Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
America East
Binghamton logo

Binghamton

10-19NET#336Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #297Coach: Tommy Dempsey
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
LCornell logoLMichigan St. logoLColumbia logoWSacred Heart logoWNJIT logoWArmy logoWSOLLoyola MD logoLColgate logoWBoston University logoLYoungstown St. logoLPittsburgh logoWHALAlbany logoWUMBC logoLUMass Lowell logoLVermont logoLMaine logoWStony Brook logoLNew Hampshire logoLHALAlbany logoLMaine logoLStony Brook logoLVermont logoWUMass Lowell logoLHAWUMBC logoLNew Hampshire logo

Team Stats

29 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-11.58
  • Offensive Rating111.863
  • Defensive Rating123.38
  • Pace62.125
  • Effective FG%48.9%35
  • Off Rebound Pct25.7%30
  • Turnover Pct19.9%54
  • FT Attempt Rate23.8%3

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct34.5%18
  • Point Margin / Game-7.19
  • Points / Game69.435
  • Points Allowed / Game76.68
  • 1st Half Margin-5.16
  • 2nd Half Margin-2.018
  • Avg Largest Lead8.520
  • Avg Largest Deficit15.78

Box Score

  • Points / Game69.435
  • Rebounds / Game34.945
  • Assists / Game11.720
  • ORebs / Game9.642
  • DRebs / Game25.346
  • Steals / Game5.216
  • Blocks / Game3.047
  • Turnovers / Game12.372
  • PFs / Game16.572

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game24.735
  • FGAs / Game60.381
  • Field Goal Pct41.0%12
  • 2PMs / Game15.17
  • 2PAs / Game31.49
  • 2-Point Pct48.2%29
  • 3PMs / Game9.695
  • 3PAs / Game28.998
  • 3-Point Pct33.1%45
  • FTMs / Game10.48
  • FTAs / Game14.45
  • Free Throw Pct72.4%65

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s43.6%6
  • % Pts from 3s41.4%98
  • % Pts from FTs15.0%7
  • Paint Pts / Game10.78
  • % Pts in Paint15.4%9
  • Fast Break Pts / Game3.111
  • % Pts on Fast Break4.5%12
  • Points off TOVs / Game9.619
  • % Pts off TOVs13.9%20
  • 1st Half Pts / Game31.729
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game37.352

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %52.1%25
  • Points / Shot1.1510
  • 3-Point Att Rate47.9%97
  • Assist Pct47.3%21
  • Assists / 100 Poss18.829
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.95x38
  • PF Drawn / Game14.42

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%53.3%9
  • Opp True Shooting %55.8%19
  • Opp Field Goal Pct46.7%10
  • Opp 2-Point Pct54.2%7
  • Opp 3-Point Pct34.6%27
  • Opp 3PA Rate38.4%42
  • Opp FT Att Rate30.3%63
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2727

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game76.68
  • Paint Pts Allowed12.689
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed3.885
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed12.444
  • Opp Assist Pct51.7%47
  • TOVs Forced / Game9.81

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct68.4%11
  • Turnovers Forced Pct16.1%3
  • Steal Pct8.4%20
  • Block Pct4.9%53
  • Hakeem Pct13.3%25
  • PF Efficiency1.23x8
  • Steals / PF0.32x27
  • Blocks / PF0.18x52

