East Carolina14-18

AmericanCoach: Michael Schwartz

14-18NET#194

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

RJ Felton	1,682	257	86.7%	−1.246	+3.670	+4.924	−1.238	+5.792	+0.934	+11.094	+2.822	−2.628	+0.762	−6.682
Brandon Johnson	1,572	367	81.1%	+13.290	+2.464	−10.892	+3.282	−6.98	−3.590	−0.548	−3.078	+3.380	+3.794	−2.564
Bobby Pettiford	1,290	649	66.5%	−2.840	+6.180	+9.010	−0.248	+3.680	−1.064	+4.576	+0.742	−3.918	−3.510	+0.744
Ezra Ausar	1,251	688	64.5%	+0.150	−4.628	−4.774	−0.942	+1.564	+3.78	+4.778	+1.632	+1.060	+4.798	+2.138
Jaden Walker	1,102	837	56.8%	−4.534	−5.126	−0.652	−0.150	−5.212	+0.540	+3.974	+0.246	+5.692	−2.120	+0.148
Cam Hayes	842	1,097	43.4%	−8.622	−8.214	+0.446	+0.354	−4.516	+1.724	−11.26	−0.858	−5.210	+1.574	−1.860
Kalib LaCount	473	1,466	24.4%	+8.380	+5.076	−3.366	+1.870	−0.646	−1.570	+4.276	+0.444	+4.890	+0.154	+0.546
Quentin Diboundje	466	1,473	24.0%	+11.888	+13.598	+1.740	+4.690	+4.888	−0.962	+5.682	+1.632	+3.884	−1.824	−2.060
Cyr Malonga	390	1,549	20.1%	+9.082	+4.874	−4.270	+2.274	−1.438	−1.166	−3.134	−5.290	−3.620	−2.022	−6.380
Valentino Pinedo	211	1,728	10.9%	−28.42	−13.16	+15.32	−6.16	+0.960	−0.252	−19.82	+6.94	−3.918	−0.542	+14.72
Ben Bayela	157	1,782	8.1%	+3.664	−3.732	−7.382	−7.74	+4.284	−4.494	−4.228	+3.120	+0.960	+6.4100	+2.236
Callum Richard	138	1,800	7.1%	−10.218	−5.224	+5.124	−1.732	+5.790	+4.56	+1.460	−4.084	−5.98	−5.72	−5.678

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

RJ Felton	1,682	257	86.7%	-2.942	107.948	110.838	47.8%34	36.5%72	16.9%46	35.1%64	52.2%40	65.5%36	19.2%66	31.7%40
Brandon Johnson	1,572	367	81.1%	-0.246	107.848	108.146	48.6%38	34.4%64	16.1%52	33.5%60	51.2%46	66.5%38	19.8%68	32.0%40
Bobby Pettiford	1,290	649	66.5%	-3.740	109.452	113.134	47.9%36	36.9%74	16.4%50	35.1%64	52.0%42	64.6%32	17.9%56	32.8%38
Ezra Ausar	1,251	688	64.5%	-2.742	105.742	108.446	47.6%34	36.2%72	18.1%38	35.3%64	52.4%40	66.3%38	20.8%74	33.3%34
Jaden Walker	1,102	837	56.8%	-4.738	105.242	109.942	47.9%36	33.4%62	17.0%46	35.4%64	51.9%42	68.3%48	18.2%58	32.6%38
Cam Hayes	842	1,097	43.4%	-7.634	102.836	110.440	48.1%36	33.1%58	17.7%42	27.3%42	51.4%44	62.9%26	19.9%70	31.5%42
Kalib LaCount	473	1,466	24.4%	3.552	111.256	107.746	49.3%40	35.2%68	15.6%56	36.8%68	52.1%40	69.5%52	19.1%64	32.9%38
Quentin Diboundje	466	1,473	24.0%	6.258	117.672	111.438	51.4%50	39.3%82	16.1%52	37.9%70	53.0%36	68.7%48	17.7%56	31.0%42
Cyr Malonga	390	1,549	20.1%	4.454	111.256	106.848	49.7%42	34.5%66	15.9%54	31.2%54	47.7%62	63.2%26	17.5%54	27.7%54
Valentino Pinedo	211	1,728	10.9%	-28.012	95.722	123.714	42.6%16	36.5%72	16.6%48	16.2%12	58.0%18	62.4%24	18.6%62	45.7%14
Ben Bayela	157	1,782	8.1%	0.548	104.038	103.458	41.0%12	39.5%82	12.8%76	29.8%50	54.6%30	66.7%38	24.9%90	34.6%32
Callum Richard	138	1,800	7.1%	-12.328	102.634	114.930	46.3%30	41.0%86	21.0%22	35.0%64	48.1%60	60.5%18	13.8%28	27.4%54

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

RJ Felton	1,682	257	86.7%	-1.744	104.238	105.950	48.9%40	30.7%50	15.9%54	24.2%34	49.3%54	68.1%46	18.5%60	38.2%24
Brandon Johnson	1,572	367	81.1%	-13.526	105.442	118.922	45.4%24	41.2%86	19.6%28	34.0%62	54.2%32	63.2%26	16.1%44	34.5%32
Bobby Pettiford	1,290	649	66.5%	-0.944	103.336	104.256	48.1%36	33.3%62	17.4%42	30.6%52	51.3%46	68.5%48	21.4%78	32.0%40
Ezra Ausar	1,251	688	64.5%	-2.842	110.454	113.234	48.5%38	34.8%66	14.4%64	30.7%52	50.8%48	65.3%34	16.1%44	31.2%42
Jaden Walker	1,102	837	56.8%	-0.246	110.354	110.540	48.0%36	38.6%80	16.5%50	31.5%54	51.6%44	62.7%26	20.3%72	32.5%38
Cam Hayes	842	1,097	43.4%	1.048	110.954	110.040	47.8%34	37.7%78	16.0%52	38.5%70	52.1%40	68.1%46	18.4%60	33.3%34
Kalib LaCount	473	1,466	24.4%	-4.838	106.244	110.938	47.5%34	35.9%70	17.1%44	32.6%58	51.7%44	64.7%32	19.1%64	32.4%38
Quentin Diboundje	466	1,473	24.0%	-5.638	104.238	109.742	46.8%30	34.5%66	17.0%46	32.3%58	51.4%44	64.9%34	19.5%68	33.0%36
Cyr Malonga	390	1,549	20.1%	-4.638	106.444	111.038	47.5%34	36.0%72	17.0%46	34.3%62	53.0%38	66.7%42	19.5%68	33.9%34
Valentino Pinedo	211	1,728	10.9%	0.446	108.850	108.546	48.7%38	35.6%70	16.8%48	36.0%66	51.1%46	66.2%38	19.1%64	31.0%42
Ben Bayela	157	1,782	8.1%	-3.142	107.746	110.838	48.6%38	35.3%68	17.1%44	34.0%62	51.5%44	65.8%36	18.5%62	32.4%38
Callum Richard	138	1,800	7.1%	-2.042	107.848	109.842	48.1%36	35.3%70	16.4%50	33.5%60	52.1%40	66.4%38	19.5%68	33.0%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

East CarolinaECU14-18

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

East Carolina14-18