Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Elon logoElon logoElon logoElon logo

Elon14-16

CAACoach: Matt Matheny

14-16NET#171
Schedule
WCharlotte logoCharlotte logoLMichigan logoMichigan logoWLSyracuse logoSyracuse logoWMount St. Mary's logoMount St. Mary's logoLTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoWKennesaw St. logoKennesaw St. logoWFIU logoFIU logoWWAlabama St. logoAlabama St. logoWUNC Greensboro logoUNC Greensboro logoWUNC Asheville logoUNC Asheville logoLDuke logoDuke logoLNortheastern logoNortheastern logoWDrexel logoDrexel logoWJames Madison logoJames Madison logoLHofstra logoHofstra logoLUNC Wilmington logoUNC Wilmington logoWCharleston logoCharleston logoLWilliam & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logoLJames Madison logoJames Madison logoLHofstra logoHofstra logoWNortheastern logoNortheastern logoWDelaware logoDelaware logoLTowson logoTowson logoLUNC Wilmington logoUNC Wilmington logoLCharleston logoCharleston logoWDrexel logoDrexel logoLTowson logoTowson logoLWilliam & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logoWDelaware logoDelaware logoLDrexel logoDrexel logo

Team Stats

30 games
  • Net Rating-2.145
  • Offensive Rating116.076
  • Defensive Rating118.021
  • Pace64.434
  • Effective FG%51.8%76
  • Off Rebound Pct27.2%27
  • Turnover Pct19.7%42
  • FT Attempt Rate30.4%8

Team Stats

30 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-2.145
  • Offensive Rating116.076
  • Defensive Rating118.021
  • Pace64.434
  • Effective FG%51.8%76
  • Off Rebound Pct27.2%27
  • Turnover Pct19.7%42
  • FT Attempt Rate30.4%8

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct46.7%44
  • Point Margin / Game-1.345
  • Points / Game74.664
  • Points Allowed / Game76.024
  • 1st Half Margin-1.042
  • 2nd Half Margin-0.348
  • Avg Largest Lead9.042
  • Avg Largest Deficit12.136

Box Score

  • Points / Game74.664
  • Rebounds / Game36.664
  • Assists / Game14.982
  • ORebs / Game10.241
  • DRebs / Game26.478
  • Steals / Game5.120
  • Blocks / Game2.211
  • Turnovers / Game12.749
  • PFs / Game19.449

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game26.675
  • FGAs / Game60.383
  • Field Goal Pct44.1%55
  • 2PMs / Game17.439
  • 2PAs / Game33.011
  • 2-Point Pct52.6%90
  • 3PMs / Game9.293
  • 3PAs / Game27.298
  • 3-Point Pct33.9%40
  • FTMs / Game12.29
  • FTAs / Game18.315
  • Free Throw Pct66.7%16

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s46.5%19
  • % Pts from 3s37.1%93
  • % Pts from FTs16.3%4
  • Paint Pts / Game24.167
  • % Pts in Paint32.3%59
  • Fast Break Pts / Game3.343
  • % Pts on Fast Break4.5%41
  • Points off TOVs / Game11.459
  • % Pts off TOVs15.2%53
  • 1st Half Pts / Game34.664
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game39.672

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %54.6%60
  • Points / Shot1.2442
  • 3-Point Att Rate45.2%97
  • Assist Pct56.1%77
  • Assists / 100 Poss23.284
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.18x72
  • PF Drawn / Game19.347

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%50.3%45
  • Opp True Shooting %53.6%60
  • Opp Field Goal Pct44.8%34
  • Opp 2-Point Pct49.1%46
  • Opp 3-Point Pct35.3%41
  • Opp 3PA Rate30.9%90
  • Opp FT Att Rate33.4%73
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2364

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game76.024
  • Paint Pts Allowed25.328
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed4.730
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed11.546
  • Opp Assist Pct44.9%95
  • TOVs Forced / Game11.318

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct70.2%50
  • Turnovers Forced Pct17.6%23
  • Steal Pct7.9%21
  • Block Pct3.4%11
  • Hakeem Pct11.3%8
  • PF Efficiency1.01x46
  • Steals / PF0.26x20
  • Blocks / PF0.11x11

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 351 D-I teams
  • #223PM Diff+75
  • #80AST%56.1%
  • #85eFG%51.8%
  • #127SOS1.8
  • #139TS%54.1%
  • #147TOV%17.8%
  • #151Paint Pts %39.7%
  • #156Adj ORtg105.2
Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
  • #223PM Diff+75
  • #80AST%56.1%
  • #85eFG%51.8%
  • #127SOS1.8
  • #139TS%54.1%
  • #147TOV%17.8%
  • #151Paint Pts %39.7%
  • #156Adj ORtg105.2
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
  • #323FTAR30.4%
  • #307Opp TOV%15.9%
  • #255OREB%27.2%
  • #232REB Diff-53
  • #2123P%33.9%
  • #210FB Pts %5.5%
  • #206Opp 3P%35.3%
  • #201Adj DRtg105.6