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
  • #843PM Diff+46
  • #96TOV%17.9%
  • #1983P%33.1%
  • #211Opp 3P%33.5%
  • #232eFG%48.9%
  • #250Adj ORtg99.0
  • #254SOS-4.4
  • #261OREB%25.7%
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
  • #353Opp TOV%14.3%
  • #344FTAR23.8%
  • #344Adj DRtg115.1
  • #319Pts Diff-207
  • #319REB Diff-123
  • #311Opp OREB%31.0%
  • #305Opp eFG%51.9%
  • #279AST%47.3%
Game Log
Loading game log…
S. SessomsSo6'0"+0.76650.9%3732.1%9819.45.04.832.0%82.6%
G. TinsleyFr6'6"+0.45152.7%4617.0%4311.67.41.833.3%72.0%
P. SarrSr6'8"+0.44849.0%2922.2%789.17.41.026.7%72.4%
R. Caldwell Jr.Sr6'4"-0.12454.0%5317.3%457.93.61.031.5%70.3%
B. MillsFr6'3"-0.6751.9%4216.3%389.73.71.232.8%76.5%
H. HjalmarssonFr6'3"-0.7555.5%6014.5%264.41.11.041.5%66.7%
L. GallagherSo5'10"116.0%9911.9%131.00.30.50.0%50.0%
J. BrownJr6'5"48.3%2620.3%672.81.30.238.9%52.4%
Y. WillisSo7'0"46.7%2116.0%362.51.80.40.0%56.5%
D. PetcashFr6'4"83.8%9611.3%113.11.50.431.3%100.0%
A. AthuaiFr6'11"79.4%9516.1%360.91.10.10.0%33.3%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Binghamton logo25-268-23#358-22.6299.16121.82-11.02-7620-86421.8%1+103351.1%4232.7%3074.5%74
Binghamton logo24-2515-17#312-11.714100.513112.224-8.44+9574-34627.6%28+141152.7%7235.9%8169.3%24
Binghamton logo23-2415-15#242-5.433104.439109.832-3.242+15791-69530.0%58+85750.8%4730.6%1066.7%9
Binghamton logo22-2313-18#297-9.51899.316108.829-4.223+4055-312128.8%47+68949.9%3632.3%2271.3%46
Binghamton logo21-2212-17#275-8.22397.916106.137-5.620+2253+75427.4%41+441850.4%5235.4%7866.1%7
Binghamton logo19-2010-19#336-16.1599.030115.13-4.430-1238+468025.7%26+71748.9%3533.1%4672.4%65
Binghamton logo18-1910-23#326-14.3897.513111.811-3.730-2063-243221.7%3+282950.5%4434.9%5864.4%5
Binghamton logo17-1811-20#282-9.720101.325111.020-5.812-203505226.0%22+83951.0%4935.0%5164.0%2
Binghamton logo16-1712-20#287-10.11898.116108.230-5.415-622504823.4%8+243450.8%5036.2%6770.5%55
Binghamton logo15-168-22#321-14.4988.91103.359-4.225-8622-332525.2%12+491744.3%228.5%268.2%30
Binghamton logo14-155-25#325-16.0791.44107.421-2.738-1329-67726.5%11+143945.0%730.9%1266.0%20
Binghamton logo13-147-23#336-18.2492.91111.119-5.021-10413-62729.1%26+342443.9%132.0%1769.3%46

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
51.7%#257
Effective FG %
48.9%#229
3-Point %
33.1%#192
3PAR
47.9%#12
FTAR
23.8%#344
Assist %
47.3%#279

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
28.3%#317
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
23.7%#100
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

24 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 38.3% of shots at 1.00 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0938.3%1.00Middle (11–20s): 35.1% of shots at 1.04 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0435.1%1.04Late (21s+): 26.6% of shots at 0.93 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9726.6%0.93SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 41.0% of shots at 1.03 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0741.0%1.03Middle (11–20s): 36.5% of shots at 1.06 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0236.5%1.06Late (21s+): 22.5% of shots at 0.97 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9522.5%0.97SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

24 games
Created byFinished by
Sam Sessoms → Pierre Sarr: 27 assisted baskets (13 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 12 from three)Sam Sessoms → George Tinsley: 32 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 26 from three)Sam Sessoms → Brenton Mills: 20 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 15 from three)Sam Sessoms → Richard Caldwell Jr.: 11 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 8 from three)Sam Sessoms → Hakon Hjalmarsson: 12 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 12 from three)Sam Sessoms → Dan Petcash: 8 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 5 from three)Sam Sessoms → Yarden Willis: 6 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)George Tinsley → Pierre Sarr: 6 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 2 from three)George Tinsley → Brenton Mills: 10 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 9 from three)George Tinsley → Richard Caldwell Jr.: 12 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 7 from three)George Tinsley → Sam Sessoms: 7 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)Brenton Mills → Pierre Sarr: 6 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 4 from three)Brenton Mills → Richard Caldwell Jr.: 7 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Hakon Hjalmarsson → George Tinsley: 6 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 2 from three)Sessoms116 astTinsley35 astMills13 astHjalmarssonSarr39 madeTinsley38 madeMills30 madeCaldwell Jr.30 madeHjalmarsson12 madePetcashSessomsWillis
Sessoms is the least-assisted finisher — 80% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 19-20. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 19-20. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.