Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Southern
VMI logo

VMI

6-24NET#329Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #300Coach: Dan Earl
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
LRichmond logoWSVLVirginia Tech logoLPresbyterian logoLCampbell logoLRadford logoLGardner Webb logoLWest Virginia logoWCharleston Southern logoWFSLDayton logoLEast Tennessee St. logoLMercer logoLThe Citadel logoWWestern Carolina logoLUNC Greensboro logoLWofford logoLFurman logoWChattanooga logoLSamford logoLEast Tennessee St. logoLMercer logoWThe Citadel logoLFurman logoLChattanooga logoLSamford logoLWofford logoLUNC Greensboro logoLWestern Carolina logoLSamford logo

Team Stats

30 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-14.36
  • Offensive Rating101.515
  • Defensive Rating115.820
  • Pace67.552
  • Effective FG%48.1%17
  • Off Rebound Pct26.6%24
  • Turnover Pct19.5%48
  • FT Attempt Rate28.1%6

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct20.0%3
  • Point Margin / Game-9.65
  • Points / Game68.619
  • Points Allowed / Game78.214
  • 1st Half Margin-5.55
  • 2nd Half Margin-4.27
  • Avg Largest Lead7.011
  • Avg Largest Deficit17.46

Box Score

  • Points / Game68.619
  • Rebounds / Game33.014
  • Assists / Game11.921
  • ORebs / Game10.245
  • DRebs / Game22.88
  • Steals / Game6.354
  • Blocks / Game3.869
  • Turnovers / Game13.244
  • PFs / Game19.827

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game24.424
  • FGAs / Game59.370
  • Field Goal Pct41.2%11
  • 2PMs / Game16.110
  • 2PAs / Game33.113
  • 2-Point Pct48.8%39
  • 3PMs / Game8.374
  • 3PAs / Game26.295
  • 3-Point Pct31.6%8
  • FTMs / Game11.57
  • FTAs / Game16.76
  • Free Throw Pct69.0%39

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s47.1%27
  • % Pts from 3s36.2%89
  • % Pts from FTs16.8%11
  • Paint Pts / Game18.236
  • % Pts in Paint26.5%41
  • Fast Break Pts / Game3.137
  • % Pts on Fast Break4.5%41
  • Points off TOVs / Game11.954
  • % Pts off TOVs17.4%63
  • 1st Half Pts / Game31.419
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game37.136

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %51.5%12
  • Points / Shot1.168
  • 3-Point Att Rate44.2%94
  • Assist Pct48.6%25
  • Assists / 100 Poss17.615
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.90x22
  • PF Drawn / Game16.34

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%56.7%1
  • Opp True Shooting %59.6%2
  • Opp Field Goal Pct49.3%1
  • Opp 2-Point Pct54.2%6
  • Opp 3-Point Pct40.7%1
  • Opp 3PA Rate36.7%45
  • Opp FT Att Rate39.7%24
  • Opp Points / Shot1.403

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game78.214
  • Paint Pts Allowed26.613
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed4.531
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed15.67
  • Opp Assist Pct55.1%27
  • TOVs Forced / Game12.537

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct67.7%15
  • Turnovers Forced Pct18.7%37
  • Steal Pct9.3%50
  • Block Pct5.6%63
  • Hakeem Pct14.9%57
  • PF Efficiency1.30x2
  • Steals / PF0.32x47
  • Blocks / PF0.19x60