Most Similar Seasons

to 2015-16
Find Similar
  1. 1Duquesne logoDuquesne logoDuquesne 2015-1616-17A1090
  2. 2UTSA logoUTSA logoUTSA 2017-1817-15C-USA89
  3. 3Rice logoRice logoRice 2020-2112-13C-USA89
  4. 4Penn logoPenn logoPenn 2019-2015-11Ivy85
  5. 5Charleston Southern logoCharleston Southern logoCharleston Southern 2013-149-18Big South84
  6. 6Purdue Fort Wayne logoPurdue Fort Wayne logoPurdue Fort Wayne 2018-1915-15Summit84
  7. 7Illinois Chicago logoIllinois Chicago logoIllinois Chicago 2021-2213-16Horizon84
  8. 8Washington St. logoWashington St. logoWashington St. 2018-1911-21Pac 1284
  9. 9Boston College logoBoston College logoBoston College 2020-214-16ACC84
  10. 10Quinnipiac logoQuinnipiac logoQuinnipiac 2021-2213-17MAAC81
Schedule
Loading the schedule
TSTannerSamsonSrTyler Seibring headshotTylerSeibringFrCHChristianHairstonJrDainan Swoope headshotDainanSwoopeFrLELukeEddyJrSteven Santa Ana headshotSteven SantaAnaFrDTDmitriThompsonSo
TSTonySabatoSr
SHSamHershbergerSr
RBRyderBowlineJr
BDBrianDawkinsSo
PRPatrickRyanJr
WBWesBrewerJr
CLCollinLutherSo
JAJackAntonSo
JGJackGeorgeFr
Sheldon Eberhardt headshotSheldonEberhardtFr
KKKarolisKundrotasFr
T. SamsonSr6'4"+1.188––60.5%8717.7%4711.34.22.136.6%80.0%
T. SeibringFr6'8"+0.881––58.8%8215.5%319.74.71.939.6%60.7%
C. HairstonJr6'7"+0.366––60.6%8719.3%588.85.91.10.0%55.8%
D. SwoopeFr6'0"-0.149––51.7%4821.1%718.92.51.836.6%69.1%
L. EddyJr6'1"-0.246––49.5%3726.4%9310.82.84.525.5%69.4%
S. Santa AnaFr6'4"-0.245––52.1%5022.9%807.93.51.334.7%65.2%
D. ThompsonSo6'4"-0.532––54.2%6020.9%699.64.71.226.1%63.5%
T. SabatoSr6'7"–––45.2%2421.4%730.80.80.00.0%33.3%
S. HershbergerSr6'0"–––70.9%9728.6%971.10.10.10.0%100.0%
R. BowlineJr6'4"––––8.9%50.00.02.00.0%0.0%
B. DawkinsSo6'8"–––55.4%6621.2%715.82.70.521.4%57.7%
P. RyanJr6'6"–––100.0%9920.0%644.00.00.00.0%0.0%
W. BrewerJr6'7"–––100.0%9920.7%680.50.30.00.0%0.0%
C. LutherSo6'6"–––28.4%77.6%40.41.00.30.0%33.3%
J. AntonSo6'8"–––48.5%3313.6%191.81.40.426.7%60.0%
J. GeorgeFr6'10"––––0.0%10.01.00.00.0%0.0%
S. EberhardtFr6'5"–––50.3%4116.3%361.60.80.333.3%100.0%
K. KundrotasFr6'11"–––41.8%1717.8%471.31.00.033.3%62.5%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Elon logoElon logo25-2614-18#227-4.838111.564116.315-3.046+242-183333.3%73-246352.5%6034.3%5672.2%45
Elon logoElon logo24-2517-16#182-0.854110.167110.932-4.534+22796-302337.6%97+117351.2%4933.0%3774.9%79
Elon logoElon logo23-2413-19#315-9.718104.841114.55-5.125-4429+95530.2%62+243152.0%6735.2%6970.7%34
Elon logoElon logo22-238-24#333-13.7897.28110.917-4.223-7320-73725.7%23+263048.6%1830.2%470.8%41
Elon logoElon logo21-2210-22#268-6.927100.530107.3311.367-6523+407625.8%26+651350.1%4634.2%5773.7%71
Elon logoElon logo19-2012-21#281-8.620100.236108.812-2.939-8218+748923.5%14-115450.6%5836.3%8973.6%75
Elon logoElon logo18-1911-21#315-12.41299.119111.512-3.631-8817+498123.8%10+721152.6%7035.6%6869.3%38
Elon logoElon logo17-1814-18#241-6.431103.837110.126-1.255-8419+55422.6%7+461852.7%7134.9%4971.1%49
Elon logoElon logo16-1718-14#1351.558103.850102.366-1.452+846+578525.0%13+213552.5%7335.5%5868.5%33
Elon logoElon logo15-1614-16#171-0.850105.455106.2400.461-3336+849528.0%30+342752.3%7934.2%4566.1%13
Elon logoElon logo14-1513-18#245-5.13398.021103.150-2.936-7422+327428.8%23-487748.6%4135.1%6168.3%39
Elon logoElon logo13-1416-13#198-1.347106.153107.441-4.823-2737+829427.8%16+213453.9%9237.5%8372.3%75

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
54.1%#139
Effective FG %
51.8%#81
3-Point %
33.9%#209
3PAR
45.2%#12
FTAR
30.4%#323
Assist %
56.1%#79

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
31.7%#268
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
24.2%#79
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

21 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 48.4% of shots at 0.70 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7148.4%0.70Middle (11–20s): 31.9% of shots at 1.38 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2931.9%1.38Late (21s+): 19.7% of shots at 1.33 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2219.7%1.33SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0478D-I 0.99
Early 0–10s0.704748.4% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.387831.9% of shots
Late 21s+1.338019.7% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 48.5% of shots at 0.71 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7248.5%0.71Middle (11–20s): 28.5% of shots at 1.29 points per shot, against a D-I 1.3028.5%1.29Late (21s+): 23.0% of shots at 1.34 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2323.0%1.34SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0238Allowed, D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.715248.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.295228.5% of shots
Late 21s+1.341323.0% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 344 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 15-16. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 15-16. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.