Team Stats
30 games- Net Rating-6.324
- Offensive Rating104.633
- Defensive Rating110.935
- Pace67.267
- Effective FG%50.4%62
- Off Rebound Pct26.7%40
- Turnover Pct19.3%63
- FT Attempt Rate21.8%1
Team Stats
30 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating-6.324
- Offensive Rating104.633
- Defensive Rating110.935
- Pace67.267
- Effective FG%50.4%62
- Off Rebound Pct26.7%40
- Turnover Pct19.3%63
- FT Attempt Rate21.8%1
Results & Margin
- Win Pct20.0%7
- Point Margin / Game-4.223
- Points / Game70.349
- Points Allowed / Game74.519
- 1st Half Margin-1.928
- 2nd Half Margin-2.322
- Avg Largest Lead8.430
- Avg Largest Deficit11.042
Box Score
- Points / Game70.349
- Rebounds / Game35.154
- Assists / Game15.897
- ORebs / Game9.952
- DRebs / Game25.251
- Steals / Game6.249
- Blocks / Game2.422
- Turnovers / Game12.956
- PFs / Game18.631
Shooting
- FGMs / Game25.258
- FGAs / Game60.586
- Field Goal Pct41.6%25
- 2PMs / Game14.53
- 2PAs / Game29.93
- 2-Point Pct48.6%42
- 3PMs / Game10.699
- 3PAs / Game30.6100
- 3-Point Pct34.8%73
- FTMs / Game9.31
- FTAs / Game13.21
- Free Throw Pct70.5%45
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s41.4%2
- % Pts from 3s45.4%100
- % Pts from FTs13.2%1
- Paint Pts / Game21.161
- % Pts in Paint30.1%59
- Fast Break Pts / Game6.563
- % Pts on Fast Break9.3%62
- Points off TOVs / Game11.748
- % Pts off TOVs16.7%47
- 1st Half Pts / Game32.849
- 2nd Half Pts / Game36.139
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %53.0%45
- Points / Shot1.1618
- 3-Point Att Rate50.6%99
- Assist Pct62.6%99
- Assists / 100 Poss23.589
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.22x89
- PF Drawn / Game14.94
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%50.8%32
- Opp True Shooting %55.6%21
- Opp Field Goal Pct44.3%35
- Opp 2-Point Pct52.3%19
- Opp 3-Point Pct32.3%65
- Opp 3PA Rate39.9%28
- Opp FT Att Rate39.3%14
- Opp Points / Shot1.3014
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game74.519
- Paint Pts Allowed27.75
- Fast Break Pts Allowed7.820
- Pts off TOVs Allowed13.231
- Opp Assist Pct54.3%29
- TOVs Forced / Game12.333
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct71.6%45
- Turnovers Forced Pct18.3%22
- Steal Pct9.2%42
- Block Pct3.5%14
- Hakeem Pct12.7%21
- PF Efficiency1.25x2
- Steals / PF0.33x39
- Blocks / PF0.13x20
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 353 D-I teams- #5AST%62.6%
- #73PM Diff+98
- #973P%34.8%
- #113PO TOV Diff-47
- #127Opp 3P%32.3%
- #136eFG%50.4%
- #142TOV%18.6%
- #192TS%52.6%
- #5AST%62.6%
- #73PM Diff+98
- #973P%34.8%
- #113PO TOV Diff-47
- #127Opp 3P%32.3%
- #136eFG%50.4%
- #142TOV%18.6%
- #192TS%52.6%
- #352FTAR21.8%
- #281Adj DRtg106.5
- #270Pts Diff-126
- #270Paint Pts %34.5%
- #260Opp TOV%17.7%
- #248REB Diff-60
- #242Opp eFG%50.8%
- #233Adj ORtg99.3
Most Similar Seasons
to 2019-20- 1

Illinois ChicagoUIC 2021-2213-16HorizonMost alike in Adj O, Opp TOV%, eFG%85 - 2

Sacred HeartSHU 2025-2613-19MAACMost alike in Opp OREB%, eFG%, OREB%83 - 3

Army 2025-269-21PatriotMost alike in 3PA rate, Opp TOV%, OREB%82 - 4

Charleston SouthernCharleston So. 2015-166-21Big SouthMost alike in Tempo, TOV%, FT rate81 - 5

South AlabamaS. Alabama 2013-148-20Sun BeltMost alike in Adj O, Opp OREB%, Tempo81 - 6

