Schedule
W
L
W
WW
W
W
W
WL
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
WW
L
L
WLWWLWLLWLR1L
LWWWWWWWLWWLWWWWWLWWLLWLWWLWLLWLR1LTeam Stats
33 games- Net Rating9.583
- Offensive Rating113.566
- Defensive Rating104.075
- Pace67.263
- Effective FG%51.6%73
- Off Rebound Pct40.0%99
- Turnover Pct18.8%57
- FT Attempt Rate38.6%68
Team Stats
33 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating9.583
- Offensive Rating113.566
- Defensive Rating104.075
- Pace67.263
- Effective FG%51.6%73
- Off Rebound Pct40.0%99
- Turnover Pct18.8%57
- FT Attempt Rate38.6%68
Results & Margin
- Win Pct63.6%77
- Point Margin / Game6.483
- Points / Game76.377
- Points Allowed / Game69.967
- 1st Half Margin2.372
- 2nd Half Margin4.192
- Avg Largest Lead13.881
- Avg Largest Deficit9.461
Box Score
- Points / Game76.377
- Rebounds / Game36.664
- Assists / Game17.198
- ORebs / Game13.696
- DRebs / Game23.113
- Steals / Game7.894
- Blocks / Game3.970
- Turnovers / Game12.651
- PFs / Game19.547
Shooting
- FGMs / Game26.981
- FGAs / Game58.260
- Field Goal Pct46.3%85
- 2PMs / Game20.791
- 2PAs / Game41.690
- 2-Point Pct49.8%65
- 3PMs / Game6.227
- 3PAs / Game16.59
- 3-Point Pct37.4%86
- FTMs / Game16.378
- FTAs / Game22.570
- Free Throw Pct72.5%76
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s54.4%85
- % Pts from 3s24.3%16
- % Pts from FTs21.3%63
- Paint Pts / Game6.55
- % Pts in Paint8.5%4
- Fast Break Pts / Game1.39
- % Pts on Fast Break1.7%8
- Points off TOVs / Game4.69
- % Pts off TOVs6.1%8
- 1st Half Pts / Game35.270
- 2nd Half Pts / Game39.976
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %56.0%78
- Points / Shot1.3178
- 3-Point Att Rate28.4%9
- Assist Pct63.4%97
- Assists / 100 Poss25.490
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.35x89
- PF Drawn / Game19.964
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%51.2%33
- Opp True Shooting %55.4%30
- Opp Field Goal Pct45.0%30
- Opp 2-Point Pct49.1%46
- Opp 3-Point Pct36.9%18
- Opp 3PA Rate33.8%69
- Opp FT Att Rate38.6%39
- Opp Points / Shot1.3031
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game69.967
- Paint Pts Allowed3.898
- Fast Break Pts Allowed0.794
- Pts off TOVs Allowed3.892
- Opp Assist Pct72.3%0
- TOVs Forced / Game13.471
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct71.2%65
- Turnovers Forced Pct20.0%63
- Steal Pct11.5%87
- Block Pct5.8%64
- Hakeem Pct17.4%85
- PF Efficiency0.98x61
- Steals / PF0.40x94
- Blocks / PF0.20x68
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 351 D-I teams- #4OREB%40.0%
- #10AST%63.4%
- #11SOS10.8
- #13Adj ORtg117.8
- #22REB Diff+228
- #473P%37.4%
- #61Pts Diff+210
- #65Opp TOV%20.0%
Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
- #4OREB%40.0%
- #10AST%63.4%
- #11SOS10.8
- #13Adj ORtg117.8
- #22REB Diff+228
- #473P%37.4%
- #61Pts Diff+210
- #65Opp TOV%20.0%
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
- #286Opp 3P%36.9%
- #234Opp eFG%51.2%
- #2243PM Diff-18
- #220TOV%18.8%
- #122Opp OREB%28.8%
- #113FTAR38.6%
- #101Adj DRtg100.5
- #95eFG%51.6%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2015-16- 1
PittsburghPitt 2013-1426-10ACCMost alike in Tempo, 3PA rate, Adj O79 - 2
SMU 2015-1625-5AmericanMost alike in TOV%, Adj O, Opp OREB%78 - 3
Miami FL 2025-2626-9ACCMost alike in FT rate, 3PA rate, Opp TOV%76 - 4
Providence 2022-2321-12Big EastMost alike in Opp OREB%, Adj O, Adj D76 - 5
ConnecticutUConn 2020-2115-8Big EastMost alike in OREB%, Adj O, Adj D75 - 6PittsburghPitt 2015-1620-12ACCMost alike in eFG%, Tempo, Adj O74
- 7ConnecticutUConn 2021-2223-10Big EastMost alike in Tempo, OREB%, Opp OREB%73
- 8
Illinois 2019-2021-10Big 10Most alike in Tempo, 3PA rate, FT rate72 - 9
Cincinnati 2018-1928-7AmericanMost alike in OREB%, 3PA rate, Adj O71 - 10
Mississippi St.Miss. St. 2021-2218-16SECMost alike in Tempo, TOV%, 3PA rate71
Schedule
Loading the schedule
IWIshmailWainrightJrRGRicoGathersSrLMLesterMedfordSr
TaureanPrinceSr
JohnathanMotleySoAFAlFreemanSo
KingMcClureFr
JakeLindseyFrTMTerryMastonSo