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 135 D-I teams
  • #120PO TOV Diff-101
  • #155SOS-0.9
  • #1713PM Diff+4
  • #189Opp TOV%18.6%
  • #197TOV%18.8%
  • #204FB Pts %6.3%
  • #235Paint Pts %36.0%
  • #249OREB%27.4%
Where they rank worstof 135 D-I teams
  • #343Opp eFG%55.5%
  • #342Opp 3P%39.6%
  • #331Pts Diff-289
  • #330FTAR28.1%
  • #326Adj DRtg113.3
  • #3243P%31.6%
  • #312REB Diff-135
  • #308TS%51.0%
Game Log
Loading game log…
QJ PetersonSr6'0"+1.07454.4%5231.7%9819.66.52.436.9%71.0%
J. ElebySr6'3"+0.44353.0%4521.8%7512.95.12.232.3%76.1%
T. ChapmanSr6'6"+0.33754.4%5119.6%619.65.30.825.5%67.0%
K. SmithFr6'0"+0.02752.5%4315.2%304.81.51.931.7%68.8%
A. BranchJr6'6"-0.21849.4%2925.0%887.83.50.440.0%64.5%
A. RichSo6'2"-0.31650.7%3414.9%286.51.22.031.3%83.3%
F. IruafemiJr6'6"62.7%869.7%71.82.10.50.0%45.5%
W. WeetheeSo6'6"0.0%113.6%200.00.30.00.0%0.0%
A. VereenSo6'4"35.0%813.2%181.21.10.325.0%66.7%
G. GilkesonFr6'4"33.4%716.1%361.91.80.920.8%71.4%
C. EnechionyiaFr6'7"27.1%522.2%770.61.40.20.0%33.3%
M. LarssonFr6'4"0.0%10.00.00.00.0%0.0%
W. MillerFr6'8"57.9%6912.7%162.41.30.516.7%47.6%
T. CreammerFr6'10"47.6%2313.0%171.21.30.10.0%57.1%
K. DengFr6'6"0.0%10.00.00.00.0%0.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
VMI logo25-266-26#355-21.73100.810122.51-6.321-2301+377426.5%10-326949.0%1632.9%3372.3%47
VMI logo24-2515-19#290-9.620102.623112.224-5.818-5223-123828.3%34-185850.4%3632.5%2676.1%87
VMI logo23-244-28#358-22.5191.11113.68-3.340-8018-83425.2%17+132147.7%1631.2%1369.2%19
VMI logo22-237-25#344-15.45101.427116.91-2.740+4757-342030.4%64+72749.6%3135.1%6776.6%93
VMI logo21-2216-16#1551.156111.688110.515-1.950-1041+819424.5%16+392456.4%9838.1%9779.2%99
VMI logo19-209-24#242-5.732101.341107.021-3.138-746+1229827.9%46-115551.8%7535.5%8270.8%48
VMI logo18-1911-21#302-11.014102.635113.660.463-1278+337223.2%7-205950.9%5035.9%7273.0%72
VMI logo17-189-21#334-17.1592.12109.232-3.528-11111-223525.7%20+322346.3%532.0%974.0%79
VMI logo16-176-24#329-16.1697.114113.37-0.957-13510+45227.4%30+64448.1%1831.6%869.0%39
VMI logo15-166-21#316-13.81097.113110.914-2.737-1687+398126.0%15+44748.6%3233.6%3472.3%77
VMI logo14-159-19#264-7.72599.933107.521-3.926-8418+18810032.7%66-568648.2%3731.7%1968.4%41
VMI logo13-1418-13#202-2.543109.472111.914-6.411-3235+939534.0%74-808951.0%6532.5%2471.3%62

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
51.0%#306
Effective FG %
48.1%#288
3-Point %
31.6%#321
3PAR
44.2%#22
FTAR
28.1%#330
Assist %
48.6%#263

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
26.4%#332
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
28.8%#184
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

21 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 50.5% of shots at 0.62 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0950.5%0.62Middle (11–20s): 32.4% of shots at 1.31 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0432.4%1.31Late (21s+): 17.1% of shots at 1.20 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9717.1%1.20SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 44.8% of shots at 0.81 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0744.8%0.81Middle (11–20s): 29.8% of shots at 1.39 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0229.8%1.39Late (21s+): 25.3% of shots at 1.37 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9525.3%1.37SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

21 games
Created byFinished by
QJ Peterson → Julian Eleby: 11 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 10 from three)QJ Peterson → Trey Chapman: 7 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 2 from three)QJ Peterson → Adrian Rich: 6 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 5 from three)QJ Peterson → Armani Branch: 11 assisted baskets (7 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 3 from three)QJ Peterson → Fred Iruafemi: 6 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 0 from three)Adrian Rich → Julian Eleby: 15 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 15 from three)Adrian Rich → Trey Chapman: 7 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 1 from three)Adrian Rich → QJ Peterson: 8 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 8 from three)Keith Smith → Julian Eleby: 10 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 10 from three)Keith Smith → Trey Chapman: 8 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 2 from three)Keith Smith → QJ Peterson: 7 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 7 from three)Julian Eleby → Trey Chapman: 6 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 1 from three)Julian Eleby → QJ Peterson: 10 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 9 from three)Julian Eleby → Adrian Rich: 6 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 6 from three)Peterson41 astRich30 astSmith25 astEleby22 astEleby36 madeChapman28 madePeterson25 madeRich12 madeBranch11 madeIruafemi
Eleby is the least-assisted finisher — 95% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 16-17. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 16-17. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.