North DakotaUND 2022-2311-20SummitMost alike in Tempo, eFG%, Adj O80 - 7

FIU 2021-2213-17C-USAMost alike in OREB%, Tempo, eFG%79 - 8

Le Moyne 2023-2412-17NECMost alike in TOV%, Adj D, Opp OREB%79 - 9

Rice 2020-2112-13C-USAMost alike in OREB%, Opp eFG%, 3PA rate78 - 10

Binghamton 2020-214-14America EastMost alike in Opp eFG%, Adj O, Opp OREB%78
| G. GilkesonGarrett Gilkeson | Sr | 6'4" | +0.776 | – | – | 47.7%24 | 18.3%53 | 9.9 | 5.7 | 3.4 | 33.1% | 77.2% |
| J. StephensJake Stephens | So | 6'9" | +0.673 | – | – | 51.7%41 | 21.4%73 | 7.1 | 4.6 | 2.0 | 33.3% | 77.8% |
| S. ConwaySean Conway | Fr | 6'4" | +0.155 | – | – | 61.8%83 | 17.9%50 | 5.7 | 2.9 | 0.7 | 36.2% | 72.7% |
| T. EveeTravis Evee | Fr | 6'0" | +0.153 | – | – | 56.6%66 | 21.6%74 | 12.6 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 35.1% | 83.6% |
| G. ParhamGreg Parham | Jr | 6'4" | -0.147 | – | – | 52.4%45 | 22.1%77 | 9.4 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 37.2% | 72.7% |
| K. CurfmanKamdyn Curfman | Fr | 6'0" | -0.915 | – | – | 54.3%55 | 16.3%38 | 10.0 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 37.3% | 68.4% |
| M. LewisMyles Lewis | Jr | 6'5" | -1.010 | – | – | 51.9%42 | 23.5%83 | 7.6 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.0% | 58.6% |
| W. MillerWill Miller | Sr | 6'8" | – | – | – | 70.8%93 | 16.2%37 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 50.0% | 0.0% |
| T. CreammerTyler Creammer | Sr | 6'10" | – | – | – | 52.9%47 | 17.4%46 | 3.3 | 4.6 | 1.1 | 18.2% | 51.5% |
| T. FahlTragen Fahl | Jr | 6'8" | – | – | – | – | 13.6%20 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| C. ArnoldConnor Arnold | So | 6'7" | – | – | – | 92.5%97 | 24.3%86 | 4.2 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 75.0% | 50.0% |
| L. TangLouis Tang | Fr | 6'4" | – | – | – | 55.2%59 | 19.8%63 | 4.4 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 25.5% | 61.5% |
| J. RichesonJordan Richeson | Fr | 6'4" | – | – | – | – | 18.4%53 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-26 | #358 | -21.73 | 100.810 | 122.51 | -6.321 | -2301 | +3774 | 26.5%10 | -3269 | 49.0%16 | 32.9%33 | 72.3%47 | |
| 15-19 | #300 | -9.620 | 102.623 | 112.224 | -5.818 | -5223 | -1238 | 28.3%34 | -1858 | 50.4%36 | 32.5%26 | 76.1%87 | |
| 4-28 | #358 | -22.51 | 91.11 | 113.68 | -3.340 | -8018 | -834 | 25.2%17 | +1321 | 47.7%16 | 31.2%13 | 69.2%19 | |
| 7-25 | #350 | -15.45 | 101.427 | 116.91 | -2.740 | +4757 | -3420 | 30.4%64 | +727 | 49.6%31 | 35.1%67 | 76.6%93 | |
| 16-16 | #166 | 1.156 | 111.688 | 110.515 | -1.950 | -1041 | +8194 | 24.5%16 | +3924 | 56.4%98 | 38.1%97 | 79.2%99 | |
| 9-24 | #258 | -5.732 | 101.341 | 107.021 | -3.138 | -746 | +12298 | 27.9%46 | -1155 | 51.8%75 | 35.5%82 | 70.8%48 | |
| 11-21 | #306 | -11.014 | 102.635 | 113.66 | 0.463 | -1278 | +3372 | 23.2%7 | -2059 | 50.9%50 | 35.9%72 | 73.0%72 | |
| 9-21 | #335 | -17.15 | 92.12 | 109.232 | -3.528 | -11111 | -2235 | 25.7%20 | +3223 | 46.3%5 | 32.0%9 | 74.0%79 | |
| 6-24 | #325 | -16.16 | 97.114 | 113.37 | -0.957 | -13510 | +452 | 27.4%30 | +644 | 48.1%18 | 31.6%8 | 69.0%39 | |
| 6-21 | #317 | -13.810 | 97.113 | 110.914 | -2.737 | -1687 | +3981 | 26.0%15 | +447 | 48.6%32 | 33.6%34 | 72.3%77 | |
| 9-19 | #285 | -7.725 | 99.933 | 107.521 | -3.926 | -8418 | +188100 | 32.7%66 | -5686 | 48.2%37 | 31.7%19 | 68.4%41 | |
| 18-13 | #208 | -2.543 | 109.472 | 111.914 | -6.411 | -3235 | +9395 | 34.0%74 | -8089 | 51.0%65 | 32.5%24 | 71.3%62 | |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-IShot Profile
vs D-IShot Clock
18 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 351 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 19-20. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 19-20. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.