TaureanPrinceSrJohnathanMotleySoAFAlFreemanSoAMAustinMillsSr
JHJohnHeardSr
KingMcClureFrJakeLindseyFr| I. WainrightIshmail Wainright | Jr | 6'5" | +2.299 | – | – | 53.8%59 | 14.4%24 | 5.8 | 4.3 | 2.5 | 41.5% | 73.0% |
| R. GathersRico Gathers | Sr | 6'8" | +2.299 | – | – | 54.4%61 | 22.4%78 | 10.9 | 9.1 | 0.5 | 100.0% | 63.4% |
| L. MedfordLester Medford | Sr | 5'10" | +2.299 | – | – | 53.7%58 | 18.1%49 | 9.2 | 2.2 | 6.3 | 37.8% | 75.3% |
| T. PrinceTaurean Prince | Sr | 6'8" | +1.896 | – | – | 54.2%60 | 27.2%94 | 16.0 | 5.9 | 2.3 | 36.1% | 76.9% |
| J. MotleyJohnathan Motley | So | 6'9" | +1.594 | – | – | 62.3%91 | 23.6%83 | 10.7 | 5.1 | 0.8 | 0.0% | 61.4% |
| A. FreemanAl Freeman | So | 6'3" | +1.391 | – | – | 56.2%70 | 17.5%45 | 11.3 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 38.1% | 85.0% |
| A. MillsAustin Mills | Sr | 6'1" | – | – | – | 59.5%84 | 16.9%41 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 25.0% | 100.0% |
| J. HeardJohn Heard | Sr | 6'5" | – | – | – | 40.3%15 | 19.2%57 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 25.0% | 100.0% |
| K. McClureKing McClure | Fr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 59.2%83 | 14.0%21 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 38.9% | 66.7% |
| J. LindseyJake Lindsey | Fr | 6'5" | – | – | – | 46.2%27 | 13.4%18 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 21.4% | 68.2% |
| T. MastonTerry Maston | So | 6'7" | – | – | – | 62.8%92 | 22.7%79 | 6.1 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 82.0% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 17-17 | #49 | 14.587 | 122.393 | 107.864 | 10.990 | +16387 | +2565 | 37.2%95 | +843 | 54.2%79 | 33.9%48 | 73.5%61 |
| 24-259 | 20-15 | #30 | 18.691 | 120.295 | 101.784 | 13.696 | +11976 | +1154 | 36.6%95 | -6279 | 51.4%52 | 34.8%63 | 74.7%77 |
| 23-243 | 24-11 | #15 | 20.996 | 123.399 | 102.375 | 10.797 | +20493 | +6386 | 35.7%95 | +342 | 55.8%96 | 38.9%98 | 73.2%67 |
| 22-233 | 23-11 | #17 | 17.996 | 119.399 | 101.475 | 11.199 | +6965 | +8994 | 34.4%93 | -4774 | 53.2%82 | 36.8%88 | 74.4%79 |
| 21-221 | 27-7 | #5 | 25.499 | 117.097 | 91.797 | 9.895 | +16389 | +6787 | 36.3%98 | -11894 | 52.8%79 | 34.3%58 | 69.7%31 |
| 19-20 | 26-4 | #7 | 21.798 | 111.793 | 90.099 | 8.893 | +10478 | +5484 | 35.7%97 | -9993 | 49.4%41 | 35.1%75 | 69.0%30 |
| 18-199 | 20-14 | #42 | 13.687 | 113.292 | 99.678 | 9.892 | +19293 | +2866 | 37.9%99 | +2532 | 51.2%54 | 34.1%42 | 67.7%18 |
| 17-18 | 19-15 | #35 | 14.791 | 112.883 | 98.192 | 8.990 | +19693 | -4321 | 35.6%97 | +6214 | 52.5%67 | 35.5%57 | 73.6%74 |
| 16-173 | 27-8 | #21 | 22.195 | 116.494 | 94.295 | 11.696 | +30699 | +855 | 40.5%100 | +7212 | 53.0%78 | 35.9%62 | 72.3%70 |
| 15-165 | 21-12 | #29 | 16.992 | 117.896 | 100.971 | 10.095 | +25895 | -2333 | 40.2%99 | -3266 | 51.8%71 | 36.7%79 | 72.5%79 |
| 14-153 | 23-10 | #13 | 20.096 | 112.793 | 92.695 | 9.595 | +28199 | +4079 | 42.4%100 | +2432 | 49.7%57 | 37.7%85 | 67.4%31 |
| 13-146 | 24-12 | #28 | 17.092 | 117.696 | 100.678 | 9.395 | +25497 | +2262 | 40.6%99 | +4622 | 52.1%78 | 38.6%90 | 68.1%31 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
55.4%#75
Effective FG %
51.6%#95
3-Point %
37.4%#46
3PAR
28.4%#321
FTAR
38.6%#112
Assist %
63.4%#10
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
34.6%#201
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
37.2%#318
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
11 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0476D-I 0.99
Early 0–10s0.767353.7% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.408822.4% of shots
Late 21s+1.317823.9% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0242Allowed, D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.687151.2% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.41826.7% of shots
Late 21s+1.321822.2% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 344 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 15-16. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 15-16. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.