Drexel19-12

CAACoach: Zach Spiker

19-12NET#117

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Justin Moore	809	143	85.0%	+26.1100	+10.192	−16.198	+4.992	+7.196	+0.244	−3.034	−5.190	+6.796	+2.886	+0.744
Luke House	799	152	84.0%	+15.794	+13.898	−1.958	+6.496	+10.0100	−1.672	−16.72	+2.028	+7.698	+0.558	−9.088
Amari Williams	685	267	72.0%	−12.114	−14.94	−2.864	−1.832	−10.02	+1.230	−1.940	−0.656	+1.060	+0.152	−11.994
Mate Okros	643	309	67.5%	−5.830	−0.448	+5.322	−0.446	−9.34	−6.998	−2.738	+3.616	−1.636	+1.066	−2.764
Lucas Monroe	512	439	53.8%	−0.648	+5.276	+5.820	+1.262	+3.378	−0.964	−7.814	+7.82	+4.788	+1.574	−9.890
Lamar Oden Jr.	414	538	43.5%	−12.514	−15.54	−3.066	−5.98	+2.574	+6.20	−1.046	−4.688	−5.98	−0.248	+5.322
Yame Butler	333	619	35.0%	+4.868	+4.372	−0.552	+1.466	+4.284	+2.516	+8.590	−2.170	−2.330	+1.776	+10.08
Garfield Turner	274	678	28.8%	+12.288	+12.496	+0.248	+0.758	+7.296	−2.380	+2.062	−0.050	−0.348	−0.936	+4.824
Jamie Bergens	238	713	25.1%	−16.68	−7.218	+9.58	−4.214	−10.52	−1.570	+19.8100	+0.346	−7.74	−3.310	+8.710

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Justin Moore	809	143	85.0%	14.972	109.652	94.776	50.8%48	35.6%70	17.1%46	27.0%42	45.6%72	75.1%78	15.6%40	19.2%80
Luke House	799	152	84.0%	13.570	110.354	96.874	51.0%50	36.2%72	16.8%48	25.1%36	46.7%66	75.3%78	15.3%38	17.6%84
Amari Williams	685	267	72.0%	7.660	103.938	96.374	49.6%42	31.6%54	17.4%44	26.9%40	46.2%68	74.4%74	15.2%38	15.8%88
Mate Okros	643	309	67.5%	9.162	108.048	98.868	50.0%42	31.5%54	14.8%62	26.6%40	47.6%64	73.5%70	15.5%40	18.2%82
Lucas Monroe	512	439	53.8%	10.866	110.554	99.766	50.6%48	36.0%72	16.6%48	24.0%32	50.0%54	76.4%80	15.9%44	14.6%90
Lamar Oden Jr.	414	538	43.5%	4.054	99.428	95.476	46.7%30	36.0%72	20.6%22	26.9%42	43.8%78	70.9%58	15.1%38	22.0%72
Yame Butler	333	619	35.0%	14.270	110.954	96.874	51.0%50	37.4%76	18.6%34	33.1%58	45.0%74	72.6%66	16.3%46	25.7%60
Garfield Turner	274	678	28.8%	19.778	116.970	97.272	50.6%48	39.5%82	15.3%58	28.8%48	46.4%68	73.9%72	14.6%34	22.5%70
Jamie Bergens	238	713	25.1%	-1.544	102.736	104.256	46.9%32	26.6%34	15.9%54	42.8%78	46.6%68	68.3%48	12.7%22	25.6%60

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Justin Moore	809	143	85.0%	-11.228	99.628	110.838	45.9%28	28.6%42	16.8%46	30.1%50	50.7%48	68.4%48	12.9%24	18.5%82
Luke House	799	152	84.0%	-2.142	96.624	98.770	44.7%22	26.2%32	18.4%36	41.8%76	44.8%76	67.8%44	14.8%36	26.6%56
Amari Williams	685	267	72.0%	19.778	118.974	99.168	51.4%50	41.6%86	16.1%52	28.9%48	46.8%66	73.3%70	15.2%38	27.7%54
Mate Okros	643	309	67.5%	14.972	108.448	93.578	50.4%46	40.8%86	21.7%18	29.3%48	44.0%78	75.1%78	14.6%34	20.9%74
Lucas Monroe	512	439	53.8%	11.466	105.442	94.078	49.5%42	32.8%58	17.5%42	31.8%56	42.2%84	71.7%62	14.4%32	24.4%64
Lamar Oden Jr.	414	538	43.5%	16.474	114.964	98.470	52.6%58	33.5%62	14.3%66	27.9%44	48.4%58	76.8%82	15.3%38	16.8%86
Yame Butler	333	619	35.0%	9.362	106.644	97.372	49.6%42	33.1%58	16.2%52	24.6%34	47.1%64	74.9%74	14.6%34	15.7%88
Garfield Turner	274	678	28.8%	7.560	104.640	97.172	49.9%42	32.3%56	17.7%42	26.9%40	46.4%68	74.2%74	15.5%40	17.7%84
Jamie Bergens	238	713	25.1%	15.272	109.952	94.876	51.1%50	37.1%76	17.4%44	23.0%30	46.3%68	76.1%80	16.0%44	16.8%86

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.