Schedule
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
LL
LL
WW
WL
LL
LW
WL
W
W
L
LWWWWWWLLLLWWWLLLLWWLWWLTeam Stats
25 games- Net Rating1.559
- Offensive Rating109.058
- Defensive Rating107.550
- Pace70.385
- Effective FG%53.7%88
- Off Rebound Pct22.9%13
- Turnover Pct16.0%93
- FT Attempt Rate35.3%79
Team Stats
25 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating1.559
- Offensive Rating109.058
- Defensive Rating107.550
- Pace70.385
- Effective FG%53.7%88
- Off Rebound Pct22.9%13
- Turnover Pct16.0%93
- FT Attempt Rate35.3%79
Results & Margin
- Win Pct56.0%63
- Point Margin / Game1.160
- Points / Game76.688
- Points Allowed / Game75.518
- 1st Half Margin1.669
- 2nd Half Margin-0.645
- Avg Largest Lead12.676
- Avg Largest Deficit10.055
Box Score
- Points / Game76.688
- Rebounds / Game32.619
- Assists / Game14.073
- ORebs / Game8.118
- DRebs / Game24.537
- Steals / Game5.833
- Blocks / Game2.216
- Turnovers / Game11.288
- PFs / Game18.722
Shooting
- FGMs / Game26.066
- FGAs / Game57.750
- Field Goal Pct45.0%73
- 2PMs / Game15.916
- 2PAs / Game29.53
- 2-Point Pct53.9%90
- 3PMs / Game10.097
- 3PAs / Game28.298
- 3-Point Pct35.7%78
- FTMs / Game14.680
- FTAs / Game20.481
- Free Throw Pct71.9%59
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s41.6%1
- % Pts from 3s39.3%95
- % Pts from FTs19.1%62
- Paint Pts / Game15.533
- % Pts in Paint20.3%28
- Fast Break Pts / Game2.514
- % Pts on Fast Break3.2%11
- Points off TOVs / Game14.689
- % Pts off TOVs19.0%75
- 1st Half Pts / Game37.492
- 2nd Half Pts / Game38.070
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %57.5%90
- Points / Shot1.3395
- 3-Point Att Rate48.8%98
- Assist Pct54.1%69
- Assists / 100 Poss20.055
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.25x88
- PF Drawn / Game19.591
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%52.9%18
- Opp True Shooting %56.6%17
- Opp Field Goal Pct47.8%6
- Opp 2-Point Pct54.4%10
- Opp 3-Point Pct33.0%63
- Opp 3PA Rate31.1%95
- Opp FT Att Rate33.9%32
- Opp Points / Shot1.3016
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game75.518
- Paint Pts Allowed22.922
- Fast Break Pts Allowed4.562
- Pts off TOVs Allowed11.850
- Opp Assist Pct45.5%86
- TOVs Forced / Game12.843
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct72.2%52
- Turnovers Forced Pct18.2%23
- Steal Pct8.3%22
- Block Pct3.1%10
- Hakeem Pct11.3%9
- PF Efficiency0.96x64
- Steals / PF0.31x23
- Blocks / PF0.12x12
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 347 D-I teams- #53PM Diff+102
- #15PO TOV Diff+70
- #29TOV%16.0%
- #39TS%56.9%
- #42eFG%53.7%
- #76FTAR35.3%
- #773P%35.7%
- #85Adj ORtg107.4
Where they rank bestof 347 D-I teams
- #53PM Diff+102
- #15PO TOV Diff+70
- #29TOV%16.0%
- #39TS%56.9%
- #42eFG%53.7%
- #76FTAR35.3%
- #773P%35.7%
- #85Adj ORtg107.4
Where they rank worstof 347 D-I teams
- #303OREB%22.9%
- #302REB Diff-103
- #297Adj DRtg108.8
- #286Opp eFG%52.9%
- #252Paint Pts %32.6%
- #243FB Pts %5.5%
- #223Opp TOV%18.2%
- #216SOS-2.1
Most Similar Seasons
to 2020-21- 1
Rice 2019-2013-17C-USAMost alike in Tempo, Opp TOV%, 3PA rate87 - 2
Eastern WashingtonE. Washington 2015-1616-16Big SkyMost alike in 3PA rate, Opp OREB%, TOV%82 - 3
Iona 2018-1917-16MAACMost alike in FT rate, Adj D, Adj O81 - 4
Gardner Webb 2014-1516-15Big SouthMost alike in Adj D, Adj O, Opp OREB%80 - 5
PresbyterianPC 2018-1917-16Big SouthMost alike in Opp eFG%, Opp TOV%, Adj O80 - 6
North FloridaUNF 2014-1520-12ASUNMost alike in Adj O, Opp TOV%, eFG%79 - 7
Youngstown St.YSU 2013-1412-17HorizonMost alike in Opp eFG%, Adj O, eFG%78 - 8
Portland 2022-2312-19WCCMost alike in Adj O, eFG%, OREB%78 - 9
Bucknell 2018-1921-12PatriotMost alike in Adj O, Opp OREB%, Tempo78 - 10
Tennessee TechTenn. Tech 2015-1617-12OVCMost alike in Adj O, Tempo, Adj D77
Schedule
Loading the schedule
HunterThompsonJrDJDrakeJeffriesJrHMHunterMaldonadoJr
XavierDuSellFr
KennyFosterSo
MarcusWilliamsFrKIKwane MarbleIISo
GrahamIkeFrDLDrewLaMontJr
JGJohnGrigsbyFr
ENEoinNelsonSo
