%	3.852	114.058	110.244	49.2%36	32.9%62	13.3%68	48.8%82	54.2%36	72.1%60	17.6%60	38.6%32
Ed Nnamoko	543	1,622	25.1%	5.454	114.760	109.344	50.4%42	34.2%66	14.5%60	44.6%74	51.9%46	70.6%52	17.1%58	37.6%34
Pharrell Boyogueno	473	1,691	21.9%	8.260	114.560	106.352	50.7%42	34.3%66	14.8%58	44.9%76	50.1%52	73.1%64	16.0%48	38.1%34
Tai Hamilton	199	1,965	9.2%	3.252	113.458	110.244	49.5%36	34.3%68	14.6%60	44.2%74	53.0%40	71.8%58	16.8%56	38.8%32

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.