JeremiahOdenFr| H. ThompsonHunter Thompson | Jr | 6'10" | +0.466 | – | – | 58.4%72 | 13.8%23 | 7.0 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 35.8% | 75.0% |
| D. JeffriesDrake Jeffries | Jr | 6'5" | +0.466 | – | – | 56.9%66 | 14.2%25 | 7.4 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 36.9% | 88.2% |
| H. MaldonadoHunter Maldonado | Jr | 6'7" | +0.466 | – | – | 51.2%40 | 23.0%81 | 12.5 | 6.8 | 4.6 | 20.0% | 69.4% |
| X. DuSellXavier DuSell | Fr | 6'4" | +0.362 | – | – | 67.9%91 | 15.6%33 | 9.7 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 45.6% | 70.0% |
| K. FosterKenny Foster | So | 6'5" | +0.360 | – | – | 61.2%81 | 16.6%40 | 9.1 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 41.9% | 72.2% |
| M. WilliamsMarcus Williams | Fr | 6'2" | +0.255 | – | – | 55.9%61 | 27.4%94 | 14.8 | 2.5 | 4.3 | 33.0% | 70.5% |
| K. Marble IIKwane Marble II | So | 6'6" | +0.254 | – | – | 58.1%71 | 22.4%78 | 9.5 | 4.1 | 1.2 | 30.8% | 73.4% |
| G. IkeGraham Ike | Fr | 6'9" | -0.335 | – | – | 63.2%85 | 25.5%89 | 11.2 | 5.4 | 0.8 | 0.0% | 68.3% |
| D. LaMontDrew LaMont | Jr | 6'8" | – | – | – | 78.1%95 | 10.3%10 | 3.4 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| J. GrigsbyJohn Grigsby | Fr | 6'9" | – | – | – | 0.0%2 | 10.8%11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| E. NelsonEoin Nelson | So | 6'10" | – | – | – | 57.8%69 | 18.9%57 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| J. OdenJeremiah Oden | Fr | 6'8" | – | – | – | 48.8%31 | 17.0%42 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 24.1% | 85.7% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 18-15 | #94 | 7.175 | 114.978 | 107.962 | 2.973 | +12178 | +6084 | 34.5%82 | -1256 | 52.1%54 | 33.0%34 | 73.7%62 |
| 24-25 | 12-20 | #210 | -3.143 | 104.131 | 107.256 | 3.074 | +6362 | +2666 | 30.7%53 | +7710 | 50.6%40 | 34.2%53 | 65.2%3 |
| 23-24 | 15-17 | #172 | -1.451 | 107.857 | 109.236 | 2.571 | +3355 | -2132 | 29.1%49 | +4819 | 51.9%64 | 37.2%94 | 74.1%76 |
| 22-23 | 9-22 | #187 | -1.447 | 106.156 | 107.538 | 5.681 | -3032 | +2063 | 24.1%11 | +2529 | 52.0%66 | 34.9%61 | 71.1%43 |
| 21-2212 | 25-9 | #61 | 11.683 | 110.684 | 99.081 | 2.469 | +9574 | +4579 | 25.5%23 | +2234 | 53.1%83 | 34.2%55 | 72.5%57 |
| 19-20 | 9-24 | #261 | -7.425 | 93.86 | 101.260 | 3.774 | -2931 | +855 | 14.6%0 | -648 | 48.4%27 | 32.1%30 | 72.7%68 |
| 18-19 | 8-24 | #320 | -13.09 | 95.36 | 108.330 | 0.361 | -2351 | -1637 | 15.9%0 | +6812 | 49.2%25 | 34.4%51 | 72.3%67 |
| 17-18 | 20-13 | #118 | 4.067 | 105.449 | 101.480 | 3.876 | -1408 | +4479 | 19.2%1 | -3470 | 52.3%65 | 34.5%42 | 73.8%76 |
| 16-17 | 23-15 | #126 | 2.260 | 103.143 | 100.973 | -0.361 | -5528 | +11296 | 22.8%6 | +3831 | 51.2%55 | 34.6%44 | 73.1%76 |
| 15-16 | 12-18 | #173 | -0.352 | 107.466 | 107.731 | 1.769 | -1925 | +8094 | 17.8%0 | +1142 | 54.1%92 | 37.2%84 | 71.6%68 |
| 14-1512 | 23-10 | #110 | 4.166 | 103.353 | 99.272 | -0.953 | -343 | -1042 | 22.3%2 | +1540 | 52.6%86 | 32.6%28 | 70.2%61 |
| 13-14 | 16-15 | #112 | 3.965 | 105.248 | 101.375 | 1.566 | -13911 | -744 | 18.7%0 | +347 | 53.4%88 | 35.1%59 | 71.6%67 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
56.9%#36
Effective FG %
53.7%#42
3-Point %
35.7%#76
3PAR
48.8%#9
FTAR
35.3%#75
Assist %
54.1%#108
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
34.1%#175
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
17.6%#15
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
9 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot1.19100D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s1.005827.9% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.319645.5% of shots
Late 21s+1.189226.5% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0244Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.907335.1% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.084341.2% of shots
Late 21s+1.091523.7% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 334 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 20-21. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 20-21. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.